Dimensions, Objectives of Zionist Regime’s Threats against Iran

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An analyst of West Asia affairs, saying that the Zionist regime’s threats against Iran are more from a position of passivity and weakness since they know that they cannot take action in this regard, added: By taking advantage of such threats and influencing the atmosphere of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) talks, they now want to prevent an agreement with Iran and giving concessions to it.

Hossein Akbari, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, while referring to the repeated threats of the media and the Zionist regime to launch a military attack on Iran, noted: Recent Israeli actions and threats against Iran are from a reactionary position; because they see that Trump has been ousted from power and that the Biden administration, in the midst of negotiations, is in a situation where it has to reach an agreement with Iran, albeit a relative one.

He added: In fact, they see the passage of time in favor of Iran, and at the same time the measures they have taken so far, including political pressure and the pursuit of sanctions, although put a lot of pressure on the Iranian people, not only did not realize their targets, but had not brought them closer to their aims.

The analyst of West Asia affairs pointed to the new government’s outlook to the East in Iran and said: Iran does not see itself confined to relations with the West and the JCPOA, and in this context the Zionist regime feels that Iran is not willing to make any concessions to the Westerners to come to the negotiating table for agreement. Iran has not tied its economy to the JCPOA, and while being serious in the negotiations, it even pursues its political issues independently of the JCPOA.

Akbari continued: The Zionist regime and its supporters now have no other means against Iran, so they are in a reactionary and completely passive situation. Iran is on a path that can gain points both in the JCPOA and also solve its problem without the JCPOA; it also has a balanced view of the international arena on its agenda and is not limited to the West. On the other hand, unlike Trump, Biden has no motive to sacrifice everything to the Zionist regime, and most importantly, in the internal environment of that regime and its surrounding resistance, the military equation is in favor of resistance in the region and that regime does not have the upper hand.

Saying that the Zionist regime, within the framework of destabilizing the region and disturbing agreement, has always attempted to obstruct and sabotage, directly or indirectly, emphasized: There can be no doubt that if the United States, Europe and the Zionist regime were confident that they could achieve a result from military action and there was no obstacle on their way, certainly they would have carried out an operation against Iran.

The expert on West Asia affairs, saying that the Islamic Republic of Iran is always on a military alert, because it has always felt the threat closely and has prepared itself for it, noted: Iran is not a country that is not concerned about its surroundings or a country careless about its defensive and combat capabilities.

Silence of Intl. community before threats of the Zionist regime

Referring to the silence of the international community, governments and international and regional organizations, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency, regarding the overt and covert threats of the Zionist regime against Iran, Akbari stressed: The international community was not able to deal with this regime from the beginning; numerous resolutions against the Zionist regime, which have been ratified by all countries, have been rejected only by the US veto in the Security Council, and the UN has never been able to assert any right when it comes to the Zionist regime.

He described the influence and power of the Zionist lobby media in the international fora and the United Nations, adding: Unfortunately, now with the inefficiency of those organizations, they are no longer expected to react against the threats of the Zionist regime; they are not able to take even the slightest position in this regard.

The analyst of West Asia affairs stated that the Zionist regime and the United States are now in the worst situation compared to their past, stressing: Those who threaten Iran today have given up land on several battlefields, in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen have shamefully accepted defeat. Wherever they have encountered the Resistance to start a war and have used all the international tools and those of their allies, they have defeated.

Saying that Iran is familiar with the Zionist regime’s bragging, he said: They now want to take advantage of such threats and by influencing the atmosphere of the JCPOA talks, prevent reaching an agreement with Iran and giving concessions by the other side to us. They believe that if Iran gains a concession in the JCPOA and its economic situation improves, the power of Resistance, which has now turned into a regional front, will expand and dev rapidly; they are afraid of this.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading