U.S Mechanism of Sanctions against Iran

2018/07/29 | Opinion

By Abdollah Farajirad   Strategic Council Online-Sanctions are used as a tool or effort for imposing pressure on a country or countries with the goal of forcing them to show specific behavior. The sanctions under UN Security Council can naturally make many countries satisfied to go along with. It means that the UN members are […]

By Abdollah Farajirad

 

Strategic Council Online-Sanctions are used as a tool or effort for imposing pressure on a country or countries with the goal of forcing them to show specific behavior.

The sanctions under UN Security Council can naturally make many countries satisfied to go along with. It means that the UN members are obliged to impose these sanctions like sanctions imposed on Iraq under Oil-for-Food Program by which many countries mostly abide. Eventually these sanctions paved the way for Saddam’s regime fall.

Some sanctions are imposed by lobbying and these days such sanctions are highlighted to which the sanctions Imposed by the U.S after withdrawing from Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) can be referred. In fact Washington is lobbying with different countries for imposing sanctions on Iran against the UN Security Council resolutions. Through these measures, the U.S is persuading or threatening some countries to follow its unilateral sanctions against Iran. Some countries are forced to abide by the U.S sanctions unless their interest will be in danger.

Given the U.S sanctions due to Imposed against Iran in November, it must be stressed that these sanctions are against the international laws and sanctions imposed prior to JCPOA. The same sanctions are imposed against Venezuela but sanctions on Iran are tougher and harder because Venezuela’ trade activities with the world are more limited and it mostly has trade cooperation with Latin America. Naturally, among Latin Americas’ countries Brazil has the leading role and in fact these countries are not in the position to impose the U.S policies on Venezuela.

While The U.S sanctions have some effects on Venezuela and made some crises,

the Inefficiency of the government leads the country to face with the increasing problems.

In regard to effectiveness of the unilateral sanctions it must be emphasized that these measures have some effects. For example, since the West sanction, Russia has lost %60 of its currency’s’ value. It must be mentioned that Russia’s sanctions are not as hard as Iran’s sanctions before JCPOA or the sanctions against Iraq prior to Saddam’s fall.

On the other hand, North Korea has experienced the worst economic situations in past 20 years so its leader is now trying to reach an agreement with the U.S in order to find a way to manage the country.

For the time being, the policy of pressure and coercion is on the Trump’s America agenda. Recently the deputy of Secretary of the U.S Treasury Department on his trip to Turkey announced that Iran was not Ankara’s friend but the U.S was Turkey’s ally and friend and if Ankara was to cooperate with Iran at the time of sanctions it would be faced with the U.S sanctions.

The U.S has started negotiations with China, Japan and India about Iran so Iran needs to use some mechanism to downgrade the effectiveness of Washington’s sanctions. Also Trump has taken harsh stance against Iran while previous U.S administrations tried to respect some norms for example South Korea, India or Japan could buy Iran’s oil but Trump Administration announced to reduce Iran’s oil exports to zero.

The U.S has withdrawn from JCPOA but because of the U.S problematic measures

regarding NATO, Paris climate agreement, tariff war with some countries, and Iran nuclear agreement as well, Washington’s allies are opposing White House actions so Iran can use this opportunity to futile the U.S plans to increase pressure against Tehran and Iranian nation.

……………………

 

 

 

 

.

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading