Prospects of the end of political crisis in Libya

2021/02/24 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert of Africa studies says the United Nations Secretary General’s proposal to send international observers to guarantee and monitor the ceasefire in Libya aims to expedite the process of state-building in that country.

Jafar Qannadbashi told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that the United Nations Security Council has agreed with the Secretary General’s proposal to station observer forces in Libya.

“Of course, the process of state-building in Libya began about five years ago. However, in spite of the formation of the National Unity Government, there has been no success to pave the grounds for the formation of a permanent and nationwide government.”

He blamed the failure of the United Nations during the past five years on the existence of two different governments in Libya and the rejection of a united government by the political and military forces in the east of Libya.

Referring to the new proposal of the Secretary General of the United Nations on Libya, he said such a proposal was made while military and political talks on establishing the process of state-building in Libya have reached an acceptable stage.

Qannadbashi said the so-called 5+5 military talks, held during the past one year in Libya, have paved the grounds for the establishment of ceasefire and termination of conflict and violence inside Libya, marking a proper stage for the liberation of Libya from the internal tensions and disputes.

This expert of Africa affairs pointed to the first stage of political talks which began several months ago and said these talks have reached a remarkable successful stage.

“According to the roadmap designed in Geneva talks and based on the majority of the votes, a three-person presiding council and the prime minister of the transitional period have been chosen,” he said, adding that such a success would end the period of uncertainty in Libya and mark the beginning of a comprehensive movement to establish a permanent and nationwide government in that country.

Referring to the main duty of the presiding board and the prime minister of the transitional period in Libya, he said they are duty bound to prepare the grounds for holding nationwide elections so as to set up a new legislative assembly in the country and hold another election to choose the president.

Qannadbashi said many of the domestic and foreign parties in Libya have agreed with the formation of the presiding council and the election of the prime minister of the transitional period, adding that “however there is a possibility that some of the beneficiary governments and some of the political and militia groups in Libya would oppose like the past with the activities of these two institutes which are endorsed by the United Nations. In this connection, there are clear signs that the new elected combination is supported by the military rulers of Egypt and this could raise on one hand the sensitivity of the active Muslim Brotherhood groups in Libya and on the other hand would not be compatible with the policies of countries such as Qatar and Turkey in Libya as favored by the United Nations.”

He added that the next few days would determine if the members of the three-person presiding council and the prime minister of the transitional period are acceptable by the domestic and foreign parties in Libya and to what extent they can expedite the formation of state as favored by the United Nations.

Qannadbashi said under such circumstances, sending observer forces by the United Nations to Libya could prevent the return of conflict and pave the grounds for the beginning of a new stage—forces that may be opposed per se by some of the domestic and foreign parties against the formation of the political council.

He said some of the international powers consider the establishment of peace of Libya and the termination of military conflict there to their own disadvantage, adding that these powers are seeking to continue military conflict in Libya and pave the way for selling more arms and weapons to the conflicting parties and plunder the oil revenues of that oil-rich country.

Qannadbashi said the people of Libya have suffered a lot of hardship and difficulties as well as civil war in the past 10 years after General Qaddafi was deposed of power, adding that the present conditions require the establishment of peace and a powerful and nationwide government in Libya.

“The critical interest and welfare of the people of Libya have been sacrificed in the crises and tough political and military rivalry of regional and global powers. They have in fact pinned their hopes on the new prospects of forming a permanent government in Libya.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading