The US House of Representatives opposition to the sale of weapons to Turkey; A blow to Erdogan

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: After the meeting between Erdogan and Biden at the NATO summit in Madrid and Turkey's withdrawal from the veto of Finland and Sweden's membership in NATO, positive signs were seen for Turkey's purchase of new weapons from the United States, and Biden supported the sale of F-16 fighter jets and modernization kits to Turkey. Yet, the US House of Representatives approved a plan to block the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Turkey. Mahmoud Fazeli—Analyst of international relations

Relations between Turkey and the United States have been strained in recent years due to Turkey’s exclusion from the US F-35 fighter jet sale program to Turkey under the pretext of buying Russian S-400 systems. In the last months of 2021, Turkey submitted a request to purchase 40 F-16 fighter jets from America. The request also included the modernization of 80 F-16 fighters in the Turkish Air Force fleet.
Senator Bob Menendez, the Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which examines major US international contracts in the field of arms, made the sale of F-16 fighters to Turkey conditional on a change in Ankara’s approach regarding the Russian S-400 system, the suspension of flights over the territory of Greece, a turn in relations with Russia and violations of human rights.
A few days before the vote on the above-mentioned plan, 35 American lawmakers from both major parties of the Congress wrote a letter to the President of the United States demanding to stop the sale of 40 F-16 fighter planes and to modernize 80 other planes to Turkey. From their point of view, selling these fighters to Turkey will mean rewarding Erdogan.
From the point of view of these lawmakers, which includes the Greek-Cypriot lobby in America along with Armenians, the forces supported by Turkey and Ankara use American-made weapons and parts to commit war crimes, including targeted bombing of civilian targets such as hospitals and schools in Iraq, Syria, and Nagorno-Karabakh.
They have also been used repeatedly to violate the sovereign territory of NATO allies and partners such as Greece and Cyprus. From the point of view of this group of representatives, the Turkish army should not be supported until concrete steps are taken to stop Erdogan’s destabilizing actions and his violation of international laws.
While “Doug Jones”, the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, or “John Kirby”, the strategic communications coordinator of the National Security Council of the White House, supported Turkey’s plan to modernize the country’s F-16 fighter fleet and called it a contribution to security, but a significant number of members of the US House of Representatives “consider the approval of this deal to be a terrible mistake.”
According to the opponents’ request, the sale of these weapons in the proposed article that they want to be approved by the Congress in the framework of the “2023 National Defense Powers Act”, the approval of the sale of weapons by the head of the US government to a NATO member country (Turkey), that has violated the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and airspace of another NATO country (Greece) in the past year is forbidden. If the sale of arms to this country is of vital importance for national security, and or if the violating NATO member state proves that it has not taken any contrary action in the last six months, the ban on the approval of the sale of arms by the President of the United States will be lifted. This group of representatives sided with the claims of Greece and the Greek part of Cyprus and they believe that Turkey takes a hostile position towards Greece.
The opposition of congress representatives to the sale of these planes is in a situation where this issue is considered another failure for Erdogan in the field of foreign and defense policy. According to Erdogan’s opponents, the statements of the Finnish and Swedish officials before the signature ink was dry in NATO show that Erdogan once again signed this document without receiving any concessions and now another scandal has arisen on the issue of F-16. It is predicted that the restoration of Turkey’s relations with the United States will face many difficulties before the important national elections in Turkey in 2023, and this can affect the popularity of Erdogan and the ruling Justice and Development Party.
The opposition of the US Congress comes at a time when Turkey is seeking to implement the joint production project of “Samp-T” air defense systems with France and expects to ensure the joint defense project with the cooperation of France.
Greece, which is one of the main opponents of the sale of American weapons to Turkey, has pressured the United States in the last year to take such a decision in various ways, including through the consultation of the Prime Minister of this country in the United States and a speech in the US Congress, which was met with strong and standing applause from the representatives. Greece, as Turkey’s traditional rival in the region, at the same time wants to buy fifth-generation fighter jets from America. The lobby of the representatives of this country in the US Congress has been active in opposing the sale of these fighter jets to Turkey. The tension in the relations between Greece and Turkey has never been so complicated and prolonged in any period of modern Greek history. Questioning the sovereignty of Greece over half of the islands of “Aegean and Crete” and strong anti-Greece sentiments in Turkey are proofs of this claim.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading