Opportunities for Iran’s Cooperation with Central Asian States

2021/01/16 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The Islamic Republic of Iran can use the principle of balancing and diversification, to increase its presence in the Central Asian region. Vali Kouzegar Kaleji - senior researcher at the Center for Strategic Studies of the President’s Office

The five Central Asian states, namely Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, have two important principles in their foreign policy that are applied in relations with all countries; first is diversity and the second is balancing. These countries are willing to cooperate with Russia, China, Europe and the United States at the level of major powers and at the level of regional powers, Iran, Turkey, India and other countries are in their foreign policy basket. They do not want any power in Central Asia to be the dominant power. In fact, those countries want to balance relations with China through Russia; through China with Russia and through those two countries, with the United States. In the meantime, the field of the Iranian activities in Central Asia can be examined within the same context; therefore, the Central Asian countries do not want to create any bloc against other countries in the region.

In fact, the Central Asian countries are concerned that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization could become an anti-Western bloc or an Eastern NATO; therefore, those five countries have no desire at all to openly confront other countries, regions or other treaties. They are working with the United States as one of their partners, but this cooperation will continue until the time when Washington would not dominate the affairs of all Central Asian countries.

Their relations with China are within the same context; the Central Asian countries separated from the Soviet Union in the 1990s and today, with the exception of Kazakhstan, China is the first trading partner of four other countries. At the same time, Sinophobia has now spread to some extent in Central Asia, so they seek to reduce Beijing’s role.

Under such circumstances, there is a good capacity for the Islamic Republic of Iran to enter into more interaction and cooperation with those countries, taking into account the principle of diversity and balancing mentioned at the beginning of this article. It should be noted, however, that Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan do not want China to replace Russia or the United States, or Iran to replace China. Those countries do not want Iran, Russia and China to enter into cooperation in confrontation with the US influence.

If Iran looks at cooperation with Central Asian countries from this angle, the most important area of ​​cooperation between the parties is in the field of transit, either railroad, road or airlines. Also in the field of agricultural exports, cooperation with the Eurasian Economic Union and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Maritime Trade in the Caspian Sea with Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan could be placed on the agenda of bilateral cooperation. At the same time, security and law enforcement cooperation in the field of counter-narcotics, counter-terrorism and extremism, especially with a focus on Afghanistan, will be welcomed by Central Asian countries.

Iran can use the existing opportunities in order to strengthen its foothold in Central Asia. We must first assess what percentage of the region’s imports and exports are for Iran. In fact, we must first strengthen our foothold and expand our influence economically.

As a result, the Islamic Republic of Iran can use the principle of balancing and diversification in this region to increase its presence. Under such circumstances, of course, in some areas, cooperation between Iran with Russia and China will be formed.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading