Reinforcement of North Korea Missile Capability & Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: After a six-month cessation of missile tests, in September and October 2021North Korea launched a range of missile tests containing an ultra-sonic new missile (a very sophisticated weapon that is being developed by military powers like the U.S. and Russia), a recently developed new Cruise Missile, and a ballistic missile launched from a train. Zeinab Farhadi, Researcher on East Asian affairs

Although according to South Korean military authorities, the ultra- sonic missile is at its early phases of development but the Cruise and ballistic missiles tests indicate the remarkable development of North Korean capability in attacking targets in South Korea and Japan both of which are hosting the U.S. forces in their soil.

Reinforcement of missile capabilities of North Korea, particularly in missile and nuclear areas caused concerns among countries where they are geographically located in a very short distance from it. As two strategic allies of the U.S. in East Asia, South Korea and Japan are the most vulnerable counties against any missile attack staged by North Korea. Having considered the increasing concerns in these countries, it can be interpreted that as the military capabilities of North Korea increase, the security and military relations of the regional countries with the U.S. strengthen further, on the other side, the reinforcement of internal military capabilities will be on the agenda of the country’s politicians. This is particularly very sensible in connection with Japan.

A review of Japan’s defensive documents in 2021 indicates that North Korea and China have been assessed as two major threats for the national security of the country. While China is considered to be the long term threat with less danger, North Korea is introduced as immediate threat and principal concern for Japan. The reasonable result of such understanding about North Korea is over-investment in military field and conclusion of high value contracts to reinforce and update missile systems and other military capabilities. Therefore, arms race in the region is the first foresee-able consequence of North Korea missile tests.

In connection with relations between South Korea and North Korea, one should admit that missile test of North Korea would leave unpleasant consequences on relations between two Koreas. During the recent years, President Moon Jae-in made lots of efforts for amelioration of relations between the two countries. As we witnessed he played a major role in the course of negotiations between the U.S. and North Korea in 2019. Whereas the next presidential election of South Korea will be held in spring 2022, it seems that in the light of recent measures taken by North Korea and likely defeat of Moon Jae-in’s policies for better relations with North Korea, his legacy and the supporters’ idea for unification of two Koreas or at least détente in relations between the two countries will face a serious challenge. Moreover, it seems that reinforcement of military capabilities will be included in the agenda of South Korean authorities. As we witnessed recently, South Korea tested a ballistic missile launched from a sub-marine.

In connection with the U.S. and the negotiations of the country with North Korea, it should be said that with the escalation of provocative measures of North Korea one can’t be optimist about the future of negotiations. Ever since Joe Biden took office in January 2021, North Korea made no effort to renew her talks with the U.S. Unwillingness of Biden’s Administration to take “necessary measures” (for example lifting parts of sanctions) against the measures took by North Korea in 2018 such as cessation of nuclear and long-range missiles tests have intensified pessimism of Pyongyang towards Washington policies.

To conclude the analysis, it should be said the background of missile and nuclear crisis of North Korea indicates that the country has always been heading towards boosting her military capabilities and behaviors which are considered by her enemies as hostile and provocative. However, it should not be forgotten that the country is trying to leave no stone unturned in diplomatic field along with following her military policies. For example, it is now four years since North Korea has not tested one of her long range missiles with capability to reach the U.S. mainland. In this connection, Young Mo-Jin, professor of North Korean Studies at Seoul University believes:” North Korea takes care not to go beyond the red lines, amid all missile tests, North Korea showed that she is interested in negotiations”. Taken the background into the account, it seems that North Korea will never take any step towards nuclear disarmament, until and unless a measure is taken by the U.S. to fulfil the declared pledges.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading