An analysis of the negotiations and the final statement of the Sochi meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Russia has come to the conclusion that the differences between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia are progressing in a direction that has moved away from the previous situation and that these two countries have come closer to peace, and in this regard, it is trying to build understanding between the two sides in its own name.

Referring to the summit meeting between the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan Republic and Russia in Sochi during which Baku and Yerevan agreed to use force or intimidation against each other, Mohammad Reza Damavandi told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that “a week before the tripartite meeting, the spokesperson of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that a “wide range” of tripartite and bilateral issues will be discussed in these talks. A few days later, the Kremlin explained in another statement that issues related to “reconstruction and communications and transportation” were among the topics discussed at the meeting.

He continued that “the day before this tripartite meeting, the Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia said that there are going to be negotiations regarding the signing of the peace treaty between Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan, and we hope that an agreement will be reached on various issues, including the signing of the peace treaty.

He added that when we put these positions together, it seems that the dialogue is not a single issue, and at the same time, Russia is trying to show its mediating role in resolving the disputes between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia.

This expert on Caucasus issues said that in the Kremlin’s official statement, it was also stated that we did not reach an agreement on all issues, but there was an understanding on the basic issues. Putin also read the space positively, considering it a good ground for possible future agreements; But in the bilateral meeting between Putin and Pashinyan before the tripartite meeting, two significant points were raised.

Recalling that Putin said in this meeting that the conflict has been going on for several decades and that it must be stopped now, and that Yerevan now has a political will to end the conflict, and we support it in any way”, Damavandi added that it seems that Russia has come to the conclusion that the differences between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia are moving in a direction that has moved away from the past and that these two countries are closer to peace.

He stated that the presidents of Russia, Azerbaijan and the Prime Minister of Armenia emphasized on adherence to the agreement on the full normalization of bilateral relations between Baku and Yerevan, and said that Russia is trying to register this understanding in its name.

“Moscow wants to show its role in moving towards the end of conflicts between the two countries for the concessions that it wants to exploit in the future.”

Referring to Pashinyan’s trip to Tehran immediately after the end of the Sochi meeting, this expert on Caucasus issues stated that this action was worthy of consideration, and Pashinyan mentioned in the meeting with President Raisi that Armenia wants Iran to be in the process of agreements. In the report he presented to the Parliament in Yerevan, he also said that Sochi summit is definitely a step towards the “implementation” of the peace plan.

Damavandi emphasized that it seems that the Sochi meeting is one of the last steps for the dialogue towards the signing of the peace treaty, and this treaty will be finalized soon.

“If we also take into account the informal talks that took place in Prague between Erdogan, Aliyev and Pashinyan, and that a few days later, the Turkish Foreign Minister said, “In our opinion, the peace treaty between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia is over and it only needs to be implemented”, it can be concluded that the peace agreement and the Sochi meeting were for the final conclusion of this issue.

Recalling Pashinyan’s proposal that “we are ready to sign a document on extending the mission of the Russian peacekeepers for 10, 15 or 20 years”, this analyst of Caucasus issues said that the energy transmission line of the region to Europe while providing energy to Europe and transforming this region and Turkey to the hub of energy, will give power to Russia to control it.

According to Damavandi, Russia advances the game in several directions.

“Perhaps, the issues related to the war in Ukraine cannot be seen to have a direct and clear effect on the developments in the South Caucasus, but in this game, there are exchanges of positions and points for the parties, and they try to gain the lost points on another front. Russia is trying to keep pressure on Europe by having the upper hand and keeping itself active.  But the difference is that with the mediation that was done for the energy transmission line and by having the ultimate control, Moscow will keep Europe in need and under its pressure.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading