Obstacles and capacities of strengthening relations between Iran and Uzbekistan

2020/11/06 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: During the tenure of Shavkat Miromonovich Mirziyoyev, the new President of Uzbekistan, changes have partly taken place in relations between Uzbekistan and other countries including Iran. Hassan Beheshtipoor—Expert of Asia affairs

The Islamic Republic of Iran and Uzbekistan, enjoy enormous capacities and similarities to expand mutual relations. Tehran and Tashkent benefit from a huge historical asset as well as cultural and religious commonalities. The use of such capacities could result in strengthening ties and relations between the two countries in various areas especially economy and trade in the interest of the two nations. Even though until Islam Karimov the ex-president of Uzbekistan was in power, the doors were closed to the improvement of relations between the two countries and therefore necessary cooperation was absent in the relations between Iran and Uzbekistan. This is while the two sides can profit from very good grounds for cooperation which already exist between them; however, Karimov was not interested in developing these relations. Now, during the tenure of Shavkat Miromonovich Mirziyoyev, the new President of Uzbekistan, changes have partly taken place in relations between Uzbekistan and other countries including Iran.

At the present time, Iran and Uzbekistan can establish stronger relations in several areas especially economy and trade. In this respect, railway cooperation between Iran, Uzbekistan and Afghanistan could result in the formation of trilateral cooperation which will benefit Uzbekistan and this country can connect to international markets through this railway. Using Iranian ports is another option which could be of interest to both Tehran and Tashkent as goods transited to Bandar Abbas Port, south of Iran, through railway spread to the north, could make their ways to open seas and the whole world. Therefore, thanks to its strategic location and neighbourliness with the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman, Iran can help link Uzbekistan to the world.

Under the present juncture, Uzbekistan can export cotton to Iran, for the domestic use of the country and re-export to other countries. Such capacities have remained untouched until date.

Moreover, cooperation in the tourism sector is of importance for both Iran and Uzbekistan as the latter is home to Iranian-Islamic civilization, especially in Samarqand and Bukhara as attractive tourist destinations. Similarly, Iran has a lot of attractions for the Uzbeks as both countries share some parts of their history as it is suggestive in civilization centres in Bukhara and Samarqand in Uzbekistan and Isfahan and Shiraz in Iran.

Therefore, cooperation in cultural and even sports sectors could be a good start for the expansion of bilateral relations.

In this respect, regional cooperation should be also taken into consideration as both Iran and Uzbekistan are members of the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) but have had no trade and commerce in this framework. This is while banking and insurance cooperation is envisaged within the framework of ECO. In the meantime, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in which Iran enjoys an observer status could help Tehran and Tashkent develop relations. This  SCO capacity has been underused in the enhancement of relations and ties between the two countries.

It seems that trilateral or quadrilateral cooperation with the presence of Iran and Uzbekistan in the region could become a reality in formats of cooperation between Iran, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan or Iran, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan and or even with the presence of Kazakhstan and or Tajikistan.

There are some issues to be blamed for the failure of the Tehran and Tashkent to develop relations with enormous commonalities; on one hand, there is some sort of suspicion and doubt for years overshadowing mutual relations and on the other, the American sanctions have created impediment in Iran-Uzbekistan relations.

In fact, the Uzbeks, like many other countries, have concerns about the US sanctions and punishment, refusing to cooperate with Iran.

Notwithstanding, the two countries can establish a greater cooperation and expand bilateral links. For example, they can begin by simpler sectors such as tourism and rail and road transport and transit and gradually expand other areas. Under the present circumstances, a barter mechanism should be defined between Iran and Uzbekistan so that goods are exchanged for goods and Uzbekistan is saved from American punishment and sanctions. Of course, in any way, and under the present regime of sanctions, the two countries are in a difficult condition to expand cooperation; however, officials and organs of the two countries could find proper solutions in close consultation through diplomatic channels.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

Loading