Prospects of Beijing-Moscow relations and mutual expectations of the two sides

2021/09/25 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are a lot of speculations about the future of relations between China and Russia. Some describe it as a “pseudo-unity” and some as a “marriage of convenience”. Mohammad Javad Qahremani- PhD in international relations

In the area of economy, annual trade between China and Russia exceeded from about 58 billion dollars in 2010 to 107 billion in 2020, approximately doubling in a decade. In addition, in 2019, Russia turned into the 13th destination of China’s investors by attracting 12.8 billion dollars of Chinese investment.

 

In military dimension, a glance at the figures of arms trade and holding joint military drills suggest there is close military cooperation between the two countries. According to the figures of the Stockholm Peace Institute, between 2016 and 2020, 77 percent of China’s arms import were from Russia.

 

In diplomacy, leaders of the two countries have met more than 30 times since 2013; in the meantime, the “neighborliness agreement” has been extended between the two countries and was signed in July this year by Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping.

 

But indeed, can these figures indicate the real nature of relations between Beijing and Russia and or demonstrate the probable status of relations in the future? Responding to these questions requires the investigation of factors linking the two countries in the international system.

 

In the international relations literature, what is connecting countries together is common interests. However, on the other hand, the governments expect that the independent interests of each other in various fields are not challenged until a real, deep and lasting cooperation is formed. This is true on various issues between Russia and China. Beijing, for example, expects Russia not to side with opposing countries in territorial disputes in the South China Sea. In this regard, Russia has so far taken a position of neutrality and silence in this regard. The non-recognition of the US “Indo-Pacific” strategy is also one of the expectations of the Chinese side from Moscow. During Sergei Lavrov’s visit to India in April 2021, he called the strategy a “divisive geopolitical framework.”

 

On the other hand, not challenging Russia’s influence in its immediate foreign sphere, not cooperating with the West on sanctions, or, more recently, Russia’s approach to Belarus, are examples of Moscow’s expectations from China. In practice, there is no evidence that China is seriously challenging Russia’s influence abroad. Even in the case of Belarus, the Chinese newspaper “The Global Times” stressed in an article that maintaining close relations with Russia is an inevitable option for the country with the aim of economic development and ensuring its national interests and security.

 

It is noteworthy, however, that in some cases the expectations of the parties may conflict with their independent national interests. For example, the strategy of diversifying partners in Asia makes Moscow attach great importance to relations with India, which is China’s rival. This is inconsistent with Beijing’s expectation of keeping relations with New Delhi limited.

 

Therefore, this view leads us to the fact that the current figures do not show well the future outlook for Russian-Chinese relations. Considering that the sometimes challenging expectations of China and Russia in the relations between the two countries seem to be very important, and in view of the new dynamics in the Asia-Pacific region and the international system in which cooperation more than anything else requires strong common interests, there is a limited prospect for the formation of an inseparable strategic link in Russia-China relations.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading