loader image

Prospect of relations between Iran and Pakistan in the Thirteenth Government

2021/08/04 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Commercial and economic relations between Islamabad and Tehran is not out of the political relations between the two neighbors and despite tremendous capacities are still delayed because of the lack of common and strong political determination in the two capitals. Somaye Marevati—Researcher of Afghanistan and Pakistan issues

Officials of the two countries have always talked about capacities, synergy of interests and such statements in the area of politics, culture and commerce; such as the promise of Imran Khan for upgrading the value of bilateral trade to five billion dollars; however, in action, and according to the available documents, this “inclination” alongside the existence of “necessity” has never been converted to an instigator for reviewing and reconstructing the relations. In order to see the level of relations between the two countries, we can refer to the figures and other indications and provide answers to such questions as: 1- Is there a direct flight between the capitals and important cities of the two countries? 2- Have universities and industrial hubs of the countries established strong links and connectivity? 3- Is the trade balance between the two countries significant in comparison with the capacities and transactions of other trade parties? Questions like this, if posed concerning Iran and Pakistan, definitely there is clearly a distance between the responses and remarks of the officials of the two countries.

It seems that “wills” have never gone beyond the negotiating table and conclusion of agreements. Alongside capacities, there are many factors push Tehran and Islamabad (at least on paper) to the necessity of strengthening regional convergence and links between the two countries in various areas. Now, thanks to capabilities and bottlenecks of Iran and Pakistan alongside the change in government in Iran, the question rises that “can the change of government in Iran exit the level of relations between Tehran and Islamabad from the present status and create movements in it?”. Reply to this question before the introduction of the cabinet ministers of the Thirteenth Government and studying its regional and economic approaches are difficult; however, there are indications for the presentation of the scenario of the creation of momentum in the relations between the two neighbors and its necessity which are important concerning Pakistan and apart from regional and global conditions the China’s inclination to proximity with Iran and Pakistan. If we accept this guess (creation of the Iran-China-Pakistan triangular), many clauses could have other meanings under it. Thanks to strategic relations between Pakistan and China and Iran and China, it seems that in the appropriate time, this triangular can be exploited by all the three players.

Pakistan is the fourth export market among countries neighboring Iran and enjoys high capacity for the qualitative and quantitative increase of commerce and trade with Iran. On the basis of estimations, with the establishment of necessary infrastructure, trade between the two countries could increase to 14 billion dollars per year. It is remarkable to mention that in the first nine months of the Iranian calendar year of 1399, the total bilateral trade between Iran and Pakistan exceeded 840 million dollars out of which 710 million dollars were Iran exports to Pakistan and included industrial and chemical productions, building blocks, agro products and food in more than 110 tariff codes. This is while on the basis of preferential trade agreement between Iran and Pakistan (2007), Iran reduced the tariff of 309 imported commodities from Pakistan and Pakistan reduced the tariff of 333 Iranian commodities; however, today, more than 60 percent of the commodities agreed between the two countries are not traded and since the implementation of the preferential trade agreement between the two countries, the trade balance never exceeded 1.3 billion dollars.

Attention to the capacities and limitations of the Pakistani side and re-designing of relations should be the top propriety of the new government in Iran; one of the weak points of the track taken so far with Pakistan, has been the lack of continuity of relations and lack of attention to consolidating strong ties (which currently exist in political relations) between the private sectors of the two countries on the other side of the border. For example, cities like Karachi and Heydarabad are considered as the commercial and industrial hubs of Pakistan and can (at least on paper) form the basis for links with Iranian cities of Tabriz, Shiraz and Isfahan and pave the ground for stronger connectivity between the private sectors of Iran and Pakistan; also, exploiting multilateral treaties such as ECO, D8 and international chambers of commerce can pave the way for this.

As mentioned earlier, alongside the absence of proper infrastructure such as road transit and banking relations, the main factor of the status quo in relations between the two countries is the “determination” of the officials of the two countries which if moves towards “will” can definitely facilitate the way for many agreements and transactions. Therefore, the most important step is to upgrade agreements with a view to reviewing needs. What is transpiring in the region would definitely impact the level of interests of Iran and Pakistan. One of the main strategic blunders is the influence of relations by the unsolvable fight between India and Pakistan and Pakistan and Afghanistan as well. As Iran despite differences between Tehran and Riyadh respects relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, Iran should also seek a similar approach from other players especially Pakistan; this difficulty can be seen clearly in the issue of Chabahar and developments in Afghanistan. Cleverness of the Iranian side for designing a track which could get us out of this bottleneck, can definitely inject new energy in the relations between the two countries.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Single-State, Iran’s solution to the Palestinian crisis

Strategic Council online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, in an interview with France 24 Español, explained Iran’s approach to the Gaza war and outlined the region’s future after this bitter historical event.

Organizing Immigration Issue, Cause of Escalation of Divergence in EU

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European affairs stated that the European Union is faced with the challenge of conflict in some different opinions and policies among member countries, which can affect the overall approach to immigration in Europe. She noted that when the member states follow different paths, the principle of solidarity and cooperation of the Union is distorted and can challenge the unity of the Union.

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

Loading