Future of Washington-Pyongyang Relations?

2019/01/09 | Economy, Opinion

Strategic Council Online: US-North Korea relations are currently stalled, that is neither a specific movement is being taken on the part of Washington, nor does Pyongyang want to meet the demands of the other side the way they wish. Ismail Bashari - Expert on Korean Peninsula affairs

President Donald Trump first tried to take political advantage of this relationship, that is he displayed a diplomatic gesture, then portrayed his talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un a victory before the world countries and claimed that he has been able to minimize one of the major threats in East Asia. Of course, in his talks with the North Korean leader, Trump had given some promises to the North Korean leader and in response, some steps were taken on the part of Pyongyang. North Korea stopped its missile tests and destroyed some facilities in the hope that the sanctions against his country would be reduced. In the second phase, which is a matter of discussions these days, it has been agreed that the United States end its joint exercises with Japan and South Korea and bring its nuclear presence in South Korea to an end, that is strategic weapons from other parts of the world would not be transferred to the Korean Peninsula and stocked there.

These were the goals the leaders of Washington and Pyongyang had put on the agenda following the Singapore talks. But over the past year, it was North Korea which fulfilled some of its commitments; the United States in return only reduced its war games in South Korea but took no action to ease the sanctions against Pyongyang, saying it would take action after denuclearization of North Korea.

This is while North Korea is not willing to take any action in this regard without getting significant concessions, most notably the disarmament of South Korea of US made tactical nukes.

Another point to be made here relates to the regional moves: Both South Korea and Japan have been trying to improve their relations with North Korea. In particular, South Korea has welcomed the current relationship and détente with its northern neighbour and there have been exchanges of visits by the top officials of the two countries. Therefore, there have been openings in Seoul-Pyongyang relations.

Meantime, the American pressures on China, on the one hand, and on Russia, on the other hand, at the international level, or in other words, the trade war against Beijing or the sanctions against Moscow, have made the two countries more reluctant towards resolving the Korean Peninsula problem, particularly if it is supposed to end in Washington’s favour.

Therefore, the United States has so far failed in persuading North Korea on denuclearization, and the issue is not even followed by South Korean officials so seriously.

Because from Seoul’s final perspective, the unity of the two Koreas is the target even if it occurs by creating a Confederation. Thus, it can be said that the two Koreas are willing to move towards forging unity by preserving the existing systems.

In fact, the South Korean nationalists might be interested to see a united Korea taking shape armed with nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. The analysis that the views of the South Korean President are fully in line with the outlooks of his American counterpart is incorrect.

From forging ties with Pyongyang, South Korea is pursuing its own special relations, but the United States seeks to portray talks with North Korea as a successful policy to the world and benefit from the same approach against Iran and other countries.

For this reason, there is already a type of stagnation in the Pyongyang-Washington talks and North Korea’s denuclearization. Therefore, it can be said that the success that Trump thought had achieved has now become an incomplete and almost ineffective gain. Unless the two parties put new talks on the agenda or the United States takes some practical measures to encourage North Korea to denuclearize. As a result, the question of whether the future of North Korean-US relations, as well as the talks between them, ends in these issues, especially Washington’s economic activity.

Because the sanctions have made life so hard for the people of North Korea, and its dealings with the countries of the world have been very difficult following the US pressures and Security Council resolutions. So Pyongyang seeks to reduce the sanctions so that it can take a breath.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

Loading