Disputes in US-Russia Relations

2019/04/24 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online: The United States and Russia are pursuing two different approaches vis-à-vis the West Asia region, and these different approaches have led to geopolitical disagreements between the two countries, especially with regard to the region's major crises and dossiers. Shoaib Bahman - Expert on Russian Affairs

Relations between Russia and the United States have gone through many ups and downs since the collapse of the Soviet Union; sometimes, the two sides have tried to get closer to one another through détente. Some other times the war of words has escalated between the parties; in such cases, many analysts and politicians have spoken of the possibility of outbreak of a new war. Under the current conditions, despite US President Donald Trump’s personal desire to improve relations with Russia, which he clearly demonstrated during his election campaign, the US political structure and intelligence and security institutions actually opposed the improvement of relations with Moscow.

We are currently witnessing that not only disputes between Moscow and Washington exist, but it can be said that in some areas tensions between the two sides have been exacerbated. For example, the issue of security in Eastern Europe, the presence of Russia in South America, NATO expansion to the east, and military manoeuvres that NATO hosts in various parts of Europe, as well as various issues in West Asia region, are still among tensions between the two sides.

On the other hand, the issue of Venezuela has become, in the current period, another area of ​​competition between Moscow and Washington. Over the past years, with regard to the Venezuelan government’s policies inherited from the government of Hugo Chavez, the country has had deep differences with the United States. The US has made great efforts towards regime change in Venezuela. In contrast, Russia has been a traditional ally of Caracas. For this reason, Moscow today has been working hard to prevent the regime change from taking place in Venezuela. This issue has rekindled tensions between Russia and the United States in the South American region.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had greatly reduced its presence in the region, but in the current situation, it seems that Venezuela has again become a place to increase the geopolitical rivalry with the United States so that each of these actors supports one of the two domestic parties in Venezuela. Russia considers the administration of Maduro to be the legitimate government and believes that the action of the opposition is a coup attempt in the country. But America views the Maduro government unlawful and supports the opposition. This contradictory approach has led Venezuela to become one of the spheres of geopolitical disagreements between Russia and the United States.

Another controversial area between Russia and the United States and the West is the human rights issue that has been widely debated between the two sides since the past. While the West believes that human rights is a universal issue, and what they are bound by the West must spread all over the world. The Russians, however, have a different opinion. They believe that human rights should be outlined based on the cultural, social and general conditions of a country. Therefore, there has been a divergence of views on the past between Russia and the West (both the United States and Europe).

At present, there are also tensions between the two sides so that each year, the United States accuses the Russian government of violating human rights, suppressing dissidents and curtailing civil liberties in various reports. Russia responds by releasing reports through the Foreign Ministry accusing Washington of similar charges. Indeed, the human rights issue before having an applicable effect has been turned into a political charge, propaganda and psychological warfare to influence the public opinion on both sides.

Among other disputed areas between Moscow and Washington are the Middle East and West Asia, where there has been a controversy between the parties for long years. At the current stage, the Syrian crisis is one of the most important controversies between Russia and the United States.

Generally speaking, the Russian outlook about the region is different from that of the US. Russia wants stability in the region and supports maintaining the status quo, while Americans tend to overthrow or change political systems that do not serve the US interests. In this regard, in general terms, the United States and Russia are pursuing two different approaches on the West Asia region, and this different approach has led to geopolitical disagreements between the two countries, especially with regard to the region’s major crises and dossiers.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading