Moscow’s Realistic Approach to Destructive US Approach on Iran

2020/09/29 | interview, Politics, Top News

Strategic Council Online - An international affairs analyst said Russia too has come to the conclusion that the US is pursuing a kind of pure international insurgency and is violating all the norms in the world. He said: Russia and Iran well understand each other’s interests under the status quo and both respect interests of each other that will guarantee continuation of cooperation.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Hassan Beheshtipour, referred to Moscow’s realistic approach as well as Washington’s destructive approach to Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and said: Iran-Russia relations should be examined in the three bilateral, regional and international general dimensions. Iran-Russia relations have been clearly expanding, at least since Putin’s third presidential term, and have taken on different dimensions during his fourth term.

He said regional cooperation is part of the reason for Russia’s rapprochement with Iran, noting that the most successful of which was in Syria. He added: The two countries were able to help resolve a major crisis in Syria known as the ISIS and clashed with the terrorist forces active there. It is very important that a bilateral cooperation turns into a regional cooperation.

The international affairs analyst called the issue of JCPOA and its related issues as being international due to the participation of six powers and said: Parallel with Iran’s comprehensive cooperation with the IAEA, Russia’s turn to Iran increased step by step. This helped Russia and China to defend Iran’s position decisively. At the same time, Russia tried to bring its international positions closer to Iran, especially in the case of JCPOA, and play an important role in preventing the adoption of two anti-Iranian resolutions.

Beheshtipour continued by emphasizing that the adoption of these positions was also in Russia’s interest: Russia intends to confront the US unilateralism and show that the time when the US intends to impose its idea on the international community has come to an end and the US President cannot, by his own discretion, interpret international law in his favor and, more importantly, enforce it!

Russia’s Constructive Position on Iran the Outcome of Years of Joint Efforts

Referring to the Russian Foreign Minister’s stance in criticizing US actions against Iran in the region and that the hopeless and disappointing approach leads to a stalemate, he said: If we see Mr. Lavrov’s firm position, this approach turns back to several years of work in the relations between Iran and Russia. Russia and Iran have moved forward step by step over the years, removing obstacles on the way of their relations one by one.

Meanwhile, Beheshtipour did not consider the relations successful economically, adding: Unfortunately, Iran-Russia economic relations are still far from what they should be. But, the two countries have made good progress in security, diplomatic and political cooperation and have been able to coordinate more than in the past; however, this does not mean that all problems are solved. There are still differences of opinion that can be resolved through joint efforts.

The international affairs expert said: It is important that Russia and China in relation to Iran witnessed that the country in the international arena tried to keep its policies transparent and remain committed within the framework of the JCPOA. Therefore, this shift in perspective of the two countries took place gradually and they moved towards very close cooperation, which some people are interested in calling it strategic cooperation. But, I believe that relations have not yet reached that level and they are moving towards it.

He continued by referring to the remarks of the Russian Foreign Minister regarding the ineffectiveness of sanctions against Iran and said: Since 2014, Russia has been faced with numerous sanctions by the US and Europe and today it is more sympathetic to Iran and takes a tougher stance on sanctions. Mr. Lavrov has even offered to mediate between Iran and the US, which does not appear to be the case at the moment due to the continuation of US hostile policies.

Beheshtipour emphasized: In any case, Russia seems quite serious in its current policy. It should be noted that Russia’s interests are also a matter of consideration here. In the current situation, Russia’s interests are also in conflict with US interests and in cooperation with Iran. Their interests also require them to confront with the American unilateralism. This is not just about JCPOA.

In view of Russia too, the US pursues pure international insurgency

Referring to US actions in unilaterally withdrawing from international treaties and accords, he said: Russia has also come to the conclusion that the US is pursuing a kind of pure international insurgency and is violating all the norms of the world. They know they have to restrain the US. Even Europe, as an ally of the US, stands against it. The statements of the foreign ministers of Germany, France and Britain clearly show that they oppose the US unilateral policy and do not even act on it. The issuance of such statements is an important action against the US.

Better Understanding of Russia and Iran of Common Interests

Beheshtipour added: Russia and Iran under the current circumstances well understand and recognize each other’s interests and the two sides respect mutual interests which will guarantee continuation of cooperation, even if they disagree on some issues. The two countries have been working together successfully for several years. In fact, the secret of continuation of Russian-Iranian cooperation is that the two sides have recognized and respected each other’s interests and have been able to adopt the right policies against US unilateralism at the regional level and have achieved positive results. Even if Russia-US relations improve in the future, there is no conflict with the strategic cooperation that will take shape with Iran in the future.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading