Biden’s US Targets of New Intervention in the Region

2021/12/16 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on US affairs, commenting on the US President Joe Biden’s recent claims that one of the reasons for the US military presence outside the borders, including deployment of US troops in the Persian Gulf region such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Syria, is Iran’s regional activities, said: Although there are talks over a change in Washington’s approach in the Middle East region in line with implementation of Biden’s stated policies in that region, in general, it seems that the main foundations of the US foreign policy in the region have not changed much, rather the process of implementation of its policies has been subject to changes.

Zahra Sharifzadeh, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, said: In the foreign policy of each country, factors such as intellectual foundations, the nature of the international system, the characteristics and attitude of the governing body, the capabilities of the country, the objective needs of the society, geographical variables, political culture and diplomacy are involved.

Sharifzadeh said: The main lines of the US foreign policy include internationalism, coalition building and global consensus, defending values ​​and identifying threats and the enemies.

The researcher on the US affairs, analyzing Biden’s policies toward the region explained: Biden is trying to take full advantage of the so-called benefits of Trump’s policies while making changes in line with the new atmosphere.

Referring to Biden’s US targets in the region, Sharifzadeh said: The hypothesis is that the purpose and reason for the US presence in the region is, on the one hand, to incite the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf region against the Islamic Republic of Iran and, on the other hand, the US apparently seeks to resolve the Middle East issues by prioritizing diplomacy through coalition building in order to concentrate its main focus on China.

A member of the editorial board of the Iranian Journal of International Affairs, Sharifzadeh outlined importance of the Middle East region for the United States and stressed: The region, because of its geostrategic location at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, has an outstanding importance for the United States.

Asked why Biden chose Saudi Arabia for a military presence to protect his interests, while announcing his decision to stop arms sales to Saudi Arabia at the beginning of his presence in the White House, removed Ansarollah from the list of terrorist groups and downplayed bin Salman’s role in developments in the region, she said: It seems that the US strategy in the Middle East is to preserve its traditional allies, including Saudi Arabia, and to bring Saudi Arabia into line with its regional policies by raising human rights issues, especially in the Yemen crisis.

The expert believes that the other purpose of the US military presence in the Persian Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia, is to create dispute between Shiites and Sunnis and increase Iranophobia-, and the US President is trying to challenge Iran’s power and provoke Saudi Arabia to strengthen Arab nationalism.

A member of the editorial board of the Iranian Journal of International Affairs, referring to the point that Saudi Arabia is a rich country in terms of oil resources, said: In the American capitalist system, profit and capital are important, and so Biden, with his presence in a rich country like Saudi Arabia and selling weapons to it, tries to guarantee the economic interests of his country.

Sharifzadeh, stressing that Biden’s United States has placed the strategy of escalating tensions in the Middle East and interfering in the affairs of the region on its agenda, referred to some of the White House’s efforts in this regard. According to Sharifzadeh, US strategies for escalating tensions in the Middle East include: selling arms to the countries in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, with an emphasis on Iranophobia; using natural resources of the Middle Eastern countries; maintaining the region as a consumer market; supporting allies and maintaining relations with regional allies; consolidating the US power in the region; preventing formation of regional hegemony; protecting oil resources; increasing conflict and proxy war in the region; planning to divide countries in the region by creating terrorist groups and destabilizing the region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading