Message, Outcome of Recent Erdogan-Putin Summit

2021/10/13 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russian President Vladimir Putin met on September 29 in the Black Sea resort city of Sochi, Russia. Of course, the short duration of the meeting compared to the long meetings in the past has attracted the attention of analysts who have assessed the event as being related to the escalation of differences between the two sides on some issues. Erdogan and Putin have met 26 times in person since the war in November 2015, when a Russian fighter plane was shot down by Turkey. The last meeting of the leaders of the two countries was held on March 5, 2020 in Moscow. Mahmoud Fazeli - International affairs analyst

The recent meeting came a week after criticizing the state of Turkish relations with the administration of US President Joe Biden, to the effect that: “There is no good process in relations between Turkey and the United States”. During the meeting, in addition to bilateral relations, issues such as Syria, Libya, Karabakh, trade relations, the purchase of the second package of S-400 missile defense systems, natural gas and regional developments were discussed. During the bilateral meeting, the two sides outlined their red lines on vital issues, including the Kurdish regions to Crimea, from Afghanistan to Libya and from the Caucasus to Syria.

The main topic of the meeting was the recent escalation of tensions in the Syrian city of Idlib. Concerns escalated in the region after Moscow recently attacked opposition positions around Idlib, with the possibility of cancellation of a ceasefire under Russia-Turkey agreement reached on March 5, 2020 in Idlib. Erdogan and Putin agreed to maintain the status quo in the Idlib region, an issue that has strained Moscow’s relations with Ankara in recent years. However, the Syrian president is trying to end the civil war that has been going on since 2011 by occupying Idlib as the last major resistance point in the hands of the opposition. Failure to observe a ceasefire in the region and the readiness of Russia and Syrian forces to conduct operations are seen as factors in escalating tensions in the region.

After Erdogan’s recent meeting with Putin in Sochi, attention was focused on Idlib. Turkey claims that no changes have been made to Turkish observation posts in Idlib following the recent visit to Sochi, and that talks with Russia to resume joint patrols are going on. The two sides have agreed to abide by the March 5 agreement. Moscow’s approach to Idlib is very clear. According to Moscow, radical jihadists are using Turkish military bases in and around Idlib as a shield against the Syrian army. Of course, Russia will sooner or later give the green light to the Syrian army to retake Idlib. In his latest position, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov believes that threats continue in Idlib. Some terrorist groups are intensifying their activities in the region and are even attacking Russian forces. Those terrorist groups must be expelled from the region as soon as possible.

Ankara and Moscow have been holding intensive talks on Idlib since 2017. The main purpose of the talks was to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe in Idlib and to eliminate terrorist groups in the region. The Sochi agreement signed between Turkey and Russia in October 2019 provided for the withdrawal of elements of the YPG terrorist group up to 30 km south of the Euphrates. In this regard, Erdogan stressed to his Russian counterpart the need to implement the Sochi agreement as soon as possible.

The issue of S-400 missile defense systems was a major issue at the recent Sochi summit. During the meeting, Erdogan referred to the issue of continuing Turkish-Russian cooperation in the field of S-400 missile defense systems. It is said that in the United States, the need to cancel the purchase of S-400 missile defense systems was stressed to the Turkish President Erdogan. In Sochi, Erdogan not only sent a strong message to Biden, who has closed the doors on him, but also extended a hand for cooperation to Russia, citing the possibility of buying a second package of S-400 missile defense systems from Russia. Turkey’s agreement to buy a second package of S-400 missile defense systems from Russia is Putin’s main achievement since the Sochi summit. November 5 will be a critical date for S-400 systems, and the crisis will intensify as Turkey launches a roadmap to buy a second package of S-400 missile defense systems from Russia.

In recent years, one of the West’s concerns has been Turkey’s purchase of S-400 systems from Russia. Under an agreement signed in late 2017, Turkey bought two S-400 missile defense systems worth 2.5 billion dollars from Russia. For this reason, Turkey was targeted by the CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) and was excluded from the F-35 fighter planes acquisition project. Erdogan rejects criticism that Turkey has weakened NATO as the West’s most important military alliance by buying advanced defense systems from Russia and responds: We are a member of NATO on one hand and we have relations with Russia on the other hand. Why should we choose one?

Erdogan added: We are buying the weapons we need. If the Americans had sold the Patriot missile defense system to Turkey, we would not have to buy the S-400 systems. We can strengthen our defense as we wish. According to the head of the Russian arms exporter company, Ankara and Moscow will soon sign a new agreement on S-400 missile defense systems. There are also rumors about the possibility of buying the SU-35 and SU-57 fighter planes by Turkey from Russia.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading