Last Ditch Effort of Zionist Regime against JCPOA Revival

2021/07/12 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Once again and coincided with the Vienna talks in which parties are approaching an agreement on Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action widely known as JCPOA revival, authorities of the Zionist regime have started to raise impediments on its way and make JCPOA revival difficult or impossible. Hassan Haani-Zadeh, Middle-East Analyst

In line with this, the recent visit of Reuven Rivlin, former president of the Zionist regime to the United States and his meeting with President Joe Biden is assessed as futile effort of the authorities of the regime in order to broaden the US supportive umbrella to Israel and raising impediments on the way to revive JCPOA. As we noticed, in the last round of nuclear talks during Barak Obama, the Zionist along with Saudi Arabia authorities spared no effort to make to talks fruitless. Although they, ultimately, did not reach their goal and JCPOA was agreed upon.

Now, it happens again while the former president of the Zionist regime made his trip to Washington only a few days before his tenure of office was finished. But he received a cold shoulder from Joe Biden, the President of the United States. However, it was not the only effort made by the authorities of the Zionist regime. Naftali Benet, the new prime minister of the Zionist regime is also going to pay a visit to the While House and have a meeting with President Joe Biden and coordinate the general policies of the Zionist regime on the region and Iran with him. Although Biden renewed the US commitment to preserve the sustain security of the Zionist regime, but the resultant of reports show that the While House leaders are not satisfied about the policies adopted by the authorities of the Zionist regime in broadening internal crisis of the occupied territories.

Since Joe Biden’s victory on 2020 US presidential election, the least contacts between the authorities of the Zionist regime and the While House leaders were made within the past seven decades; because Biden’s team is strongly unhappy about the adventurism of Likud party in the region. The most pivotal differences between the White House and the authorities of the Zionist regime are the continuation of settlement construction in the occupied territories as well as the Zionist Israeli army attacks and extremist settlers to Sheikh Jarrah region in Eastern Quds. Another issue which was raised in the course of the meeting between the two presidents was the expansion of Iranian influence in the region and approaching views among Iran and 4+1 in Vienna. In the course of the meeting, the former president of the Zionist regime tried once again to encourage Biden to impose sanctions against Iran and to dissuade him to return back to JCPOA. It appears that his effort led to nowhere. Joe Biden’s team considers Trump withdrawal from JCPOA as an unjustifiable act. That’s why they plan for the US return to JCPOA. Although the democrat administration tries to include both other issues to JCPOA talks and make some changes in the timetable therein.

Another pivotal issue in the agenda of talks between the former president of the Zionist regime and the president of the United States was the expansion of Iranian influence among the countries of the axis of resistance, which has led to empowerment of anti-Zionist movements in the region. In the 12-day Gaza war that ultimately led to the victory of Palestinian combatants, the majority of Israeli army commanders believed that Hamas and Islamic Jihad were under the influence of field experiences of martyr Ghassem Soleimani and other field commanders of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

After the Gaza war that led to the defeat of the Zionist regime army, the configuration of the regime was undergone major changes and Benjamin Netanyahu was driven out of the power circle. The Changes created in the power circle and the exit of Likud party from the scene was probably done by a hint from Biden’s team. Unlike the former president Trump, the democrat president of the US has no positive impression towards Israeli extremist parties. Former president Trump was very close to extremist parties of the Zionist regime, in a way that he had to withdraw from JCPOA under the Zionist lobby.

The Regime has faced strong political isolation domestically ever-since extremist parties defeated, because the accumulation of domestic problems as well as military defeat in Gaza had created strong critical conditions for the new cabinet of the Zionist regime. Now, it seems that the new cabinet of the Zionist regime headed by Naftali Bennet has adopted more conservative attitude in comparison with that of the former cabinet of Benjamin Netanyahu. Naftali Bennet tries to iron out the wrinkles between Tel Aviv and Washington and does not act in a way that fans the White House anger. That’s why Knesset the parliament of the Zionist regime elected recently Isaac Herzog with 78 votes out of 120 seats as the eleventh president of Israeli regime. Changes are coupled with an important message.

The message is clear; Israeli governance body has changed according to the new policies of the White House and President Biden himself. The new cabinet will not take any political and field measures without coordination with Joe Biden’s team. Obviously, the changes mean as a kind of coordination between Tel Aviv and Washington, because Joe Biden’s team is not willing to pay high political and international prices for the adventurism of the Zionist regime.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading