Potentials for Improvement of Iran-Tajikistan Relations; Obstacles Ahead

2020/10/11 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - There are countries in the region that envy Iran-Tajikistan relations, the historical background and understanding that the two governments and the two nations have of each other, and are seeking to destroy such relations. Under these circumstances, Iran and Tajikistan should expand their relations and act vigilantly to resolve the prevailing claims and disputes. Dr Abdolreza Faraji Rad - Expert on Geopolitical Affairs

On Friday, September 25, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned Mr Nizamuddin Zahedi, Ambassador of the Republic of Tajikistan to the Ministry, for a second time in a week. The news was somewhat shocking considering the open process of reorganizing relations between the two Persian-speaking countries. In the statement “baseless allegations and irresponsible behaviour of Tajik state television” was cited as the main reason for “summoning the ambassador and conveying strong protest of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” The cause of the protest was the broadcast of a so-called documentary series on Tajik state television entitled “Betrayal”, in which false and biased accusations were made against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Now, despite such issues, it is necessary to look at the history of relations between the two Persian-speaking countries and emphasize the need for vigilance on the part of the officials of the two countries to prevent escalation of such disputes.

Iran and Tajikistan are two independent states but in fact, people in no other two countries are so close to each other; either in historical, cultural, scientific or arts fields. Therefore, there is much interest between the people of the two countries. Since Tajikistan’s independence, Iran has been one of the first countries to recognize that country, and good relations were established between Tehran and Dushanbe from the very beginning. This good relationship has continued despite some ups and downs in recent years. As in the past decades, the two countries enjoyed close relations; but recently these relations have experienced some ups and downs, although it is not possible to speak of a hostile relationship between the two countries. There are some misunderstandings between Iran and Tajikistan, such as the film recently aired on Tajik television. It has been claimed in the film that some Iranian agents are contributing to the activities of the Islamists (according to them, terrorists) in that country. I do not think that in the government of the Islamic Republic or among the people there would be any interest to cause a difficulty or problem in Tajikistan. Therefore, some countries that have problems with Iran would incite some people in the name of Iran to take measures to destroy the relations between the two countries. There are countries in the region that are jealous of the relations between Iran and Tajikistan, the historical background and the understanding that the two governments and the two nations have of each other, and are seeking to destroy these relations. Under such circumstances, Iran and Tajikistan should expand their relations and act vigilantly to resolve claims and disputes.

At a time when relations between Tehran and Dushanbe were greatly improving, foreigners raised such issues in the news, and in the meantime, Saudi Arabia tried to get closer to Tajikistan to keep it away from Iran; but the Dushanbe government understood the case very well and, except for a short period, did not allow the relations to be destroyed at all. In this regard, during the last one or two years, Mr Rouhani visited Tajikistan and various issues were discussed during the visit. Unfortunately, US sanctions did not allow the agreements reached during that trip to be properly implemented; because flights were cancelled, traders could not travel, and cultural works were somewhat halted. Under this situation, the two governments of Iran and Tajikistan should be careful that some countries intend to destroy their relations and therefore should prevent its realization.

In general, countries such as Iran, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan can take many joint actions with each other. At present, relations between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, which were previously strained, have improved significantly, which is a turning point in the progress of the measures of the three countries. It should be noted that Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have no access to the high seas, so Iran could be their connection point to the international waters. Agreements have been reached with Uzbekistan in this regard, but have not been implemented yet. It is hoped that agreements will be reached with Tajikistan in this regard.

Finally, it should not be overlooked that both Iran and Tajikistan are interested in expanding relations, and their governments and nations have repeatedly shown this interest. In fact, Iran and Tajikistan can become a model for other countries, such as Afghanistan and Uzbekistan, whose cultures are close to these two countries, and these four countries can take steps towards expansion and improvement of relations.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading