Consequences of Netanyahu’s return

Strategic Council Online: Interview - A researcher on the Zionist regime’s affairs of the Jaraian research center, commenting on the reasons for Benjamin Netanyahu’s victory in the recent Zionist regime elections said: Netanyahu won the election with 64 seats, and the opposition faction won only 56 seats, but the fundamental issue is that Netanyahu’s victory in the said election was marked by mismanagement by the opposing faction.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Mansoor Barati explained: The votes the two parties from the opposition faction, that is to say the Yair Lapid faction, were slightly below the quorum; in other words, one of the main reasons for the increase in the number of votes of Netanyahu and his bloc was that the left-wing Meretz Party and the Balad Arab Party fell below the electoral threshold.

Regarding Netanyahu’s possible policies toward Iran, Barati said: Netanyahu’s policies regarding Iran have few characteristics compared to the previous government, that is to say the government of Yair Lapid, primarily the new prime minister’s policy is more unilateral than the current one who is in his final days, and secondly, Netanyahu’s coordination with his Western allies, Europe and the United States, will be much less than the current government.

He continued: Netanyahu has less faith that his policies toward Iran should be endorsed by the United States and Europe, nor does he believe much in coordination with Tel Aviv’s Western allies over his confrontation with Iran.

Saying that Netanyahu is making more efforts to build international consensus against Iran and on global and regional issues than Lapid and Bennett, the researcher added: It seems that during Netanyahu’s new premiership, terror and cyberattacks on Iran will be less on the agenda and more attention will be paid to the Axis of Resistance.

The researcher on the Zionist regime’s affairs explained on the relations with the European Union and the United States, especially joe Biden’s administration, and said: It is expected that there will be not much warm relations between the two sides, and especially as long as Biden is in the White House, the same situation will continue.

According to Barati, Biden’s relationship with Bennett and Lapid was much better than the relation that would be shaped under Netanyahu.

On this issue, he pointed to the rise to power of the far-right Religious Zionist Party, saying: As of now, Jewish groups in the U.S. and the Biden administration, as well as some European and Arab governments, have warned against the rise to power of the far-right Religious Zionist Party. The party is a major ally of Netanyahu, and some ministries, including possibly the Defense Ministry, are expected to be handed over to the party. This comes as the far-right’s rise to power overshadows and troubles cooperation with the West and Arab countries.

The researcher of the Jaraian research center, referring to the follow up of Ibrahim Agreement, the legacy of Netanyahu himself, noted: This policy is expected to be pursued more quickly and aggressively under Netanyahu, because this initiative was launched by Netanyahu himself. He also had promised in the election campaigns that in case he would become the prime minister, he would normalize the Zionist regime’s relationship with Saudi Arabia.

He added: Of course, the agreement was also pursued by the governments of Bennett and Lapid after Netanyahu’s nearly two years in power, and the Zionist regime’s embassies in Bahrain and the UAE were established in that period.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading