Strategic Goals of Yemeni Resistance Operation against Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online: What we have witnessed in the recent widespread operations of the Ansarullah movement and the Yemeni people's armies against Saudi positions is, on the one hand, an attempt to persuade Saudi Arabia to admit its military weaknesses inside Yemen, and on the other, an attempt to thwart troublesome and armed moves of mercenary groups seeking to disrupt the situation in Sanaa (the capital of Yemen) and create new insecurity in the region. Jafar Ghanadbashi - Middle East Affairs Expert

While Saudi Arabia has been reluctant to accept peace negotiations as well as a ceasefire and ending bombing of residential areas in Yemen, and despite military weaknesses continues to seek to inflict blows on the Yemeni people, Ansarullah forces and popular armies, the recent Yemeni military offensive against Saudi Arabia, codenamed Bonyan al-Marsoos (Firm Structure), liberated an area of ​​about 2500 square km in the common border triangle with Yemen’s strategic provinces (Maarib, Sanaa and Jawf), and this area alone, regardless of the strategic importance of its objectives is an important achievement in the liberation of all areas under the grip of Saudi coalition.

In fact, the Ansarullah movement and the popular armies in Yemen recently launched the operation Bonyan al-Marsoos – a major and important operation that had significant features. First of all, the operation covered the Saudi Jizan province in a wide area in addition to the West Sanaa region and some of the vast provinces east of the capital, where various types of heavy and light weapons were used in asymmetric warfare. Furthermore, Ansarullah forces hit Aramco oil facility in Jizan province with medium-range and long-range missiles.

The operation was said to have liberated about 2,500 square kilometres of Yemeni territory from the clutches of mercenaries and hundreds of Saudi soldiers and mercenaries were taken captives.

During the operation, Ansarullah movement and the Yemeni people’s forces seized many war booties so much so that according to observers the ammunitions and arms needed for several other important operations had been gained.

The important point in this operation was to thwart a major operation that had been designed to seize the capital city of Sanaa by the Saudi mercenaries. Operation Bonyan al-Marsoos totally thwarted that operation.

In fact, Operation Bonyan al-Marsoos took place at a time when Saudi leaders sought to gain a new military position whereby to impose a new set of political conditions on the Yemeni people: In particular, the regional situation has posed a lot of difficulties for Saudi Arabia, as Riyadh officials are more willing than ever to end the five-year war in Yemen in a face-saving manner. Clear indications of such a situation should be sought in the eventual withdrawal of the UAE forces from Yemen, as well as in the calculations that have led the Saudi leaders to get rid of the Yemen swamp. At the same time, Saudi Arabia’s widespread air operations over al-Hadidah province is another sign of the military madness resulting from the impasse the Saudis are facing. As the Ansarullah officials say, the operation violates the Stockholm peace treaty in its entirety.

In any case, what was made clear in Operation Bonyan al-Marsoos and the passive response of the Saudi government reflects Ansarullah’s immense capacity to defend the Yemeni territory and at the same time illustrates the crippling military weaknesses suffered by the Saudi forces. This means that Saudi Arabia lacks a winning card to advance its goals in Yemen, and the latest efforts by Saudi officials to make field victories and turn them into a new bargaining chip have failed.

Meanwhile, the Ansarullah movement has proved its superiority in the military field by repelling the operations of the Saudi mercenaries and preventing the collapse of the Yemeni capital, and by relying on this military capability wants its demands met.

In particular, the withdrawal of the UAE military forces from Yemen itself indicates the superior position of the Ansarullah movement and the failure of the aggressor forces and adds to the capabilities of the Ansarullah movement in this unequal battle. It is clear that future developments in Yemen will continue the same course, and despite Yemen’s all-out siege, the people of Yemen will benefit from the five years of war experience and the amazing capabilities they have achieved (missile capabilities, drones and ground battles) will be able to force the Saudi invading forces like Yemeni forces out of Yemen and inflict more severe defeats on the forces of this reactionary monarchy.

Overall, what we have witnessed in the widespread operations of the Ansarullah movement and the Yemeni popular armies is, on one hand, an attempt to force Saudi Arabia to accept its military incapability inside Yemen, and on the other is an attempt to thwart the troublesome and armed movements of the mercenary groups that seek to disturb the situation in Sanaa and create new insecurity in the region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading