Dream of Greater Morocco; Cause of Tension in Morocco-Algeria Ties

2021/10/10 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: After the independence of Algeria in 1962, the issue of demarcation of common borders with Morocco caused a rift between the two countries. Ahmad Bakhshi - Expert on Africa affairs

Algeria considered the demarcation as a criterion when France left Algeria and believed that this was the framework of the two countries’ borders, but Morocco believed that to draw the borders, one should go back to the time before the arrival of French colonialism and therefore considered the two regions of Tindouf and Béchar, which are now part of Algeria, as part of its own territory. In this regard, the emphasis of the Moroccan nationalists on the “Greater Morocco” theory, which claims sovereignty over the Western Sahara, Mauritania and much of Algeria, has led to the perception of a security threat by the Algerian decision-making system. This perception of security was reinforced by Morocco’s initial move to invade Algeria, and eventually led Algeria to fully support the Polisario Front as an active players to prevent the dream of a greater Morocco. In this regard, Algeria has even agreed to cede part of its territory (the Tindouf region) to the Polisario Front as a desert settlement of the Sahrawi people and the Western Sahara government. Moroccan officials have repeatedly accused Algeria of backing the Polisario Front, saying Algeria should be an influential party to the talks, while Algeria believes it supports UN efforts to resolve the desert issue and is not a part of the conflict. Therefore, since the time of independence, relations between the two countries have been strained over the delineation of the sphere of influence, and since then, the accelerators and proxies have been used to intensify the tension, and any action by one of the countries has entailed the reaction of the other side for the of neutralization or for opposition.

Morocco and Algeria, with more than 1,700 kilometers of common land border, have not yet been able to seize opportunities, but have sought to threaten or hinder each other’s activities. For example, in 1963, the two countries entered into a war known as the “Sand War” over border disputes. The conflict ended with the intervention of Arab and African countries. Algeria began building a 271-kilometer retaining wall on its border with Morocco a few years ago, which is about seven meters high and two meters wide. Algeria says it was aimed at preventing drug trafficking through Moroccan territory and to ensure the country’s security. Morocco has already built a 100-kilometer wall on its borders, with an aim of fighting organized crime and preventing extremists from infiltrating Algeria. From 2011 to 2015, Morocco and Algeria purchased 56 percent of the weapons in Africa, according to the Stockholm World Peace Research Center.

The differences between the two countries have caused each to try to strengthen their defense capabilities, and there is even competition in launching satellites and fighting counterintelligence between Algeria and Morocco. The result of this competition is ups and downs in relations and not taking advantage of the opportunities of the two countries to strengthen the economy and convergence of the two countries and the region. On the other hand, the parties accuse each other of any action against national security. The recent fire in Algeria is one example, which has affected about 20 Algerian provinces and killed nearly 70 people; in this regard, the Algerian foreign minister announced that Morocco, with the complicity of the Zionist regime, was involved in the recent fires in the country and announced the severance of Algerian diplomatic relations with Rabat. One of the two countries’ challenges in the African Union is that Algeria was opposed to Morocco’s return to the African Union a few years ago, nevertheless, Morocco has returned to the Union and has so far been able to change the views of many African countries on the Polisario Front and its ownership of the desert. Also, the issue of opposition of some African countries to the Zionist regime’s membership in the African Union as an observer and even the bilateral relations between Rabat-Tel Aviv and the tension in Iran’s relations with those countries can be searched in the differences between Algeria and Morocco and the way of looking at the Polisario and the territorial politics of the two countries. The ban on Moroccan passenger and military flights over Algerian airspace and the violent talks between the two countries’ foreign ministers at the recent UN summit also reinforce the possibility that the diplomatic war between Algeria and Morocco will escalate in the coming days.

Although the African Union manages the crisis like the Renaissance Dam in the eastern part of the continent, and the Arab countries, in addition to playing a mediating role, want restraint of both countries, but the intervention of countries in the region and beyond and the confrontation of the politics of the borders at the time of independence with the idea of Greater Morocco, shows the continuation of this crisis and its regional spread, and a short-term perspective cannot be drawn for it. However, Morocco is pursuing its historic objective with an active continental foreign policy and a policy of recruiting through economic aid.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading