Threats and Challenges of Pakistani Taliban for Islamabad Gov’t

2021/10/13 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A former Iranian diplomat considered Islamabad’s support for the Taliban coming to power in Kabul as a threat to Pakistan’s future and said: The coming to power of the Taliban in Kabul stimulates ethnic sentiments for supporting the Pashtuns in the Pashtun-populated and tribal areas and this will become a great challenge for the government of that country.

Mohsen Rouhi Sefat, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, while referring to the challenges of the Pakistani Taliban for the central government in that country, said: The Taliban ethnic movement considered the issue of “Pashtunistan” as an important issue during the period of absolute rule in Afghanistan, and even a week in the Afghan calendar was named “Pashtunistan Movement”.

He explained: In that week, several speeches and meetings were held throughout Afghanistan and position used to be taken against the Pakistani government. They claimed that Peshawar was Afghanistan’s winter capital that should be returned to it or that Pashtunistan should become an independent state.

Stimulation of ethnic sentiments for supporting Pashtuns in Pakistan’s tribal areas

Reminding that in seven areas of Pakistan’s tribal free zones, Pakistani law did not apply and “Pashtunwali” laws prevailed, he said: The coming to power of the Taliban in Kabul is fueling ethnic sentiments for supporting Pashtuns in Pakistan’s Pashtun-populated and tribal areas, and this will become a major challenge for the government of that country.

The international affairs analyst continued: Pakistan, like Afghanistan, has nation-state problems and consists of four main ethnic groups with Islam as their common chapter through which they have separated themselves from India. Among ethnic groups, however, ethnic issues have more pronounced implications than ideological issues, and ideology is interpreted in favor of ethnicities.

Rouhi Sefat added: The ethnic agitation of the Pashtuns in this context is a danger for the central government, and of course in this regard, the will of the Baluchis should also be taken into account; because they did not simply join Pakistan at the time of the separation of India and Pakistan from Britain, and after several years of resistance, the Pakistani army was able to annex them to the country.

The former Iranian diplomat said: Previously, the Pashtuns had signed an agreement with the government of Pakistan that the Pashtunwali should prevail in the tribal areas and the flag of Pakistan should be installed only on the asphalted roads. Of course, this issue was disputed during the years of al-Qaeda presence in those areas, and Parviz Musharraf tried to suppress them by force of arms. Recently, with a bill passed in the parliament, those areas became fully part of the Pakistani government; but the Pashtuns and their leaders continue to challenge the issue.

“Caliphate” movements among Pashtuns, challenge before government of Pakistan

He cited the Taliban’s belief in “caliphate” as another challenge facing the government of Pakistan, adding: Muslims in those areas have always dreamed of reviving the great and glorious government that prevailed at the beginning of Islam. Among the Sunnis, this issue is seen in the form of the “idea of ​​reviving the caliphate”. So far, all such efforts have failed, but the Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan has revived the idea that Sunni ulema and clerics are able to establish an Islamic caliphate among Muslims. This has created a significant force among Sunni Muslims.

Rouhi Sefat described the deep ties between Pakistani and Afghan Sunni clerics as a ground for stirring up the views of the Pakistani Taliban, adding: It seems that we will be witness to this kind of Taliban rule in Pakistan in the future. Of course, the differences in the situation in these two countries must be taken into account; because the Pakistani army is one of the strongest in the region, and according to some views, it is the army that administers Pakistan. However, among the military, there is also a large religious and middle-class spectrum, and from this point of view, the caliphate movements in Pakistan can cause problems.

According to the expert on international affairs; religious powers have a better chance of mobilizing the people, even in elections, than secular parties. Although in Pakistan the military is an obstacle to some independence and power-seeking tendencies, it should not be forgotten that during Musharraf’s time there were numerous clashes between the army and tribal areas seeking to “establish a rule of God’s law”. They were not yet known as the Taliban at that time, but the clashes weakened the country and the military.

He continued: Some official parties in Pakistan, such as the “Jamiat Ulema-e Islam Pakistan” Party led by Maulana Fazlur Rehman, have been claiming the post of prime minister and the government for years and are running in elections, sometimes even have ministers in the coalition governments. In the current situation, they are motivated and encouraged to establish such a power in Pakistan with the help of the Afghan Taliban.

The former Iranian diplomat emphasized: This situation before it could lead to create a stable situation; will cause unrest, conflict and instability in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and will face instability and insecurity in eastern Iran. Such challenges and Iran’s interests can also be threatened due to the existence of broad common borders.

Dangers of Islamabad support for Taliban coming to power in Kabul

Rouhi Sefat described Islamabad support for the Taliban’s rise to power in Kabul as a threat to Pakistan’s future, and regarding the Taliban’s views on the possibility of separatist tendencies, such as the formation of Pashtunistan in the border areas, said: The Taliban will not align with Pakistan after consolidating power in Afghanistan; because Afghans are usually xenophobic and after coming to power, they get involved even with those who helped them.

He added: The Afghan Taliban will not be in line with Pakistan’s interests in the future. The Durand Line issue has sensitivities for Afghan public opinion, and in addition, since the Taliban are accused of being supported by Pakistan, they will inevitably oppose the issue to prove themselves against Pakistan in order to acquit themselves and prove they are independent.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading