Prospects of the peace process in Afghanistan and the Istanbul talks

2021/04/15 | interview, political, top news

Online Strategic Council—Interview: An analyst of Afghanistan issues says the Istanbul meeting is in fact complementary to the Moscow conference and it seems there is an agreement between the Americans and the Russians behind the curtains on the future of Afghanistan and the structure of power, adding that such efforts are far from success without soliciting the prior agreement of the neighbors and the incorporation of their viewpoints.

Pirmohammad Mollazehi told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that there appears to be a determination among big powers such as Russia, China, the United States and Europe with the objective of finding a political solution for the termination of the war in Afghanistan.

“The domestic situation in Afghanistan requires the formation of such a process. Moreover, the countries of the region and Afghanistan’s neighbors have also reached the conclusion that more serious efforts are needed in this path,” he said, referring to numerous rounds of negotiations held for the establishment of peace in Afghanistan.

Mollazehi said Russians and Americans have proposed two initiatives to establish peace in Afghanistan, adding that “under such circumstances, there is going to be a meeting within the next few days in Istanbul with the participation of all parties. This meeting is in fact complementary to the Moscow meeting and it appears that there is some sort of agreement behind the scene between the Americans and Russians over the future of Afghanistan and the structure of power—a structure of power which is going to be different from the arrangements formed by the United Nations and the first Bonn Conference which led to the establishment of the present structure of governance.”

New structures of power in Afghanistan

This expert of Afghanistan issues said “it seems that there is going to be a merger among opposition forces, the Taliban and the incumbent government as well as forces who claim power in Afghanistan in the new structure of power so that power is shared and Afghanistan’s Constitution is reformed or amended to be adaptable to the new conditions.”

According to Mollazehi, the form of government may change from the present status which has centralized power in Kabul and in the hands of the president. A parliamentary system shall be established with the prime minister to hold the executive power. Also, there is some sort of the distribution of power in the form of federalism which incorporates at least four main ethnicities of Afghanistan in areas that are legally under their control. A share of local government will be set aside for the federal government.

He said that the implementation of such a structure of power and program and the establishment of peace and stability through this structure will not be simple, adding that in addition to the Taliban who are claiming power, there are about 23 other groups that have had no place in these negotiations. They can easily hoist the flag of Daesh and continue their conflict under the name of the Daesh khalifate.

Mollazehi added that “it seems that there has been agreements on several issues. For example, they want Afghanistan to be non-partisan. In fact, a form of government which existed during Zaher Shah based on which no eastern and western powers shall interfere. This system of course was disrupted after a coup by Davood Khan. The conditions created after the victory of jihad and defeat of Russians which led to the emergence of the Mojahedin will not repeat under which Americans and Russians withdrew but countries of the region entered competition.”

Efforts to the impartiality of Afghanistan

This expert of Afghanistan affairs said an agreement should be hence concluded which is recognized by big powers and regional powers and neighbors as being impartial.

“If this happens, Afghanistan will be placed in a new status so that it could maintain its impartiality and if Afghanistan is to receive assistance from abroad, it should be unconditional and without foreign intervention.”

Referring to issues to be discussed in the Istanbul meeting, he said it seems that Afghanistan would move towards peace and stability and political solution if the dimensions of the new situation are well discussed and clarified in the Istanbul meeting. Otherwise, civil war may be intensified in Afghanistan after the Istanbul meeting.

On the criticisms leveled by the government of Ashraf Ghani concerning the probability of exerting power in changes in the structure of power and government, he said there are two branches of approaches in the government.

“In a branch which is known as the national unity government, there are Jihadis and the Northis represented by Mr. Abdollah Abdollah and the other branch is the Liberal Democrats who are represented by Mr. Ghani. The combination of these two currents would form the present government. It seems that the Northis and the Abdollah Abdollah section are prepared to reconcile with the Taliban.”

The probability of omission of Ashraf Ghani and his close allies from power

Mollazehi said Ashraf Ghani and his close allies will be sacrificed and probably omitted. However, the Liberal Democrat current will not be omitted. They are the third current that would remain next to the Jihadis, Abdollah and the Taliban. Therefore, the combination of these three currents would be probably taking the power in Afghanistan of course without the presence of Ashraf Ghani who may step aside.

This expert of Afghanistan issues said Ashraf Ghani is very political and would not step aside easily, adding that “Ghani will play his role as he brings a plan to Istanbul based on which early elections should be held within the next six months and the winner will hold the power and the process will be recognized and continue through democratic mechanisms described in the present Constitution of Afghanistan.

He said Ghani has presented this plan in order to maintain his grip on power.

“Within the framework of the present Constitution of Afghanistan, the Taliban would not easily accept this plan; therefore, each one of these players, either domestically or regionally and internationally, would be pursuing their own agenda in Istanbul however it seems that Mr. Abdollah Abdollah and the Taliban will not back down and Ashraf Ghani would therefore have no choice but the withdraw his plan.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading