Dr. Kharazi’s Recommendation to Trump:
The President of the United States must know that peace cannot be achieved through the use of force

Strategic Council Online: Dr. Seyyed Kamal Kharazi said: “The President of the United States must know that peace cannot be achieved through the use of force, and the Islamic Republic of Iran will stand firm against intimidation, just as it defended itself during the eight-year Holy Defense and the 12-day Israeli-imposed war.”

Today, the President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations (SCFR), at the conference titled “International Law under Assault, Aggression, and Defense,” held at the Institute for Political and International Studies (IPIS), stated: “The Iranian spirit of “We Can” has enabled them to achieve self-reliance in defending the country and national resilience against foreign interventions,” adding: “Iran has demonstrated that it will not make any compromise on its independence; unlike countries that put their independence up for auction under foreign pressure, Iran will never submit.”

Referring to the fact that Saddam Hussein never accepted responsibility for his aggression against Iran, while Donald Trump, the President of the United States, has assumed responsibility for supplying lethal weapons to the Zionist regime and for the 12-day war against Iran, he said Donald Trump’s recent statement that “Israel attacked first. This attack was very powerful. I was responsible for it.” constitutes an irrefutable document of direct American involvement in aggression against Iran, and consequently, they carry legal and political consequences for the U.S. government, and Iran considers itself legitimate to claim reparations from the United States for material and human losses.

SCFR President said: “Undoubtedly, the United States and the Zionist regime, which initiated this illegal war, must pay reparations. Therefore, if any negotiation takes place between Iran and the United States, the first requirement must be that the United States answer: On what legal basis did it commit this aggression? And thus, it will inevitably have to pay reparations.”

Emphasizing that “the Islamic Republic of Iran has always demonstrated throughout its history that it is ready to negotiate with others based on equality and mutual respect,” he added: “Meanwhile, the U.S. government has always resorted to economic pressure, political threats, and even military aggression to achieve its illegitimate objectives—a stance that every Iranian finds utterly unacceptable.”

Dr. Kharazi said: “The problem lies in the inexperience of Trump and his team; we witnessed this recently in the days leading up to the Iraqi elections. The U.S. Secretary of War behaved rudely and threateningly toward Iraqis regarding the Popular Mobilization Forces, and the result was that 59.11% of the population participated in the election, and revolutionary forces won many parliamentary seats.”

SCFR President emphasized: “Guns cannot eliminate the will of nations; therefore, Hamas, Hezbollah, Ansar Allah, and the Popular Mobilization Forces cannot be eliminated.”

Finally, Dr. Kharazi addressed this recommendation to Trump: “Just as your predecessors experienced Iranian resistance and were forced to sit at the real negotiating table with Iran, you too must adopt a respectful and positive approach toward Iran to witness its results. But please know that: Iran will not abandon its enrichment activities for peaceful purposes, will not relinquish its defensive capabilities, and will not put its independence up for auction.”

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of Europe’s Approach Towards Iran

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sanctions imposed by the European Union against the Islamic Republic of Iran before the activation of the snapback mechanism represent an effort to exert additional political and economic pressure on our country to change the system’s behavior regarding regional developments.

The Outlook for Ukraine Peace Negotiations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After nearly four years of conflict, the outlook for Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations remains unclear; not due to a lack of initiatives, but because of deep conflicts of interest, Russia’s strategy of exploiting the battlefield situation politically, and European confusion and lack of consensus. Achieving a lasting peace seems out of reach.

Review of the 2026 budget of the Zionist regime

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: It appears that the primary focus of the 2026 budget of the Israeli regime is on simultaneously managing war pressures, social discontent, and political ambiguities; even if this approach leads to the postponement of structural reforms and increases financial risks in the medium-term horizon.

The Implications of the United States’ New National Security Strategy on Global Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS 2025) is not merely a revision of Washington’s foreign policy, but an official declaration redefining its interests, sphere of influence, and the framework of international relations. This change could shake the foundations of the post-Cold War order and place Europe and NATO in a difficult position.

The goals of the Israeli regime in its military attacks on Syria

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asian affairs expert said: One of the main objectives of the recent attacks by the Israeli regime on Syria is to prevent the establishment of a strong central authority or government in Syria. Therefore, it is trying to prevent the comprehensive rule of the new government under the name of Ahmad al-Sharaa or al-Julani by attacking and invading southern Syria and various regions of the country, even Damascus.

China’s Strategy to Become a Global Military Power

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With its large arsenal of hypersonic missiles, advanced cyber capabilities, extensive satellite network, and survivable nuclear triad, China has become a serious competitor to the United States. Nevertheless, in strategic documents, including the 2025 National Security Document, China describes itself as a development-oriented power committed to the international order, whose path to rise does not pass through war.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of Europe’s Approach Towards Iran

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sanctions imposed by the European Union against the Islamic Republic of Iran before the activation of the snapback mechanism represent an effort to exert additional political and economic pressure on our country to change the system’s behavior regarding regional developments.

The Outlook for Ukraine Peace Negotiations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After nearly four years of conflict, the outlook for Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations remains unclear; not due to a lack of initiatives, but because of deep conflicts of interest, Russia’s strategy of exploiting the battlefield situation politically, and European confusion and lack of consensus. Achieving a lasting peace seems out of reach.

Review of the 2026 budget of the Zionist regime

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: It appears that the primary focus of the 2026 budget of the Israeli regime is on simultaneously managing war pressures, social discontent, and political ambiguities; even if this approach leads to the postponement of structural reforms and increases financial risks in the medium-term horizon.

The Implications of the United States’ New National Security Strategy on Global Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS 2025) is not merely a revision of Washington’s foreign policy, but an official declaration redefining its interests, sphere of influence, and the framework of international relations. This change could shake the foundations of the post-Cold War order and place Europe and NATO in a difficult position.

The goals of the Israeli regime in its military attacks on Syria

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asian affairs expert said: One of the main objectives of the recent attacks by the Israeli regime on Syria is to prevent the establishment of a strong central authority or government in Syria. Therefore, it is trying to prevent the comprehensive rule of the new government under the name of Ahmad al-Sharaa or al-Julani by attacking and invading southern Syria and various regions of the country, even Damascus.

China’s Strategy to Become a Global Military Power

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With its large arsenal of hypersonic missiles, advanced cyber capabilities, extensive satellite network, and survivable nuclear triad, China has become a serious competitor to the United States. Nevertheless, in strategic documents, including the 2025 National Security Document, China describes itself as a development-oriented power committed to the international order, whose path to rise does not pass through war.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

An Analysis of Europe’s Approach Towards Iran

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sanctions imposed by the European Union against the Islamic Republic of Iran before the activation of the snapback mechanism represent an effort to exert additional political and economic pressure on our country to change the system’s behavior regarding regional developments.

The Outlook for Ukraine Peace Negotiations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After nearly four years of conflict, the outlook for Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations remains unclear; not due to a lack of initiatives, but because of deep conflicts of interest, Russia’s strategy of exploiting the battlefield situation politically, and European confusion and lack of consensus. Achieving a lasting peace seems out of reach.

Review of the 2026 budget of the Zionist regime

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: It appears that the primary focus of the 2026 budget of the Israeli regime is on simultaneously managing war pressures, social discontent, and political ambiguities; even if this approach leads to the postponement of structural reforms and increases financial risks in the medium-term horizon.

The Implications of the United States’ New National Security Strategy on Global Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS 2025) is not merely a revision of Washington’s foreign policy, but an official declaration redefining its interests, sphere of influence, and the framework of international relations. This change could shake the foundations of the post-Cold War order and place Europe and NATO in a difficult position.

The goals of the Israeli regime in its military attacks on Syria

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asian affairs expert said: One of the main objectives of the recent attacks by the Israeli regime on Syria is to prevent the establishment of a strong central authority or government in Syria. Therefore, it is trying to prevent the comprehensive rule of the new government under the name of Ahmad al-Sharaa or al-Julani by attacking and invading southern Syria and various regions of the country, even Damascus.

China’s Strategy to Become a Global Military Power

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With its large arsenal of hypersonic missiles, advanced cyber capabilities, extensive satellite network, and survivable nuclear triad, China has become a serious competitor to the United States. Nevertheless, in strategic documents, including the 2025 National Security Document, China describes itself as a development-oriented power committed to the international order, whose path to rise does not pass through war.

Loading