Responding to Israeli Aggressions; Promising New Equations in the Region!

Strategic Council Online: Former Iranian ambassador to Iraq pointing to Lebanese Hezbollah's military response to the recent Zionist regime aggressions, noted: “Expectations were that the Resistance would certainly respond to Israel’s audacity and as put by the Supreme Leader the time for their “hit and run” game is over. It is no longer the case for them to take some action and the nations of the region sit idle and just watch them.”

Hassan Danaeifar, referring to changing conditions in the region in favor of the Resistance and Zionist regime’s efforts aimed at defeating the axis, added: “Netanyahu has faced problems in the events of the region because his pressures have not produced the results he expected. This behavior and this situation have caused a series of reactions that we have seen in the Lebanese and Syrian scenes. Netanyahu is working to draw attention to these actions and change the isolation and failure he has faced and drag the issues into another platform.

The former Iranian ambassador to Iraq said that the behavior of the Zionist regime in both Syria and Lebanon and Iraq can be analyzed in the context of these reactions and certainly the aggressions of the Zionist regime will not remain unanswered and the Resistance will certainly respond to the Zionist regime’s behavior.

“I believe the Zionist regime is in a state of contraction,” Danaeifar said of the new equations in the region. At one time, the regime was in a state of expansion, imposing whatever it wanted on the region. But today, many of the behaviors of this regime are reactionary. That is, in the face of the situation in the Middle East today Israel finds itself weaker and lonelier and has to take a series of actions that it thinks could save the regime. I think that this situation cannot bring this regime out of this bottleneck.”

He emphasized: “Today the Quds occupier regime has turned into a state of contraction from a state of expansion and does not hold the upper hand on the regional issues.

“Israelis need to learn a lesson and change the way they have been in the past,” Danaeifar added. They need to know that the seventies and eighties are over and every step they take today will spark a response. This is not a propaganda issue but a serious matter.”

The former Iranian ambassador to Iraq, referring to Hezbollah’s military response to the Zionist aggression last week, noted that the move showed that there was strong resolve to counter the provocative actions of the Quds occupier regime, both politically and socially and culturally as well as in terms of militarily facilities.

Following the recent response of Hezbollah to the Zionist regime, Danaifar said, “The problem of Europe and the US is that they are under the influence of the Quds occupier regime rather than being the other way round. Serious voices have been raised in Europe time and again in condemnation of building settlements, but Israel would not listen to these voices and disregards the words of the Europeans. You see fewer European countries that have not condemned these settlements. This shows that, unfortunately, most European and American politicians are serving the interests of Israel and that the Quds occupier regime has the right to attack others but others are not allowed to defend themselves. This is a clear contradiction that the Americans and some European countries have failed to respond to and resolve.

The former Iranian ambassador to Iraq said this contradiction is very inauspicious and seriously worries any free thinker in the world. This is similar to what we see in the UK. It is very easy for the prime minister and the Queen to agree to set aside and remove the parliament from some of the major decision makings. This contradicts the fundamentals of democracy and this contradiction is of the same nature and even worse.

“This is not unexpected from the Americans,” he said. The oppressed people of the region also suffer from these contradictions that Americans exercise in practice. The cases in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Bahrain, Libya, North Africa, and Iraq are due to the unilateralism they exercise.

Danaifar said the Resistance would certainly not play in a field designed by the Zionist regime. There is unity in both Syria and Lebanon regarding giving severe responses to the recent Zionist  regime’s aggressions.

Referring to the installation of ridiculous images in Baghdad against Trump and the Zionist regime, he emphasized: “These demands are quite obvious in the region. In Iraq today, there are loud voices against the Zionist regime and the United States as the sole supporter of Tel Aviv.

The former Iranian ambassador to Baghdad said: “They launched many programs in the region, but they were not able to continue their plans and failed in accomplishing their goals. Today, what they followed under the title of “coalition” in Yemen was in fact a coalition against the innocent people of Yemen and we see figures like 300 people killed or wounded in a single UAE military strike on Aden.

The situation has become such that even Hadi criticizes Saudi Arabia for not being able to respond to the UAE. This plus more precise reports will certainly reach the Zionist authorities.

Danaifard concluded by saying: “Those who sought the Deal of the Century in the face of divisions and insecurity in the Persian Gulf states will lose the same winning card under the title of integrity of the “Arab States in the Persian Gulf” and will face more problems.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading