Extraction of Energy in Mediterranean & Its Legal Complexity

2020/05/21 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online: In the matter of fossil energy resources in the Mediterranean, Egypt, the Zionist regime, Greece and Cyprus have formed a bloc against that of Turkey, Libya and the Northern Cyprus. This situation has drawn the region to further security and military disputes. Meanwhile, if Syria, Lebanon and Gaza also enter the process of exploring and extracting gas fields, the equations will be much more complex. Sabah Zangeneh - Energy Affairs Expert

The Mediterranean Sea lies between the three continents of Europe, Asia and Africa and is geopolitically very important. At the same time, the countries around the Mediterranean have common interests in the field of energy. Meanwhile, energy consumption in European countries is higher than in other countries, and efforts are more focused on exporting the region’s gas to Europe. Also big countries that dominate the Mediterranean are Turkey, Egypt, Syria, Greece, Cyprus, Lebanon and Palestine, which are divided into two parts: the Gaza Strip and the Israeli regime.

The parties that have been exploring and measuring the possibility of extracting from the Mediterranean for the past two or three decades include Cyprus, the Israeli regime and Egypt. At the same time, the Israeli regime was ahead of other states in terms of extraction. However, in view of Israel’s inherent procedure, the regime tried from the beginning to control the ownership and facilities of the neighboring countries of Palestine. First, it prevented Gaza from extracting gas from the sea, except in accordance with its colonial conditions, and second, it declared that most of Lebanon’s gas fields belonged to the regime; thus, a long legal dispute arose between the two sides, which have not yielded clear results since the start of mining in Lebanon. That is, the exploration was delayed and now is the time to extract, but legal disputes over some of Lebanon’s 9th and 10th gas fields have persisted and prevented the extraction.

As for Egypt, the Italian gas company Eni and some other companies have started extracting gas, and it is interesting to note that the largest gas reserves are located in Egyptian waters and look like a large mountain under which gas is trapped and one of Egypt’s richest assets.

But there are a few things to keep in mind about Egypt’s gas extraction: first, they started extraction late and in insufficient quantities, and second, Egypt’s high population has led to high energy consumption. This energy is used for industrial, domestic and petrochemical purposes, etc. There were also disputes between Egypt and Israel, which have been resolved to some extent.

At the same time, there are confluxes at the top of the triangles, squares, and geometric shapes of their gas resources. According to the Turkish government, the Cypriot gas on the one hand leads to the country’s blue border, and Turkey claims that the Turkish Cypriot sector must extract gas in coordination with Ankara. Meanwhile, the Greek-speaking part of Cyprus covers most of the country and has a larger share of gas. This has led Turkey to enter into legal, political and even security disputes with neighboring countries such as Syria, Greece, Cyprus and Egypt.

In this regard, we saw that Turkey reached an agreement with the West Libya, which is governed by the government of Faez al-Saraj, recognized as the official government of Libya by the United Nations, and sent troops to the region. Turkey’s move was aimed both at strengthening the position of Faez al-Saraj’s government and at reaching a gas agreement to access Libya’s gas resources. Under the deal, it was agreed that Turkey and West Libya work together to extract gas. Thus, Turkey opened a border for itself on the Mediterranean coast and outside the Egyptian border. If we draw a hypothetical line from Italy to the coast of Africa, that part of the coast of Africa that flows into Libya is united with Egypt in the eastern part and with Turkey in the west. Therefore, the border of Turkish gas cooperation with Libya will be outside the borders of Egypt.

At the same time, Cyprus has reached an agreement with Egypt on gas exploration, extraction and development.

Overall, some of these differences are in favor of the Israeli regime, and Greece, which traditionally opposes the Tel Aviv regime, will also have to coordinate gas issues with Israel in multilateral agreements. Thus, Egypt, the Zionist regime, Greece and Cyprus have formed a bloc against Turkey, Libya and northern part of Cyprus. This situation has embroiled the region in further security and military disputes. In the meantime, if Syria, Lebanon and Gaza enter the process of exploring and extracting gas fields, the equations will be much more complex.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading