Consequences of Sweden, Finland Membership in NATO

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A member of the faculty of the Institute for Strategic Studies said that membership of Sweden and Finland is a turning point in NATO power and the global balance among great powers, adding: Given this level of differences between Russia and NATO, the situation will not return to the time before the Ukraine war, Russia may want to change the situation and, for example, Putin will not participate in the 2024 elections and with the presence of someone else in power, Russia’s position will be adjusted and reformed.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Mehdi Shapouri, referring to the decision of Sweden and Finland to join NATO and submitting their request to the Secretary General of the military alliance, Jens Stoltenberg, noted: Finland has the longest border with Russia and this is an important strategic development that NATO becomes Russia’s new neighbor with a 1,300-kilometer border.

Saying that Sweden and Finland have increased their military cooperation with NATO militarily since 2014 and after the annexation of Crimea, he said: Although this integration in practice has happened before and is now only being recognized, this recognition also has consequences, and if Russia gets into tension with Sweden and Finland, NATO will come to their defense. Under such circumstances, Russia will be faced with limitations.

The expert on international affairs, saying that NATO expansion to the north will have strategic implications for Russia, noted: Sweden and Finland were neutral during the Cold War, and their joining to Russia’s enemies would impose heavy security and military costs on Moscow in the Baltic Sea and this concentration and increase in costs has detrimental consequences for Russia. Russia has announced that international military activity in the North is on the rise, and that turning the North into an international arena for military operations is a nuisance to which it cannot remain indifferent.

Shapouri continued: Sweden and Finland believe that Russia by attacking Ukraine, has shown that it is unpredictable and that they should seek to improve their security, but by doing so, Russia will also create challenges for those countries, however, those challenges remain to the extent that they do not lead to confrontation with NATO. In fact, Russia could not do more in the current situation, despite the threats it initially made. Moscow has already cut off gas exports to Finland and announced it would build more military bases in the region. Given Finland’s growing economic dependence on Russia, such measures will pose challenges to the country.

Sweden, Finland membership; new blood in NATO veins

The member of the faculty of the Research Institute for Strategic Studies, saying that Russia will suffer from the recent developments, added: Membership of Sweden and Finland is certainly a turning point in NATO power and the global balance among the big powers. We have already seen a decline in NATO cohesion, and Trump had also announced that NATO is an obsolete alliance; but with such developments, new blood flowed in the veins of NATO and the bonds of unity within that military alliance became fresh.

He pointed to China’s position on NATO expansion and its feeling of threat to the movements of the military alliance and its aggressive approach, adding: Sweden and Finland membership would increase NATO military strength and this issue, in the face of rivalries that exists between the West and Russia as well as the United states and China, is considered as a strong point for the West.

Referring to Turkey’s opposition to membership of Finland and Sweden in NATO and the technical issues that NATO has announced for that membership, Shapouri said: Those two countries have completely different conditions with regard to Ukraine and meet the standards required for NATO membership. By increasing their military budget to 2 percent, they have brought this figure to the level required by NATO.

He added: In fact, because of their feeling of being threatened, they were willing to join the alliance, and this decision was not initially made by NATO. Meanwhile, Turkey will resolve the membership issues of the two countries through negotiations and receiving concessions, and the Turkish foreign minister welcomed the diplomacy and announced that he would ask Sweden and Finland for written guarantees.

Referring to Russia’s threats to deploy missile systems and establish military bases in Kaliningrad, the international affairs expert said: In the current situation, Russia cannot escalate tensions; ultimately, however, the nature of Russia’s relations with NATO, as well as Sweden and Finland, depends on the fate of the Ukraine war and the status of sanctions against Russia. If the Ukraine war escalates, tensions between NATO and Russia will escalate exponentially; but an agreement between Russia and Ukraine will ease tensions.

Non-return of Russia-NATO relations to conditions before Ukraine war

He continued: Given this level of differences between Russia and NATO, the situation will not return to before the Ukraine war. Such differences will be at the same level at best and will increase at worst condition. Russia may only want to change the situation and disrupt the scene with changes; for example, Mr. Putin will not run in the 2024 elections or will step down and Russia’s position will be adjusted with the presence of another person in power.

He reminded: Although Russia had a good relationship with NATO a decade or two after the Cold War, but NATO has been Russia’s number one enemy for almost a decade, and this issue will not go away in the short term, and the two sides will continue to confront each other. Although it was hoped that those tensions would be managed through occasional treaties and agreements, and that the Ukraine war would now end in an agreement, however the war cut off communications and made the return through the same path difficult.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading