Future of Washington-Pyongyang Relations?

2019/01/09 | Economy, Opinion

Strategic Council Online: US-North Korea relations are currently stalled, that is neither a specific movement is being taken on the part of Washington, nor does Pyongyang want to meet the demands of the other side the way they wish. Ismail Bashari - Expert on Korean Peninsula affairs

President Donald Trump first tried to take political advantage of this relationship, that is he displayed a diplomatic gesture, then portrayed his talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un a victory before the world countries and claimed that he has been able to minimize one of the major threats in East Asia. Of course, in his talks with the North Korean leader, Trump had given some promises to the North Korean leader and in response, some steps were taken on the part of Pyongyang. North Korea stopped its missile tests and destroyed some facilities in the hope that the sanctions against his country would be reduced. In the second phase, which is a matter of discussions these days, it has been agreed that the United States end its joint exercises with Japan and South Korea and bring its nuclear presence in South Korea to an end, that is strategic weapons from other parts of the world would not be transferred to the Korean Peninsula and stocked there.

These were the goals the leaders of Washington and Pyongyang had put on the agenda following the Singapore talks. But over the past year, it was North Korea which fulfilled some of its commitments; the United States in return only reduced its war games in South Korea but took no action to ease the sanctions against Pyongyang, saying it would take action after denuclearization of North Korea.

This is while North Korea is not willing to take any action in this regard without getting significant concessions, most notably the disarmament of South Korea of US made tactical nukes.

Another point to be made here relates to the regional moves: Both South Korea and Japan have been trying to improve their relations with North Korea. In particular, South Korea has welcomed the current relationship and détente with its northern neighbour and there have been exchanges of visits by the top officials of the two countries. Therefore, there have been openings in Seoul-Pyongyang relations.

Meantime, the American pressures on China, on the one hand, and on Russia, on the other hand, at the international level, or in other words, the trade war against Beijing or the sanctions against Moscow, have made the two countries more reluctant towards resolving the Korean Peninsula problem, particularly if it is supposed to end in Washington’s favour.

Therefore, the United States has so far failed in persuading North Korea on denuclearization, and the issue is not even followed by South Korean officials so seriously.

Because from Seoul’s final perspective, the unity of the two Koreas is the target even if it occurs by creating a Confederation. Thus, it can be said that the two Koreas are willing to move towards forging unity by preserving the existing systems.

In fact, the South Korean nationalists might be interested to see a united Korea taking shape armed with nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. The analysis that the views of the South Korean President are fully in line with the outlooks of his American counterpart is incorrect.

From forging ties with Pyongyang, South Korea is pursuing its own special relations, but the United States seeks to portray talks with North Korea as a successful policy to the world and benefit from the same approach against Iran and other countries.

For this reason, there is already a type of stagnation in the Pyongyang-Washington talks and North Korea’s denuclearization. Therefore, it can be said that the success that Trump thought had achieved has now become an incomplete and almost ineffective gain. Unless the two parties put new talks on the agenda or the United States takes some practical measures to encourage North Korea to denuclearize. As a result, the question of whether the future of North Korean-US relations, as well as the talks between them, ends in these issues, especially Washington’s economic activity.

Because the sanctions have made life so hard for the people of North Korea, and its dealings with the countries of the world have been very difficult following the US pressures and Security Council resolutions. So Pyongyang seeks to reduce the sanctions so that it can take a breath.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading