Miscalculation of Morocco in Getting Close to Tel Aviv

2022/04/26 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Establishment of relations between Morocco and the Zionist regime and signing of a security-military agreement between Rabat and Tel Aviv sparked anger of the Algerian government officials to the extent that political relations between the two neighboring countries were completely severed. Hassan Hanizadeh – Expert on the Middle East affairs

Morocco has been suffering from economic, political and social problems for years and is trying to get out of those crises by approaching the Israeli and American regimes.

Since the year 2000, Morocco has established political relations with the Zionist regime without any political or security justification, and subsequently opened the Israeli regime’s embassy in Rabat. Meanwhile, Algeria considers establishment of relations between the two regimes as a threat to its security.

During the reign of King Hassan II, the former king of Morocco, he secretly began the relationship with the Zionist regime; because the situation in the Arab world at that time was not as such that King Hassan II could make his relationship with that regime public. Although the issue of the relations between Morocco and the Zionist regime is not new, King Mohammed VI of Morocco believes that alignment with Israel and the Zionist lobby in the United States could lead to the exit of the Moroccan country from some economic, security and political crises.

Morocco faces a severe military and security challenge due to the 30-year conflict with the Polisario Front over declaration of independence of Western Sahara, which has affected the country’s economy. The Algerian-backed Polisario Social Democratic Front has been in a bloody conflict with the Moroccan army for nearly four decades. Therefore, the independence of Sahara from Morocco will mean the withdrawal of a large part of the Moroccan territory from the sovereignty of that country. Morocco claims that the Algerian army is providing military training and arms assistance to the members of the Polisario Front which comprises of 15,000 trained guerrillas, and that the two countries have repeatedly gone to the brink of military conflict.

On the other hand, the border disputes between Spain and Morocco over the two strategic regions of “Sebtah and Melilah”, which are under Spanish rule, which are under Spanish rule, have led the Kingdom of Morocco to a challenge with the European country of Spain and eventually the European Union. Thus, over the past two years, Morocco openly moved towards establishing an open relationship with the Zionist regime and signed a security-military agreement with it. The purpose of the agreement is for the Kingdom of Morocco to use Israel’s military and security capabilities to confront the Polisario Front guerrillas and the security threat of its neighbor Algeria.

The recent visits of the Israeli foreign and war ministers to Morocco are part of the regime’s efforts to establish spying and military bases in the region known as the Arab Maghreb. On the other hand, at the last meeting of the African Union, Morocco proposed that the Zionist regime enter the African Union as an observer member, which was strongly opposed by Algeria, Mauritania and Tunisia. Algeria, in regional and Arab meetings, has repeatedly called relations between the Arab countries and the Zionist regime contrary to the Arab League’s constitution and internal laws, and has seen the relationship between Morocco and the regime as a clear violation of joint Arab decisions. We also were witness to the recent joint meeting of the foreign ministers of Egypt, Morocco, the UAE and Bahrain with the foreign ministers of the Israeli regime and the US in the Negev Desert angered Algerian officials, and the last link between Algeria and Morocco was cut off. At that meeting, the plan called regional security engineering and formation of the Hebrew-Arab NATO to confront Iran and the Axis of Resistance were discussed by the foreign ministers of the four Arab countries, the United States and the Israeli regime which was confronted with the reaction of some Arab countries in North Africa such as Tunisia and Algeria. Therefore, Morocco has now distanced itself from some Arab countries in North Africa and is pursuing a path of alignment with the Zionist regime and threatening Algeria’s security, which is likely to lead to a border conflict between the two countries.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Change in Europe’s Political Approach to the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Ukraine’s attack on the Kursk region and seizing part of Russian territory is a turning point in the two-and-a-half-year war between Russia and Ukraine. In a full-scale psychological war, the United States and some European governments claimed that Iran was sending ballistic missiles to Russia. The claim aimed at putting pressure on Tehran and, in the meantime, justify arming Ukraine with long-range missiles from the United States and Europe. This is even though the Islamic Republic of Iran has clearly stated that it has not provided Russia with any missiles.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Change in Europe’s Political Approach to the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Ukraine’s attack on the Kursk region and seizing part of Russian territory is a turning point in the two-and-a-half-year war between Russia and Ukraine. In a full-scale psychological war, the United States and some European governments claimed that Iran was sending ballistic missiles to Russia. The claim aimed at putting pressure on Tehran and, in the meantime, justify arming Ukraine with long-range missiles from the United States and Europe. This is even though the Islamic Republic of Iran has clearly stated that it has not provided Russia with any missiles.

Loading