Afghanistan and its future

2021/03/20 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert of sub-continental issues says the Moscow peace meeting on Afghanistan is going to be held on 18 March 2021 in Russia but is facing a lot of challenges.

Pirmohammad Mollazehi told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that the most important problem of any peace plan for Afghanistan is that the Taliban is seeking to establish an Islamic state while the people and government of Afghanistan as well as political and religious parties want to keep the Islamic Republic establishment.

“At the present time, there are two main plans: one is the Moscow plan and the other is the American plan. There are similarities between the two plans in some issues and it seems that there is preliminary coordination between Moscow and Washington in this connection.”

He added that both plans consider important roles for regional and global players, saying that “the United Nations has defined important roles for the neighboring and influential countries as well as big regional and international powers.”

Mollazehi said the interim government is going to consider ceasefire and reform the current constitution or draft a new one to accommodate the approaches of both parties on establishing an Islamic state and an Islamic republic.

He added that in this plan, the government posts will be divided equally between the Taliban and domestic currents (Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani) and the Taliban will be shared in the power in the first stage.

Referring to the main three currents influencing developments in Afghanistan, he said “the domestic current is divided into three groups: the Taliban plus Hekmatyar who include Islamist parties; second are the Jihadi groups represented by Abdullah Abdullah and third are the Liberals led by Ashraf Ghani.”

Mollazehi said the second influential current is the regional countries that have common borders with Afghanistan and those countries that exert influence in that country but do not have common borders with Afghanistan.

“The first group is three Central Asian states including Tajikistan, Uzbakistan and Turkmenistan plus Iran and Pakistan. The second group includes countries such as India, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Turkey with no borders with Afghanistan.”

The third group, he said, are the countries that compete over influence in Afghanistan. They include big powers such as Russia, the United States, the European Union and China.

Mollazehi added that Moscow and Washington believe that there should be coordination among these three currents so that peace could be established in Afghanistan and they guarantee the peace for Afghanistan, region and the whole world.

The expert of sub-continental issues said such a plan to establish peace in Afghanistan is facing problems, adding that “the main problem with the plan is the main competition between an Islamic state and an Islamic republic. In fact, the Taliban is seeking to establish an Islamic state while the people and government of Afghanistan as well as political and religious parties want to keep the Islamic Republic establishment.”

“For this plan to succeed, the Taliban in principle should moderate their positions and accept democratic mechanisms and transfer of power through elections, the rights of the Shia minority and the rights of the women as enshrined in the new Constitution and the freedom of the press. Here the Taliban wants the government to accept Islamic rules and tenets. Americans have predicted that for the settlement of this issue, it is better to form a council of Faqihs or Ulema. This council of Ulema would in fact play the role of the Council of Guardian in Iran which is tasked with making the laws compatible with the Sharia. Half of the members of this council shall be appointed by the government and the other half by the Taliban.”

According to Mollazehi, in the US plan, there is going to be a National Consultative Assembly and a Senate House. The frameworks for such assemblies are yet to be defined. However, the problem is: will the members of these assemblies be appointed or elected by the vote of the people as the structure of power would change.

He added that in this case, the structure created by the Bonne Conference which centralized the power in Kabul would change.

Mollazehi added that the establishment of Afghanistan may move towards federalism and parliamentarism.

“The Taliban will not easily accept this because they believe that issues should be resolved through Islamic allegiance and Sharia rather than parliament. Their view is that there is a ruler in the Islamic state and others need to pay allegiance to the ruler. Here comes the main issue: will the Taliban accept this or the government would drop its efforts to set up a democratic mechanism and transfer of power through elections? ”

Mollazehi said such issues should be resolved in both the Moscow and Washington plans so that a ceasefire is established and the structure of power is determined.

Asked about the upcoming meeting in Moscow, he said regional countries, international players and domestic groups in Afghanistan have been invited to the Moscow conference to examine a peace plan.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading