Behind the Presence of American Aircraft Carrier in Persian Gulf

Strategic Council Online: An expert on international affairs says: "As the Americans talk about withdrawing from Syria and reducing the number of their military forces in Afghanistan, there is a great deal of ambiguity about the future of the US allies, or in other words, the US affiliates in the region. Therefore, the presence of American aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf could suggest that US military withdrawal from Syria does not mean a decline in Washington's support for Saudi Arabia or the Zionist regime in the region.

As Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards held the final phase of the Great Prophet war games in the Persian Gulf region, which began on December 15, US aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis also entered the Persian Gulf waters. The move prompted reactions from Iran’s military officials.

An expert on international affairs, Saadollah Zarei, has discussed the dimensions and angles of this topic in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations.

 

Q: What is your assessment of the presence of an American aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf?

First of all, let’s remember that the presence of US warships in the Persian Gulf is not a new thing. Since 1988, American navies have been present in the Persian Gulf.

The US naval presence in the Persian Gulf was escalated during the second Persian Gulf War in 1991, and from the year 1990 up to now, that is over the past three decades, the US has dispatched warships to the Persian Gulf and their number has always been between 60 and 70.

However, with the Americans talking about pulling out Syria and reducing their military presence in Afghanistan, there is a great deal of ambiguity about the future of the US allies or, in other words, the US affiliates in the region.

Therefore, the presence of American aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf could suggest that US military withdrawal from Syria does not mean a decline in Washington’s support for Saudi Arabia or the Zionist regime in the region. By taking this action, it seems that the United States has sent a short message with a short range to some of its allies.

 

Q: Could the US naval presence have taken place under the provocation of Iran’s regional enemies?

The US could have done this upon the request of the Saudis or the Israelis. Because, as mentioned before, Tel Aviv and Riyadh are very concerned about the withdrawal of US forces from the region and are also afraid of Iran’s growing role. Therefore, it is not unlikely for them to have urged Washington to dispatch USS John C. Stennis to the Persian Gulf to put pressure on Tehran.

In fact, following a decision by the US to withdraw its troops from Syria doubts were raised on Washington’s continued support for US military support for Saudi Arabia and Israel, but the presence of the American aircraft carrier near the Iranian waters could come as healing.

Q: Can the United States use this occasion as propaganda against Iran?

I have not seen a wide reflection in this regard, and I suspect that this issue would attract much media coverage. Perhaps the US aims to create an anti-Iran climate, especially since it failed to achieve its anti-Iranian goals by its withdrawal from the Iranian Nuclear Agreement (also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action). Today too, Washington finds itself in a state of failure in the region, but this action cannot, by any means, affect Iran’s policies or the significant role played by the Islamic Republic.

 

Q: How do you assess the reaction and warnings of Iranian military officials?

Basically, such actions and US military presence in the Persian Gulf are unacceptable to the Islamic Republic of Iran, and therefore we regard any American movement in this region a security threat against the Persian Gulf states. This is our traditional policy with regard to the presence of foreign military vessels on the waterway, and for this reason, our military and security officials have issued warnings against the presence of the American warship.

 

Q: In recent decades, the presence of American aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf had become routine. But this year after the “USS Theodore Roosevelt left the region, Washington did not dispatch an alternative warship to the Persian Gulf. The Pentagon has described this as part of its plan to increase the US navy’s flexibility and unpredictability. Having these in mind, how long do you think the aircraft carrier will stay in the Persian Gulf?

President Donald Trump has said about the withdrawal of American troops from Syria, that it was ineffective and had big economic costs for Washington. Trump is expected to adhere to the same policy concerning military presence in the Persian Gulf.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading