Investigating Causes of Russia Support for Syria in UNSC

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on West Asia affairs said that Moscow has realized in its new regional interactions that it cannot under any circumstances open a special account on its relations with the Zionist regime and bring it to the level of strategic relations. He added: For the new Russia, due to the need to attract converging countries, the region of West Asia and especially Syria has become more important than before, to the extent that it is considered more important international supporters of Syria and aligned with Iran in this regard.

Seyed Reza Sadr al-Hosseini, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referred to the remarks of the deputy permanent representative of Russia to the United Nations, who called the attacks of the Zionist regime against military targets in Syria as unprecedented and asked the Security Council to respond appropriately to those attacks and stated: Russia has emphasized that the UN ignorance of Syria’s requests regarding the violation of its airspace by the Zionist regime and even the repeated letters sent to the Secretary General remaining unanswered, is unacceptable.

He stated that Russia considered the attacks of the Zionist regime, which violated the Syrian airspace, as one of the factors disturbing stability in Syria, and this is the position that Iran has had from the beginning regarding the measures of the Zionist regime in the region, adding: Looking at the process of interactions between Russia and Syria and the Zionist regime, we see noticeable changes in such relations, the changes are especially prominent between the Russian government and the Zionist regime. In fact, the anti-people actions that took place through the attacks and military invasions of the Zionist regime against the Syrian nation was a turning point that clarified the differences between Russia and the Zionist regime despite all the deep economic connections.

The expert on West Asia affairs said: Russia has realized in its new regional interactions that it cannot under any circumstances open a special account on its relations with the Zionist regime and bring it to the level of strategic relations; because the actions of the Zionist regime are dependent on the interests of the West and especially the United States, and the crisis created regarding Ukraine clearly showed the hostile position of that regime against Russia.

Sadr al-Hosseini continued: Sending weapons by the Zionist regime to Ukraine further fueled this mistrust and tension and convinced Russia that the Zionist regime will not move in any way in line with Moscow’s interests. This gap showed itself more in the recent attacks of the Zionist regime on Syria, and it seems that with the widening of this gap, the differences between them will expand.

Recalling that before and after the start of the war in Ukraine, Russia had demanded an unconditional halt to the Zionist regime’s attacks on Syria, he added: The media and military analysts of the Zionist regime have also acknowledged this, Moscow’s insistence on presenting a draft resolution in the Security Council to condemn the attacks of the regime on Damascus airport, is because of the position of the Zionist regime towards Russia’s attack on Ukraine, and the Zionist regime cannot ignore Russia’s opposition to the Tel Aviv attacks deep in Syria; because Russia has a military presence in Syria and Moscow has influence on the international scene.

The analyst of West Asia affairs added: Analysts of the Zionist regime emphasized that Russia’s reaction to the attack on the Damascus airport proves that the Zionist regime’s attempt to create discord among Russia, Iran and the Syrian regime has failed.

At the same time, Sadr al-Hosseini recalled that the Syrian army used Russian S-300 missiles to counter Israeli airstrikes, and said: The differences between the Zionist regime and Russia were initially manifested in the field of military issues, and after some time also stood out in the political sphere and the United Nations and made it clear that Russia has completely separated the account of the Zionist regime after the events in Ukraine and is following a new approach towards the regime.

Saying that the gap between the Zionist regime and Russia is increasing and pointing to Russia’s efforts to strengthen the position of the central government in Syria, he noted: In this regard, we witnessed the tense meeting of the United Nations Security Council regarding the mechanism of providing aid to the Syrian people and the veto of the resolution that bypassed the central government from Russia. Moscow deplored the violation of Syria’s sovereignty under the pretext of providing aid to the people, and also believes that considering that Bashar al-Assad’s government is in power in Syria, cross-border aid to that country should be provided through the central government, and Syria has repeatedly announced its serious concerns about the mechanism of sending aid through the border crossing.

According to the expert on West Asia affairs, the Zionist regime is trying to take maximum advantage of the space created in international relations after the conflicts in Ukraine in the fields of confronting the Islamic world and the front lines of Resistance. In fact, according to the mental and working conflicts of the UN Security Council and its active members, the Zionist regime takes maximum advantage, because it knows that the atmosphere that governs the media, due to the events in Ukraine, follows most of the issues arising from it, and issues such as attacks on Syria will be considered in the next categories.

Sadr al-Hosseini continued: It seems that for the new Russia, due to the need to attract countries converging with it, the region of West Asia and especially Syria has become more important than in the past and has increased its sensitivity towards Syria in various fields; to the extent that it is considered as one of the international supporters of Syria and in this field aligned with Iran.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading