The causes and consequences of stopping Turkey’s participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Syrian affairs stated that the suspension of Turkey's participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria means that operations in that region are definitive and that a political deadlock is created to reduce the conflict in northern Syria, adding that Americans once again refused to back the Kurds in Syria and Moscow’s and Washington's cooperation with Ankara and falling short of Turkey's preferences in northern Syria show their need for Turkey in the developments related to the war in Ukraine.

Mostafa Najafi, referring to the report by the Russian Defense Ministry which suggested that Turkey has stopped participating in joint patrols in Syria, and terrorists are planning to use drones to attack Russia’s Hmeimim air base in Syria, told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that “in the last two-three weeks, we have seen new developments in northern Syria. After the terrorist attack that happened in Istanbul, Erdogan spoke about the fourth phase of Turkey’s operation in Syria in order to reduce domestic political pressures and manage the upcoming elections”.

He added that the announcement of Turkey’s fourth operation in northern Syria has created new developments in that region; Among other things, the mediation of the Russians between the Kurds and the Turkish government seems to have almost failed. “The Kurds announced that they do not agree with the things that have been transferred to them, including the distance of 30 kilometers from the borders of Turkey. Also, they do not agree to hand over PKK officials and the Kurdish groups in Syria. These issues increased tensions.”

This analyst of Syrian affairs stated that according to the published news, the first phase of Turkey’s military operation in Syria will begin soon.

He added that the Turks have largely used their bargaining power against the United States and the Russians, who have opposed Turkey’s operations in northern Syria until now and have used and increased this power due to the developments caused by the war in Ukraine. In this situation, Turkey’s hands have been largely opened for operations in northern Syria.

Najafi added that it seems that Russia’s previous opposition to Turkey’s operation in northern Syria is not 100 percent present, and the United States has left Turkey’s hand open and given them the green light.

He said that the patrols that were carried out were also in line with the agreements regarding Astana and the reduction of tension in northern Syria. Therefore, the suspension of Turkey’s participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria means that operations in that region are definitive and create a political deadlock to reduce tension in northern Syria.

He added that it seems that this operation will start soon from the “Tal Rifat” area, but it is not clear whether it will spread to the “Manbij” or “Ain al-Arab” areas, but most likely Turkey will try to push the Kurdish forces towards “Hasakah”.

Recalling that Erdogan’s strategy so far has been to use external developments in line with internal and political issues for election purposes, Najafi added that Erdogan is under severe pressure from his opposition groups and this issue is more severe especially in relation to refugees, so he is trying to reduce some of the political pressure by launching a new operation in Syria.

He added that “of course, this action can turn into a double-edged sword and have the opposite result; Even though, according to the published news, Bashar Assad has refused to meet with Erdogan. This reaction could be the consequence of Turkey’s decision to send troops to northern Syria.”

This expert on Syrian issues stated that the attack on northern Syria overshadows many projects related to Turkey’s foreign policy in Syria, and emphasized that certainly, the normalization of relations could have benefited Erdogan, but considering the developments and resistance of the Kurds, as well as dissatisfaction of the Syrian government, we will witness the consequences for Erdogan personally himself. In addition, this operation will greatly increase the instabilities in northern Syria, an issue that will not benefit Turkey internally and externally.

Referring to the numerous meetings between the security officials of Turkey and Syria in the past year, regarding the consequences of Turkey’s operation in northern Syria on political processes, he said that despite these negotiations and the mediation of the Russians to hold a meeting between Assad and Erdogan, until the fate of some cases is not clear, the normalization of the relations between these two countries will not happen. Anyway, Turkey is present in Idlib as an occupying force and supports the opposition forces of the Syrian government.

Najafi reminded that Turkey’s expansionism and military campaigns in northern Syria by damaging the country’s territorial integrity continue to accumulate threatening perceptions between the two countries. The Americans are also dissatisfied with any normalization of relations between Turkey and Syria and try to prevent it; Because this normalization of relations can strengthen the international legitimacy of the Syrian government and help establish political and security stability in this country.

This analyst of Syrian affairs emphasized that the Astana process was almost successful despite all the moves that Turkey made in northern Syria, but one of the main reasons that caused the Russians to be soft towards Turkey’s operations is the war in Ukraine. In any case, Russia is currently cooperating extensively with Turkey, especially in relation to circumventing sanctions. This issue makes them unable to apply the necessary pressure regarding the Syrian issue. Knowing about Russia’s strategic needs, Turkey put a lot of pressure to start a new phase of its operations in northern Syria and almost succeeded in imposing its preferences on Russia.

Referring to the statements of the American officials that they have ended their joint operations with the Kurds, he said that the Americans have once again abandoned the Kurds in Syria, and Moscow and Washington’s cooperation with Ankara shows their need for Turkey in the developments related to the war in Ukraine which has caused them to fall short of Turkey’s preferences in northern Syria.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading