French Middle East Policy & Its Utilitarian Role in Nuclear Talks

2022/01/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After the conclusion of French weapons deal with the UAE, we witnessed a wave of internal and external critiques which assessed the French military attitude contrary to human rights attitude of the European Union, but due to some reservations, the European Union affiliated institutions remained tight-lipped in this respect. Dr. Abbass Sarvestani, Graduated in European Studies, Tehran University

The understanding of the French tough positions in JCPOA is impossible without the understanding of the origins of its Middle East policies or more precise to say, without the studying Macron doctrine in the Middle East region. After the U.S. withdrawal from the Persian Gulf and the presence of countries like China and Russia to fill its vacuum, French government has also started movements to become, at least, part of the power equation.

Macron visits to Lebanon and his presence in Baghdad and his meeting with Barham Saleh Iraqi President, Mustafa Al-Kazimi Prime Minister and Nechirvan Barzani President of the Kurdistan region, his visits of November 2021 to Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE and conclusion of Rafael Weapons deal, of which some analysts consider it as appeasement of the U.S. Administration to France to compensate AUKUS agreement must be analyzed in line with this.

France Effort to Play an Effective Role in the Middle East

Although Middle East visits and boosting the French military presence in East Mediterranean have short term economic and presidential campaign objectives, but at macro level analysis indicate that France has cast its eyes to post-American Middle East and in an unilateralism ear of the U.S. that started during Trump, and distrust to post – Brexit Britain, and the development in post – Merkel German foreign policy, and thus makes effort to revive the Gaullistic tradition in French foreign policy and to become one of the effective players of Middle East region.

Middle East region has always had special importance not only in French foreign policy but also in its society, politics, history and culture, and has been an arena for its international ambition for over 200 years. After the World War II and weakening of position of European countries at international scene, cross- border ambitions of France in this region went into decline. But at the present situation that seems Joe Biden is determined to reduce of the U.S. presence in the Middle East, Emanuel Macron, French President is heading to the opposition direction.

Although France took a relative realistic approach against the Middle East after the Arab Spring took place, and because of its concern about the extension of instability of the region to Europe and an increase in terrorist attacks, it was after the stability of the region and giving assurance and boosting security cooperation with its regional partners to preserve the balance in regional power, but during the present era, the Americans reluctance to remain present in the region and the return of Russia to the policy of major powers in the region have challenged the French interests more than ever in the past.

Therefore, France makes effort to have a role in the equations of power of this region. Tough positions of the country on the missile program of Iran as well as concluding arms deal along with distancing from traditional human rights policies and supporting some Arab authoritarian and rich leaders can be analyzed in line with the policy of the great power game, the policy of balanced power which we witnessed once again during the imposed war and the supports of French government to the Iraqi dictator.

It seems that in a situation that the Hebrew-Arab axis is concerned about Iran nuclear deal and the U.S. return to JCPOA, French government is representing, behind the scene, the interests of Arab countries and also the Zionist regime in JCPOA talks which will be win-win for French government. In case an agreement is reached French companies will be the first ones to try their best to take the benefits of Iranian market and in case of non-reaching an agreement, in the absence of the U.S., the French government will be benefitted from Iran phobia and selling its weapons to Arab countries.

Critiques of French NGOs on Arms Sale to the UAE

Following the conclusion of French arms deal with UAE, we witness a wave of internal and external critiques including 5 French NGOs which assessed the French military attitude in contradiction with human rights attitude of the European Union, but since the recent French measures in the Middle East can be considered as to remove the long term concerns of the European Union, we witness that the European Union affiliated foundations remained tight-lipped in this respect.

It is long since the littoral countries of the Persian Gulf due to the inherent insecurity feeling of their undemocratic governments and using sophisticated arms as a means to preserve their identity and national pride, and having relied on petro-dollars, they are considered as to be the main impetus of the global weapons business. Great powers have always taken benefits from the leverage of arms sale to influence and to increase their political weight in the region. France is not an exception to this rule.

It is obvious that due to its strategy and global position as well as technological excellence of the U.S. made arms, the country was the major arms supplier of the region for years. But now because of the U.S. reluctance to sell its F-35 fighter jets to the UAE, and restrictions of arms sale to Saudi Arabia, particularly after the butchering of Jamal Khashoggi and the war crimes of the country, as well as the crimes committed by Arab Coalition in attacking Yemen, it seems that these countries are attempting to diversify the suppliers of their arms imports and creating the capacity to manufacture internally and thus to respond to their security concerns. The inclinations of these countries towards Russia and France could be analyzed in line with this.

The French policy on arms sales is the very same old policy of the UK and the U.S. colonialist powers. They try to propagate Iran phobia in the region and to show the peaceful nuclear activities of the Islamic Republic of Iran as perilous and thus to provide financial benefits to their arms corporations.

However, French authorities have always admitted that their arms are not used for offensive purposes, instead, their attitude is the sale of defensive arms. But according to French Military Intelligence Agency, as the third arms exporting country to the Persian Gulf, France has a major share in the war crimes of Arab Coalition led by Saudi Arabia in Yemen that has destroyed the economy of that country and has created the worst human crisis in the world, in which more than 10000 civilians lost their lives and has brought nearly 10 million to suffer from famine.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading