Blurred Perspective of Russia-West Relations

2021/11/20 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: After the collapse of the Soviet Union, many in the West thought that the Russians were interested in joining the Western world and would become more like Europeans and Americans, but it soon became clear that centuries of Russian history has given shape to a distinct and unique understanding of the position of that country in the world. Moscow now considers its security zone not the borders of the Russian Federation, but the borders of the Soviet Union, and demands that the United States and Europe accept it. Alireza Thamoudi -Expert on Europe Affairs

In the past two decades, much of the debate in the United States and Europe has been focused on how to deal with Russia and the so-called resumption of relations with that country. The policy of resuming relations in the Obama administration, the EU-Russia modernization partnership, the German Mosberg initiative, or the EU’s proposals for selective engagement with Russia have been among the initiatives to start talks with Russia in recent years.

Challenges between the West and Russia

During Putin’s presidency, Russia has become a centralized state and has returned to its traditional global position. It has also competed with the United States to strengthen its influence in various fields. Despite its economic weakness, Moscow has been able to intervene in various parts of the world and challenge Western interests. Russia’s relations with the West have been peaceful only at two junctures in recent years: first, the events of 9/11 and Russian aid to the United States in the war in Afghanistan; and the second juncture was between 2008-2012 during Medvedev’s presidency and the policy of resumption of relations during the Obama administration, when the West and Russia cooperated in areas such as arms control, Afghanistan and Iran; but with Putin returning to the Kremlin in 2012, tensions between the West and Russia resumed once again. Russia initially accused the West of being the main culprit in the 2012 anti-Putin protests. Granting asylum to Edward Snowden was another important factor in escalating tensions. Meanwhile, the escape of Ukrainian President Yanukovych and the subsequent entry of Russian troops into the Crimean peninsula (a violation of the 1994 Budapest Accord) caused tensions in the relations between the two sides. Since spring of 2014, Russia and Ukraine have been embroiled in a war in Donbas in which more than 14,000 people have lost their lives. Moscow’s involvement in the Syrian crisis has also raised tensions between Russia and the West. Another example of such tensions was the accusation of Russian cyber-interference in the 2016 US presidential election, in which Russia used social media to intensify the polarized US political climate. Russia’s actions against some of its citizens on the European soil or the imprisonment of Alexei Navalny also indicate a significant difference between Russia’s and the West’s perception of human rights issues.

West and Russia trying to undermine each other

In the years of the first decade of the third millennium, Russia sought to restore its position on the world stage by increasing energy prices, economic growth and modernization, and by building powerful state-owned companies worldwide in the field of selling strategic resource, and was using political influence in this regard. However, since the beginning of the second decade of this millennium, there has been a fundamental shift in Moscow’s policies. Given the disappeared hopes for economic modernization and the weakening of Russia’s economy, the path to power through economic growth was eroded, and in fact the path to power recovery through the enhancement of domestic capabilities was replaced by the weakening of geopolitical rivals. Arrests of political opponents, financial support for European populist parties, hybrid warfare and misinformation, and in some cases support for specific political forces, have been among Russia’s policies.

In contrast, Western countries did not seek to weaken Russia in the 1990s and the first decade of the third millennium. Although it was in the interests of Europe and the United States that the Russian Federation not to remain as powerful as in Soviet times, they never wanted a big country like Russia to go bankrupt with nuclear weapons, thus upsetting all geopolitical balances. Although the European Union and Russia even launched the “Partnership for Modernization” program due to the Obama administration’s policy of resuming relations, the Ukraine-Crimea crisis was the end of the resumption strategy. Following such developments, the imposition of economic sanctions aimed at isolating Russia became part of the Western agenda. Western experts warn that mutual weakening strategies between the West and Russia have weakened both sides, and that the rise of populists in the United States and the European Union has undermined the West’s credibility, cohesion and capabilities. On the other hand, Russia’s resources and its economic future have also fallen victim to Moscow’s military and political targets.

Concluding remarks

In recent years, the war in Georgia in 2008, the annexation of Crimea and the start of the Ukraine war in 2014 have shaken Russia’s position as a strategic partner and made Moscow a very important strategic challenge for the West. Russia has now been able to maintain its global credibility due to its traditional advantages of nuclear weapons, geographical size, military might, and permanent membership in the Security Council (despite economic difficulties). Of course, there are also differences among European countries over the type of interaction with Russia. While the historical experiences of the Baltic States and former countries of the Warsaw Pact have raised serious concerns for EU about Russia, larger countries such as France and Germany are seeking economic engagement with Russia.

It can be said that after years of declining relations, the sanctions, diplomatic reprisal and escalation of information war has put relations between the two sides at their lowest level since the end of the Cold War. There is a growing feeling among Russian leaders that the fragile relations between the West and the East have reached an irreversible point, and that Moscow must abandon the hope for reconciliation with the West and look for lasting alternatives; including intensive strengthening of relations with China and establishment of purposeful relations with some European countries and other regions that are interested in doing business with Moscow. It seems that this competition will end only when one side of the story comes to the conclusion that it is losing this endless competition.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading