Unacceptable Ambitions of Azeri President to Change Geopolitics of Caucasus

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on international and regional affairs, referring to the destructive role of the Zionist regime in the Caucasus and considering the confession of the President of Azerbaijan on using Israeli drones, said: The recent provocative actions of the government of President Ilham Aliyev in holding a joint maneuver with Turkey and the Zionist regime along Iran’s northwestern borders and Aliyev’s accusations against Iran within the context of his family’s long-standing and unacceptable ambition to change the geopolitics of the Caucasus can be analyzed.

Hassan Hanizadeh, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations said: The military presence of the Zionist regime in two sensitive areas of the Caspian Sea and the Caucasus and near the borders of Iran, at the initiative of Ilham Aliyev, endangers the security of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Noting that there have been several recent unfriendly moves by Turkey and Azerbaijan against Iran’s national security, Hanizadeh stressed: Such moves are manifested in the unjustifiable conduct of a series of military exercises of the two countries with Pakistan and with the Zionist regime.

According to the expert, the accusations of Ilham Aliyev against Iran in an interview with the official Turkish news agency “Anadolu Agency” were strange, unexpected, and destructive for relations between the two countries and contrary to the common interests of the two countries.

The expert on regional affairs continued: The Azerbaijan government has recently fined more than 60 trucks carrying Iranian goods to Armenia under the pretext that they should pay transit fees to Baku by changing the joint borders of Azerbaijan and Armenia, and even detained two Iranian drivers illegally.

He continued: This is despite the fact that before the Karabakh war between Azerbaijan and Armenia, because part of the region was under Armenian rule, there was no problem for the transit of Iranian trucks from Karabakh and Nakhchivan under a joint agreement between Iran, Azerbaijan and Armenia.

Hanizadeh said: But apparently Baku’s relative victory in the second Karabakh war, backed by Turkey and the Zionist regime, has made Ilham Aliyev very proud and he is apparently trying to change the geopolitics of the Caucasus in his favor, which is completely unacceptable.

The expert on international affairs also commented on the role of foreign governments, especially the Zionist regime, in the tensions, adding: Using the military and espionage capacity of the Zionist regime and the political and financial support of Turkey to try to change this geopolitics and create insecurity on the northwestern borders of the Islamic Republic of Iran is considered one of the biggest political and security mistakes of Ilham Aliyev.

Hanizadeh added: It should be noted that the notion that President of Azerbaijan is able to pave the way for the Zionist regime to enter the region and the Caspian Sea by changing the geopolitics of the Caucasus is a political illusion, because the environmental conditions of this country and the region will not permit such inspiration to Aliyev.

The expert on regional affairs, referring to the composition of Azerbaijan’s population of 10 million, over 70 percent of whom have religious inclinations towards the Islamic Republic of Iran, noted: Those people will never allow the ambitious President of Azerbaijan to have an adventure.

Regarding Iran’s possible reaction to such behaviors, he said: Iran has a lot of pressure tools that can use at the right time and right place to moderate Ilham Aliyev’s aggressive behavior, but in the current situation, Iran prefers diplomatic solutions.

Hanizadeh also referred to the beginning of the exercise of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran under the title of Kheibar Conquerors on the northwest borders and said: This exercise is considered as a serious warning to the Azerbaijan government that under no circumstances will Iran tolerate the change of borders in the countries of the region and the existence of an illegitimate Zionist regime along its borders.

He continued: Also, the measures of Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government in inciting Ilham Aliyev will incur heavy costs for the government of the Development and Justice Party.

Hanizadeh pointed out that in 2016, the Turkish president faced a breathtaking coup by the army and sought help from Iran at Istanbul Airport, adding: At that time, the officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran sincerely provided him with all their resources and he was rescued from a political, military and security crisis that was about to put his rule in history forever.

In continuation, he stressed: Therefore, both Ilham Aliyev and Recep Tayyip Erdogan should know that Iran is a friendly country and has a lot in common with those two countries, but it will never allow the above-mentioned ambitions to become operational, especially the footsteps of the Zionist regime, which is the red line of the Islamic Republic of Iran, can also be seen in some of those movements.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading