New wave of confrontation between Moscow and West in the East of Ukraine and the Black Sea

Strategic Council Online—Editorial: In recent weeks and parallel with an increase in military movements along the Black Sea and Russia-Ukraine border, this region has been once again brought into the global focus. Seyyed Nader Noorbakhsh-European affairs analyst

Present circumstances are generally rooted in a crisis which erupted since 2014 in the relations between Russia and Ukraine. After that, Russia annexed Crimea to its soil in a referendum—something reciprocated by Western countries with measures such as sanctions on Russia and evicting it from the G8 group of countries.

Remarkable to mention that Ukraine is home to a remarkable population with Russian descent who are mostly residing in the east of the country and are seeking autonomy from Kiev. This is while in recent years, and concurrent with the escalation of tension, the Russian-sympathizer separatist militias in Donbas, east of Ukraine, have resorted to direct military confrontation against the central government in Kiev. At the present time, two self-ruled republics in this region namely Donetsk and Luhansk are out of the control of the federal government. Moreover, during the conflicts of the past seven years, more than 13,000 people have been killed. Russia has denied any interference in the conflicts. Yet it accuses Ukraine of trying to commit genocide of Russian Ukrainians in this region in case it continues with its advancement.  Many of the Russian Ukrainians have received Russian passports since 2019. Ukraine has recently moved a huge number of its military forces to these regions and Russia has reciprocated by sending its military forces and vehicles to its border with Ukraine.  This may change current policy of Russia to support separatists in their direct military confrontation with Ukraine. Ukraine considers confrontations in this region not a domestic conflict but a war between Russia and Ukraine. Kiev has renewed its request to become a NATO member and join the military alliance to seek its support. In the meantime, Ukraine has threatened to move towards the production of nuclear weapons should it not receive sufficient support and action by NATO. Furthermore, Turkey, another important country in the strategic region of the Black Sea, has recently sold military equipment including drones to Ukraine. On one hand, Belarus that is now more inclined towards Russia after last year’s disturbances in the country has stationed military forces to its border with Ukraine and has participated in many wargames with Russia in the region. On the other, the issue of Ukraine has turned into the scene of the presence of foreign forces. During the past several days, various reports have indicated that NATO is deciding to send its marine forces to the Black Sea. According to the Russian minister of defense, NATO has stationed more than 40,000 military troops in Russia’s proximity—a measure which has been harshly criticized by Moscow. Even Kremlin has threatened to stop the movement of warships of foreign third parties to the Black Sea for at least six months. Moreover, Russia has moved some of its warships from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea.

Foreign fighters from other countries have been also involved in both fronts; recently, reports were released indicating that Serbian volunteers from the Balkans have been moved to this region to fight for Russia. In the opposite front, groups from Chechnya, Georgia and some Belarusians opposed to Lukashenko are supporting Ukraine. Moreover, neo-Nazi rightist extremist groups such as the Azov Movement are fighting against Russians. In fact, as against many populist rightist extremist groups that have good relations with Russia, neo-Nazi groups have been able to establish a network in the Scandinavian countries, France, Germany and Austria in support of Ukraine. On such a basis, the involvement of neo-Nazi groups have provided Russia with the chance to introduce, in its media propaganda, its movements as a Russian fight against fascism as in the Second World War.

A glance at the performance of Russia in issues related to Georgia, Crimea, Syria and Belarus suggest that Moscow benefits from its geopolitical advantages properly and is highly unlikely to back down on its positions. After the annexation of Crimea, Ukraine lost some of marine territory in the east of the country. Russia has a upper hand now in the Azov Sea. At the present time, Russia, relying on various leverages, tries to maintain its position. For example, a strategic position for Russia is the Kaliningrad region located in the north of Poland. Russia has turned this region into a base for the stationing of missile platforms capable of targeting many spots in Europe. Moreover, Russia can use tools and leverages against the West and NATO such as energy, cyber-attacks, public opinion manipulation through cyberspace and media and support for Eurosceptic population opposition and anti-NATO groups. Of course, with Joe Biden in the White House, the US would heighten its anti-Russian policies and may impose more sanctions under the excuse of the detention of Navalny and protests in Russia as leverages of pressure for the West.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading