loader image

Strategic consequences of attempting unacceptable border changes in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online--Opinion: Baku claims based on paragraph 9 of the tripartite agreement that was clinched after the second Karabakh war on November 10, 2020, the right was given to the government of Baku to build through the territory of Armenia an exclusive "corridor" under Azerbaijan’s sovereignty to Nakhchivan. Hamid Khoshayand—Expert of regional issues

Baku government’s claim is that there is no such discussion in the tripartite agreement in the form that Azerbaijan is proposing and trying to realize it with aggressive military, security and political policies in the last two years. What is proposed in the agreement of November 10, 2020, is the creation of a transport “route of communication” between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan, including the unhindered movement of citizens, vehicles and goods, which is guaranteed by Armenia, and the control of transport by the FSB of Russia.

Despite the explicit statement of paragraph 9 of the tripartite ceasefire agreement regarding the establishment of a “communication route” under the supervision of Russia, and despite the fact that in this paragraph there is no name of “corridor”, “channel” or “passage”, as well as the exact cities and regions where the communication route passes and its “length” and “width”, we are still witnessing important challenging and controversial issues from Baku in this field.

An important question that is raised here is why the government of Azerbaijan, contrary to the provisions of the 2020 agreement and the provisions of international law, still insists on reopening the alleged corridor of “Zangezor” in an exclusive way?

Examining the developments of the last two years in the South Caucasus clearly shows that the government of Baku is pursuing interests in the alleged Zangezzor Corridor, with “territorial continuity” at the top of them, but it should not be overlooked that, in addition to Baku, Turkey is the most important beneficiary of the construction of the aforementioned corridor.

The current conflict in the South Caucasus is no longer over Nagorno-Karabakh and is not limited to Armenia and Azerbaijan, but has gained further dimensions and many players with strategic goals have entered it, Turkey being at the top because in recent years, the Turkish government has seriously placed the approach known as the “Turkish World” on the agenda of its foreign policy and seeks to form “Greater Turkistan”, so the main beneficiary of the creation of such a corridor is Turkey.

The most important function of the alleged Zangezzor Corridor, which is sometimes called the “Turkistan Corridor”, is to remove the biggest land and physical obstacle to the advancement of the Great Turkistan policy, which is related to Armenia and Sivnik province.

This is very important and dangerous from a strategic point of view, so that in 2020, in the midst of military conflicts between the military forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia, “Ibrahim Karagol”, the editor of “Yeni Shafaq” newspaper, an unofficial organ of the ruling party of Turkey, wrote on his personal page:

“Iran no longer has any border with Karabakh and should not be allowed to have a border with Armenia either; Nakhchivan should be connected to Azerbaijan and the road to Central Asia should be opened. Iran and Russia’s unchanging doctrine of preventing the integration of the Turkic world must be ended!” He also emphasized on his page, “The Karabakh war has just started and is considered the first step!”

Therefore, it is quite clear that the Karabakh conflict has practically become a “cover” for the advancement of strategic and long-term policies of some regional actors, which can lead to “dangerous strategic consequences”.

“Changing borders and geopolitics of the region” is the most important consequence in this regard. If the Zangezor Corridor is built with the coordinates claimed by the Baku government, it will cut off Iran’s communication lines with Armenia, and as a result, cut off one of Iran’s important transit routes to Europe. Disruption in Iran’s trade relations with Russia, Armenia and Georgia is another consequence of the alleged Zangezzor corridor. This issue will also reduce Iran’s geopolitical advantage in the Caucasus and disrupt the balance of communication lines in the region, which is not acceptable in any way.

The establishment of NATO in the South Caucasus and on the northern borders of Iran is another important consequence in this regard. According to the experiences of NATO’s activities and functions, this issue will definitely cause “weakening of the geopolitical order” and “expansion of insecurity and instability” in the South Caucasus in the long run, the waves of which will affect Azerbaijan in the first place. It is not without reason that in some political and media circles, the alleged corridor is also referred to as “NATO’s transfer corridor to the Caucasus”.

In 2020, “Adam Thomson”, the former representative of the British government in NATO, published a statement addressed to the British Prime Minister and wrote, “I request Mr. Prime Minister to use all his strength at this critical moment in history to take the last step to complete the 15 year project of NATO. “London, with the participation of the United States and the European Union in the form of NATO, should support Azerbaijan’s will to connect land to Nakhchivan!”

In conclusion, it should be emphasized that the Islamic Republic of Iran has a specific policy towards changing borders not only in the Caucasus, but in its surrounding environment. This is a “strategic issue” for Iran to be sensitive to any change in borders or geopolitical and geographical structures in its surrounding environment and to show a serious and tough reaction;

As seen in the issue of the Iraqi Kurdistan referendum, the Islamic Republic of Iran was against the independence of Iraqi Kurdistan and prevented it, and in the South Caucasus, the change of borders, which aggravates conflicts and disputes in the surrounding environment and creates security threats. It is “unbearable” foe Tehran and will not accept it.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Analysis of China’s Statement Regarding War in Ukraine, Beijing’s Motivations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Russian affairs says the Chinese statement lacked a specific proposal to exchange concessions between the two parties involved in the Ukraine war and open a passage for peace and only demanded to start negotiations. He added: During the Ukraine war, China, by buying cheap energy from Russia and increasing its energy reserves, has not only become an energy exporter for the first time but also gained more bargaining power against other energy exporters to China.

Reverse Migration from Occupied Territories, Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: If the pillars of forming a nation-state are the four factors of population, territory, government, and sovereignty, the Zionist regime, since its establishment and according to the provisions of international law, has lacked the factors mentioned earlier.
Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

Iran and Saudi relationship contribute to ending the war in Yemen

Strategic Council Online: The president of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said in a meeting with Hans Grundberg, the UN Special Envoy for Yemen that the restoration of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which was mediated by China, will contribute to ending the war in Yemen.

China’s Capacities, Challenges to Play a Role in Making Intl. Peace, Stability

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asia affairs considers China as having traditional and modern components of power in the world, which enables Beijing, to enjoy the possibility of balancing. He says: The Chinese have limitations in role-playing as an actor to make international peace and stability and generally they enter the challenges from the more trivial topics. This approach is considered a challenge to boost China’s mediating role and influence.

Dimensions, goals and consequences of Judaization of Bahraini textbooks

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: In September 2020, the Kingdom of Bahrain signed a reconciliation plan with the Zionist regime known as the “Abraham Accords”. Bahrain is the fourth Arab regime that has recognized the Zionist regime. During the past two years, Bahrain has been one of the Arab regimes that has continued to expand bilateral relations with Tel Aviv despite widespread domestic opposition.
Hamid Khoshayand- Expert of regional issues

A Glimpse at Developments of Intl. Order; a Year after Ukrainian War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs, saying that there is no sign of an end to the war in Ukraine in the current conditions, emphasized: Now the equations of the past are messed up and the new system is based on multilateralism and neutrality and relies on regionalism in which regional powers will cooperate and compete with each other at the international level.

Greece-US Arms Cooperation, Strengthening National Unity on Threshold of Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: During Anthony Blinken’s two-day trip to Greece, defense and security issues were major part of his talks with Greek officials. The Greek side expressed interest in purchasing fifth generation of F-35 fighter jets, and the US Secretary of State, while expressing satisfaction with the decision of the Athens government, announced support of the US administration. It is expected that the official response of the United States to Greece’s request for the purchase of 20+20 F-35 fighter planes will be announced in early April.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International affairs analyst

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Analysis of China’s Statement Regarding War in Ukraine, Beijing’s Motivations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Russian affairs says the Chinese statement lacked a specific proposal to exchange concessions between the two parties involved in the Ukraine war and open a passage for peace and only demanded to start negotiations. He added: During the Ukraine war, China, by buying cheap energy from Russia and increasing its energy reserves, has not only become an energy exporter for the first time but also gained more bargaining power against other energy exporters to China.

Reverse Migration from Occupied Territories, Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: If the pillars of forming a nation-state are the four factors of population, territory, government, and sovereignty, the Zionist regime, since its establishment and according to the provisions of international law, has lacked the factors mentioned earlier.
Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

Iran and Saudi relationship contribute to ending the war in Yemen

Strategic Council Online: The president of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said in a meeting with Hans Grundberg, the UN Special Envoy for Yemen that the restoration of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which was mediated by China, will contribute to ending the war in Yemen.

China’s Capacities, Challenges to Play a Role in Making Intl. Peace, Stability

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asia affairs considers China as having traditional and modern components of power in the world, which enables Beijing, to enjoy the possibility of balancing. He says: The Chinese have limitations in role-playing as an actor to make international peace and stability and generally they enter the challenges from the more trivial topics. This approach is considered a challenge to boost China’s mediating role and influence.

Dimensions, goals and consequences of Judaization of Bahraini textbooks

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: In September 2020, the Kingdom of Bahrain signed a reconciliation plan with the Zionist regime known as the “Abraham Accords”. Bahrain is the fourth Arab regime that has recognized the Zionist regime. During the past two years, Bahrain has been one of the Arab regimes that has continued to expand bilateral relations with Tel Aviv despite widespread domestic opposition.
Hamid Khoshayand- Expert of regional issues

A Glimpse at Developments of Intl. Order; a Year after Ukrainian War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs, saying that there is no sign of an end to the war in Ukraine in the current conditions, emphasized: Now the equations of the past are messed up and the new system is based on multilateralism and neutrality and relies on regionalism in which regional powers will cooperate and compete with each other at the international level.

Greece-US Arms Cooperation, Strengthening National Unity on Threshold of Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: During Anthony Blinken’s two-day trip to Greece, defense and security issues were major part of his talks with Greek officials. The Greek side expressed interest in purchasing fifth generation of F-35 fighter jets, and the US Secretary of State, while expressing satisfaction with the decision of the Athens government, announced support of the US administration. It is expected that the official response of the United States to Greece’s request for the purchase of 20+20 F-35 fighter planes will be announced in early April.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International affairs analyst

Loading