Turkey’s concern and opposition to Greece-France arms cooperation

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Relations between Turkey and Greece as two NATO members have experienced intense tensions in recent years, with both sides accusing each other of inciting the other. Relations deteriorated sharply last year, with warships in the eastern Mediterranean clashing over maritime borders and energy rights. Athens and Ankara came close to a military confrontation last year in a dispute over gas exploration in the eastern Mediterranean. Turkey called on Greece to adopt peaceful political solutions, not aggressive ones. Mahmoud Fazeli—International issues analyst

Greece was very active in diplomacy and developing relations with other countries, despite economic difficulties. In the last year, it has increased its defense and security cooperation with the United States, France, and the Zionist regime, with the full support of the European Union. Athens has expanded its relations with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE, Jordan, Egypt and Libya, while exhibiting power in the Mediterranean. The purchase of Greek weapons from France and the United States, the signing of a military agreement with Israel, and the holding of numerous military exercises with Arab countries in the Mediterranean are among the actions taken by Greece that have raised concerns and protests in Turkey.

Greece also recently signed a defense agreement with France, which was strongly opposed by Turkey. The strategic agreement on military and defense cooperation between Greece and France includes the ordering of three vessels. The purchase of these ships should be completed by the end of this year, worth   3.5 billion dollars, and delivered by 2025. In September, the Greek Air Force officially announced that it wanted to purchase six more Rafael fighter jets from France and increase its total order to about 30 fighter jets. The decision was immediately approved by parliament.

Athens is also in talks to buy four new frigates. Greece has allocated 11.5 billion euros (14 billion dollars) to modernize its armed forces over the next five years. Delivery of 18 Rafael aircrafts is scheduled to be completed within two years. Jets and the purchase of air-to-air missiles are estimated to cost 2.3 billion euros. Paris also plans to equip the Greek navy with warships.

The Greek-French Strategic Partnership Agreement provides for mutual military assistance in the event of an armed attack by a third country, even a NATO member, on one of the two countries. Athens in general claims that with the defense agreement signed with Paris, France will be responsible for defending Greece in the event of a possible Turkish attack. According to the Greek Prime Minister, the French intervention in the presence of the Orux Reis drilling ship in southern Crete, according to the agreement with France, stipulates that France is obliged to assist Greece in the event of a Turkish attack. Greece has been pursuing such agreements with European countries for the past 40 years so that Europe can intervene where NATO and the United Nations are reluctant to intervene. Greece has reached agreements with France, the United States, Egypt and Italy on the delimitation of maritime zones over the past two years.

Regarding Greece’s defense agreements with France and the United States, the Greek Prime Minister believes that Greece will strengthen its defense and sign agreements within the framework of international law. Greece, Cyprus and Egypt have demonstrated their adherence to international law and have signed a maritime delimitation agreement with Egypt. The Greek Foreign Minister criticized Turkey’s reaction to the Greek agreement with France and the United States, claiming that “Greece’s agreements with France and the United States are also beneficial for NATO and for the stability and security of the region.  Turkey’s reactions can only be justified if it considers itself an aggressor country. These reactions are completely incomprehensible. Greek agreements and memoranda of understanding are not against any country, including Turkey. This defense agreement strengthens Europe’s defense and security, strengthens transatlantic ties and a more equitable distribution of responsibilities. “

The Turkish president and defense minister have repeatedly spoken out against Greek-French defense cooperation over the past month. Even during his recent meeting with Joe Biden and Macron on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Rome, Erdogan expressed his country’s concern about setting up a base in Greece’s Alexandroupolis (40 km from Turkey) to control the Balkans, which Macron apparently did not answer and only emphasized Greece’s request to buy the fighter from France.

The Turkish defense minister claimed in July that Greece had entered into an arms race, that they were buying weapons and equipment, but that it was not possible to change the balance of power with a few second-hand jets. According to Ankara, any country can sign an agreement with any other country. We do not claim that all these agreements are against us. The important thing is to be able to defend our continental shelf. We have shown and will continue to show our ability both on the ground and at the diplomatic table against those who try to trample on our rights.

As tensions between Turkey and Greece continue in the eastern Mediterranean, Greece, along with the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Israel, Egypt and Greek Cyprus, held a joint exercise called Nemesis with fighter jets and warships. According to Turkey, the formation of new alliances within NATO, the purchase of military weapons and the support of NATO member states will damage the “spirit of NATO solidarity” and bilateral relations. Provocative actions and rhetoric that increase tensions will not work and should be avoided. The NATO Alliance of which we (Turkey) are a member is the strongest defense organization today and in history; So everyone should know that pursuing other coalitions as long as they are inside the organization will damage NATO and bilateral relations and undermine trust.

Although France has condemned unilateral action in the eastern Mediterranean and sent frigates to the region, it continues to believe that NATO is not being open enough with Ankara. Within NATO, all these issues must be clarified with Turkey, and everything must be done so that Turkey does not turn its back on Europe and turn to religious extremism or negative geopolitical options.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading