Comparative Study of Taliban’s Dominant Model for Governance

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A professor at the University of Religions and Denominations said that the “Islamic Emirate” of the Taliban means non-interference of the people and other groups and parties in politics and social affairs, adding: It seems that in the future, apart from pressuring the Afghan people to implement what they call Islamic law, we will be witness to almost no significant difference between the Taliban government and the governance models in some Sunni religion countries.

Hojatoleslam Dr. Mahdi Farmanian, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, stated: The closest model of government to the model of the “Islamic Emirate” of the Taliban will be the government of Saudi Arabia during the reign of “Abdul Aziz” between 1900 up to 1953.

Saudi Arabia’s past governance, a model for Taliban rule

Saying that sons of Abdul Aziz chose more secularist approaches in administering  the government and cope with some issues with tolerance, he added: It seems that in the model of the “Islamic Emirate”, we will be witness to the presence of a head of government without holding elections and paying attention to the principles of democracy. The people must pledge allegiance to the head, and the opposition will be treated with violence. Of course, the Taliban seek to enforce Sharia in Afghanistan; while Sharia is not enforced in many cases in Saudi Arabia due to the approach of the rulers.

Stating that the Islamic Emirate means that people and other groups and parties do not interfere in politics and social affairs, the university professor continued: The Taliban, along with the head of government, will have a leadership council called the “Council of settelment”, which will be formed to consult with the head on any issues he deem necessary, and members of the council will be elected by the same head.

While explaining the differences between Saudi Wahhabism with the Taliban, Farmanian stated: The origin of the Taliban’s thoughts goes back to the Sunni currents of the subcontinent, and in particular to the Deobandi school of thought; because most of the Taliban and its leaders are educated in Deobandi schools. Meanwhile, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam played a key role in supporting Afghanistan’s Sunni jihadist forces and the Taliban mobilization, to the extent that even the draft of the Taliban constitution has been prepared by that group. Of course, due to the diverse range of opinions in Deobandi schools and consequently the Taliban, their school of thought is the school of “contradictory dualities”.

The difference between the Caliphate and the Emirate

Explaining that the model of the “Islamic Emirate” is not seriously different from the “Islamic Caliphate” in terms of governmental characteristics, Farmanian said: In the view of the Sunnis, the “Caliphate” has characteristics; the Ottoman Empire would not introduce its government as a “caliphate” either, because in this view, one of the prevailing conditions is that it must be “Qurayshi”; but after that empire became powerful, there were justifications that, for example, if the ruler is not a Qurayshi, the position of the caliphate can be considered for him. It seems that the Taliban will take the same approach in the future.

Referring to the demarcations between countries and the efforts for nation-building in accordance with those demarcations, he continued: Mohammad Rashid Reza, the religious thinker and political activist in Egypt and Syria in the late Ottoman period, stated for the first time in his book that ‘we cannot establish an Islamic Caliphate because of the situation we are witnessing in the Islamic world; instead, we must seek to establish an “Islamic state” within a specific geographical area’.

The researcher of Islamic currents, sects and religions said: The Muslim Brotherhood also sought to establish an Islamic government in a specific geographical area, but they eventually accepted the elections and tried to dominate over the government through it; but the Taliban do not believe in such a way, and if they come to power, in the coming years they will move towards the appointment of a Qurayshi as leader and will talk about the Islamic Caliphate.

He reminded: Of course, the Taliban did not have a positive view of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt; to the extent that during the Taliban rule, their books were banned from entering into Afghanistan. Such an approach stems from the past fatwas of the scholars of India, Sindh and Pakistan, and of course the positions of the Brotherhood populations against such view have further intensified those differences.

Saying that we will not see a significant difference between the Taliban government and the Arab governance models in some Sunni countries, Farmanian said: The only difference we may see will be stricter attitude towards the people with regard to what they call implementation of the Sharia; especially since such approach towards women is quite noticeable.

Foreign policy in the Islamic Emirate

The associate professor of the University of Religions and Denominations said that in this period of Taliban rule, we will be witness to coordination between the United States and the Taliban, adding: In the new era, the Taliban will drastically change their approach to the international community and connect with all countries in the region and the world; as in the past, they will not show anti-American attitudes and probably will only not recognize Israel; but there will be no official or serious threat or opposition to it. On the other hand, as we see in Turkey at the time of Mr. Erdogan, sometimes they will only take a stand on some of the atrocities committed against Muslims and will change their style and method under the influence of time.

At the same time, he stressed: Due to various historical issues and different ideological bases between the Taliban and Wahhabism, there will be no serious alliance between Saudi Arabia and the Taliban. The Taliban will interact with Saudi Arabia and have relations with it like any other country, and while they will not speak out against it, they will not form a serious alliance against other countries.

Farmanian said: Afghanistan’s geographical location is as such that it does not have access to the sea, and for this reason it is necessary to meet its needs from the Pakistan or Iran. The Taliban will certainly pay attention to such issues in the new era, given its experience.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading