US Retreats against China

2019/07/14 | Economy, Opinion, top news

Strategic Council Online: Washington’s trade war with certain countries, particularly with China was the most important issue that cast a shadow on the G20 Summit in Osaka, Japan. Tahmores Gholami - American Affairs Expert

The 14th Summit of the G-20 states was held in Osaka, Japan for two days (July 5-6) with the participation of the leaders from 19 industrialized countries and the EU president. The meeting was attended by 20 major economies of the world. At the Japan Summit, US President Donald Trump met with almost all the members of the G20, but some of these meetings were more significant and noteworthy.

In every meeting, Trump held with G20 leaders a special issue was highlighted. Of course, the most important issue that cast a shadow on the Summit was the trade war between the United States and certain other countries, especially China. The US-China trade war is important for other countries because it leaves a negative impact on the world economy, drags the economy towards insecurity and a feeling of uncertainty, reduces global growth, and the fact that oil prices are steadily declining shows that global growth is low or there is no trust in the future.

So far, different trade talks between the United States and China have been conducted, including one in May which produced no results. So, after the talks failed in May, the United States imposed new tariffs on Chinese goods, and China retaliated at a lower level; but at the G20 meeting in Japan, the two sides agreed not to set tariffs on each other’s commodities so that trade talks between them could resume. In addition to the US-China trade war, there were also debates on Washington’s trade disputes with Europe, India and Latin America, but they were less covered.

At the Osaka Summit, the European Union was able to finalize its trade relations with Latin America, which could be cited as one of the achievements of the G20 Summit.

Among the other issues that were considered at the G20 Summit was the North Korean debate; in this regard, before the start of the Osaka meeting, the President of China had a trip to Russia and then to North Korea and held disarmament talks with Pyongyang officials. Beijing was seeking to send Washington a message that it could play a significant role in North Korea’s nuclear disarmament, provided that the United States stops the trade-economic war on China and, in particular, lifts the sanctions on China’s IT giant Huawei.

In fact, Beijing’s goal was to use the talks as a concession and this led Trump to follow up renewing a meeting with the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. Of course, since Pyongyang officials have already complained about the presence of the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and White House National Security Advisor John Bolton in the talks, Trump made arrangements so that they would not attend the last meeting with Kim and only the two leaders were present. In the meeting, Kim Jong-un and Trump agreed to resume talks on nuclear disarmament.

The third issue raised on the fringe of the G20 Summit was that of maritime security; specifically at the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz. Following the recent events in the region and the Fujairah incident and the attacks on the oil tankers, the United States took the opportunity to bring countries under its cover on the excuse of maritime security.

As a result, various American officials began consultations in this regard before the start of the G20 Summit; Brian Hook (US special representative on Iran) traveled first to the Middle East and then to Europe; the US acting secretary of defense traveled to Europe, and Mike Pompeo traveled first to the Persian Gulf, then to India and Australia. Washington officials at the G20 meeting stressed that mechanisms should be devised to ensure maritime security. The Americans also made suggestions in this respect but they have not been accepted by Europe yet. The European side argues that the US suggestions can increase insecurity in the region and are in some way a threat to Iran.

The fourth issue, which was discussed in brief on the sideline of the G20, was the issue of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear program including expression of some stances in this regard. Perhaps the main reason the issue was raised to some extent was that after the Japanese prime minister returned from Iran, he met with Trump in Osaka to evaluate Iran’s outlook; but the issue of Iran at the Osaka Summit was not a very serious issue. In fact, the serious issue raised in relation to the Islamic Republic of Iran at the G-20 Summit was more about the security of navigation in the Persian Gulf.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading