Challenges ahead of Brussels Negotiations on Southern Caucasia

2022/06/17 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Director of Caucasia Studies Foundation said:” it seems that the objectives of Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan on making Zangezur corridor follow mostly non-economic aspects, while territorial, political as well as security objectives to make corridor will face the opposition of the regional players.

Jafar Khashe’ in an interview with the site of Strategic Council on Foreign Relations referred to the remarks made by the president of the Republic of Azerbaijan as saying to achieve an agreement with Armenia to demark the borders and Zangezur corridor, and noted:” if the corridor’s objective follows merely the removal of blockade on connecting itineraries, there were details predicted in the agreement achieved between the two countries and mediated by Russia in 2020 for which the regional countries including Iran have no serious reservation about it. The itineraries were already there and had been used”.

Having stressed on the importance of countries’ approach on Zangezur corridor, Khashe’ said:” the way the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey look at the Zangezur corridor is different from the raison d’etre of the corridors; however, corridors have long term geopolitical objectives too, but they are mostly expected to serve for their economic application. Even, countries that made those corridors, generally use names that cause promotion of a kind of synergy among the regional countries and to meet the interests of all players and parties involved.

“Zangezur” Has an Offensive Concept

Having emphasized on the necessity of a stable perspective for the corridors, he continued:” We do not notice such aspects for the corridor that the Republic of Azerbaijan is following. At first stage, the name “Zangezur” has an offensive concept within itself coupled with territorial claims. By such measures, it seems what the countries involved pursue, has nothing to do with the nature, the essence and the application of corridors; instead, they follow territorial, political and security objectives”.

The expert of Caucasia issues stressed that such approach will neither promote the cooperation of the regional players nor calm down their reactions as well as their protests. He added:” we already witnessed that after the Brussels meeting, the authorities of the Republic of Azerbaijan said we reached an agreement on the corridor, while the Armenian Foreign Ministry rejected it. Now, while Aliev dealt with the issue in the course of his phone conversation with Erdogan, neither he provided any details and nor the Armenian authorities had reaction on the issue”.

He said:” in case of countries opposition, their cooperation will be lessened, and the corridor will not achieve any success in long term. As such plans bring into consideration the interests of only two parties involved, its costs will increase, and will not be able to serve its goals and to establish peace and tranquility. Thus, will gradually proceed with tensions as well as non-cooperation of countries involved”.

 

Non-Economic Objectives of Turkey & the Republic of Azerbaijan

Having stated that Armenia will not agree with losing the control of a part of its territory, Khashe’ expressed:” unfortunately, it seems that Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan follow mostly non-economic objectives, because even now there are other connecting roads that can link the two countries together. In Georgia’s section, a lot of investments have already been made, Iran’s itinerary has also proved to be reasonably economic, safe and stable. These itineraries are completely justifiable; from economic point of view, new investments have no justification”.

Director of Caucasia Studies Foundation said:” agreement was made at the Brussels meeting to establish a commission to review borders. In order to prevent tensions, the negotiations should ultimately proceed; in the meantime, it must be taken into consideration that which map was the basis to determine the demarcation? and chronologically, which period was taken into consideration about the basis of the borders between the two republics? According to the media reports, it seems that both countries agreed in Brussels on borders of 1993, but the Republic of Azerbaijan expected earlier that borders from 1918 to 1926 as to be the basis of demarcation”.

Having underscored that the will to determine the demarcation and to settle the current disputes exists between the two sides, specially Armenia, he continued:” the regional countries are not willing to any movement (of ownership) in large territories and a meaningful change in international borders. This will neither be welcomed by the Arminian society, and nor the government of the country will definitely accept such a situation under the pressure of the public opinion of Armenians inside and outside of the country”.

Khashe’ reminded:” While rejecting the claim raised by the president of the Republic of Azerbaijan on Zangezur, Armen Gevorgyan, Secretary of the National Security Council of Armenia has also announced that it is not possible to exist any corridor in the territory of Armenia and all agreements achieved in Brussels are just about the reopening of transport roads. Yet, the opponents of Pashinyan accuse him to withdraw against Baku and to hide agreements he made with Azeri side as he did about what happened in 2020 war”.

The expert of Caucasia issues said:” on what the Armenian government has announced about the results of Brussels meeting, it has been touched upon that in the course of negotiations, agreements have been made on the continuation of talks in line with reopening of regional links and start of the work of the commission that deals with the border demarcation and providing security; the talks will continue in July or August. The Chair of the EU Council also announced that both sides reached an agreement on the removal of the existing impediments for transit between the two countries and facilitating of transport between Nakhichevan and main territory of Azerbaijan as well as some regions in Armenia using the Azeri territory”.

In the meantime, Khashe’ spelled out:” Azerbaijan had an upper hand in Brussels negotiations, and the trend of talks has so far been to their benefit”.

 

Iran Will Not Accept Any Change of International Borders

Having stressed that Iran will not accept any change of international borders, he added:” We witness the heating up of Brussels negotiations in circumstances when due to war in Ukraine, Russia can pay less attention to Southern Caucasia, but definitely as far as results and final negotiations are concerned, there is little possibility to succeed on agreement without Russia, and thus any agreement will not last long. Russia’s reservations should be met in the two republics, otherwise, agreements will not be durable. Having Russia involved in war, one can not expect substantial changes in Caucasia will take place without paying attention to the country’s interests.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading