Europe’s Confusion in Relations with Russia

2021/06/01 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An expert on international affairs said that in Europe we are witnessing a kind of confusion and also differences among various factions towards Russia, adding: Europe’s strategy towards Russia is first to guarantee supply over demand and then to extend this style of agreement to other contentious issues, including human rights or conflicting interests in Eastern Europe.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Afifeh Abedi referred to Europe’s actions against Russia and at the same time criticism of the EU officials for Moscow’s reactions towards it, saying: There are many influential components in Russia-Europe relations. The conditions of Russia’s bilateral relations with each of those countries, along with Russia’s relations with the European Union, Russia-Europe-US trilateral relations, as well as international issues and relations, including US-China ties, each of which, by changing trend, can be influential in the perspective of Russia-Europe relations.

Noting that the Europeans see Russia as a major economic market, and sanctions and escalating tensions could affect that market, he said: The outlook for Russian-European relations is affected by bilateral relations between Russians and European countries. The Russians have always tried to improve their relations with the European Union by improving their bilateral relations with European countries. Of course, this policy has also been successful. As we can see, Russia-Germany relations and the Stream 2 project have affected US policy toward Russia.

The expert on international affairs further remarked: Russia continues to invest in relations with Germany, and the Germans place considerable weight on relations with Russia, both within Europe and with the United States, because of their needs and their political and economic considerations. And this is one of the issues that affects Russia-Europe relations in the Russia-US-Europe triangle.

Europe’s strategy towards Russia

Abedi added: The European Union has adopted a double standard policy regarding the United States and Russia under Mr. Biden. On the one hand, it seeks to restore the Atlantic Alliance with a more balance towards Europe, and on the other hand, it seeks to resolve its issues with Russia through negotiation and containment of tensions through various means, including sanctions and bringing the Russians to the negotiating table. It can be said that Europe’s strategy towards Russia is first to guarantee supply over demand and then to extend this style of agreement to other controversial issues, including human rights issues or the conflicting interests of the two sides in Eastern Europe.

Referring to recent tensions in Europe-Russia relations, the international affairs analyst said: The Russians, because of their economic dependence and strategic and cultural interests in the West, have always sought to increase their relations with Europe and within the framework of their own interests, the most important of which are mutual respect and consideration for Russia’s political and security considerations in Eastern Europe, welcome the easing of tensions and the expansion of relations with Europe.

Referring to Europe’s criticism of Russia offering a list of unfriendly countries and its stressful assessment of it, Abedi continued: Europe’s concerns about Russia and the common European and American positions on Russia should be separated. Russia-Europe economic ties have expanded, and given Europe’s dependence on Russian energy, however, there are concerns that the Russians could use the issue as a tool against Europe for their own political and security interests.

Europe’s confusion in relations with Russia

She added: On the other hand, the Europeans feel threatened by the Russian expansionist dream in Eastern Europe and the revival of the Soviet empire in Europe in the light of the developments of the past decade, especially the crisis in Ukraine. For this reason, in Europe, we are witness to the differences in different European factions towards Russia.

The expert on international affairs, saying that in terms of feelings of threat and concern, Europe and the United States are common but have differences in terms of facing it, she added: Those differences are also evident within the European Union and some countries are more in line with the US strategy towards Russia, but other countries in the Union are working harder to contain tensions with Russia and are following a long-term approach to control and reduce the Russian threat. That is why we are witnessing a kind of confusion about Europe’s relations with Russia.

Periodic ups and downs in Germany-Russia relations

At the same time, she stressed: Despite all the differences that we see within Europe, in terms of the feeling of concern, all member states are the same. The most important country in the European Union that has an approach towards Russia different from that of the United States is Germany. It is noteworthy, however, that periodic ups and downs in German-Russian relations also indicate periods of cooperation and alliance or tension and cold relations until the full war.

The expert on international affairs further elaborated: After the Ukraine crisis in 1994, Germany was involved in putting pressure on Russia by imposing tougher EU sanctions on Russia, but after a series of talks, it has helped reduce tensions by reviving the Nord Stream 2 project. It seems that the German energy index and the desire to improve its international position are among the most important factors influencing bilateral relations between Moscow and Berlin.

Regarding Russia’s approach to those concerns and tensions, Abedi said: The Russians have always seen the United States as an obstacle to the expansion of Russia-Europe relations, and they use this keyword a lot. Improving political and economic relations between Russia and Europe, will reduce the threats posed against Russia in Eastern European countries.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading