Implications of US Withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan

Strategic Council Online - Despite warnings, Ronald Trump intends to reduce the number of American troops from Afghanistan and Iraq ahead of the deadline. He wants to be still influential in foreign and security policy, and intends to constrain his successor, Joe Biden. Withdrawal of US troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, without coordination and acceptance of the responsibility, could have dangerous consequences for the region as well as for the European allies of the US. Mahmoud Fazeli – Expert on International Affairs

By January 5, when state representatives gather in Washington to elect the new president, US forces in Iraq, currently numbering 3,000, are expected to be reduced to 2,500. The cut in US troops from Iraq will have a serious impact on the fight against ISIS in that country. But the consequences of withdrawing troops from Afghanistan will be much greater. Trump also wants to reduce the current 4,500-strong military force there to 2,500 as he approaches his last days in the White House. Many in Afghanistan today are worried that with more US troops out of their country, the Taliban would take the opportunity and seize all power in Kabul.

Representatives of the Trump administration in Doha negotiated with the Taliban and reached the agreement that the US should withdraw its troops from Afghanistan by the end of April 2021 so that the Afghan government could negotiate a power-sharing deal with the Taliban as soon as possible. Kabul hopes that with the coming to power of Biden, the trend of withdrawal of the troops from Afghanistan will slow down. The people of Afghanistan are deeply concerned about what Trump is doing because it will give the Taliban, an extremist and power-hungry group, the courage to seize all the power in Kabul. The Taliban are still conducting numerous terrorist operations despite negotiating with the Kabul government.

NATO believes that the cost of a rapid withdrawal of troops from that country will be very high, and with the withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan, the country will once again become a gathering place for the terrorist groups. This decision has been made by Washington at a wrong time. Criticism of the US withdrawal from the two countries continues even within the United States. The Republican leader in the Senate has also warned against the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. According to him, everyone in the United States wants their country’s troop return home, but the consequences of the security threat to the United States should be also taken into account. Rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan could also have a negative impact on the US allies in the West. The rapid withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan undermines the government’s position in Kabul in negotiations with the Taliban for power-sharing, and jeopardizes US interests in the fight against terrorism. All commanders in charge of Afghanistan are opposed to a cut in US troops until the situation in that country improves.

But, Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller considers the decision to reduce the forces to be in line and in coordination with heads of the Pentagon and chiefs of the army of his country. According to him, with only 2,500 troops remaining in Afghanistan who would only be protecting themselves, training of Afghan troops in other areas would no more be possible. Gen. McMaster, Trump’s former national security adviser, as the main critic of the decision, believes that by doing so, Washington has sided with the Taliban and against the Afghan government. The decision has undermined the government’s position in Kabul in talks with the Taliban for power-sharing, and confused US allies in Afghanistan.

What is unclear today is that what decision the new President Joe Biden will make when he enters the White House. As former vice-president, he was opposed to the large-scale presence of his country’s troops in Afghanistan, arguing that the United States should have a small force in that country to fight terrorist groups, especially the al-Qaeda. Regardless of who wins the US elections, US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are killed solely for the political and strategic goals of the decision-makers, therefore, a change in US military strategy in the Middle East and Central Asia is a fact that US officials must face with.

There is some evidence that the election of Antony Blinken to the State Department is a guarantee of the return to normalcy in the management of international relations. He knows many international leaders and has proven his ability for talks and believes in the usefulness of unity, cooperation and multilateralism. He is likely to consider the fact that the American public opinion are not interested in international commitments.

Countering the rise of anti-American sentiment in Afghanistan and Iraq, increasing anti-war sentiment in the domestic arena, growing differences between the government and the Pentagon and, the growing cost of military presence in the two countries are just some of the reasons for Trump’s decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan and Iraq. In Afghanistan, the government has failed to establish a strong foothold and the Taliban are still alive; in Iraq, the United States has failed to live up to its claims of the so-called democratic reform; these two wars were costly wars that weighed heavily on Washington’s financial burden and left a deep wound.

According to Iran, the United States is trying to leave Afghanistan in such a way that the country will be embroiled in war and bloodshed. All Afghan parties and all groups must be able to talk to each other in a fully inter-Afghan process. War and violence do not bring peace, tranquility and development to the people of Afghanistan. If the Americans withdraw in this way, the Taliban may decide to end the conflict militarily and seize Kabul by force, raising concerns among countries, including Iran. Tehran worries about the rapid and uncoordinated withdrawal of American troops, conditions such as the time of the victory of jihad against the Soviet Union in which the Mujahideen clashed with each other and the long civil war broke out, Afghanistan will be involved in such an issue again and become the base for radical groups.

According to the Iraqi Foreign Minister, the reduction of the US presence in his country is affected by two issues. The first is the decision of the Iraqi parliamentarians for the complete withdrawal of American troops from the country, and the second is the change in the security situation in Iraq. The result of the talks between the two sides included the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq and approval of their withdrawal plan from Iraq.

The US decision to withdraw troops from Iraq is likely to shift the balance of power significantly in Iran’s favor, a negative development for Trump, who has sought to undermine Iran through “maximum pressure” throughout his presidency. The vacuum to be created by the withdrawal of American troops, along with the weakened power of the Iraqi government, could jeopardize one of the most important countries in the Middle East and under such circumstances Iran will take advantage of the situation as a potential player.

Another group claims that further reductions in US troops and the created vacuum are likely to entail increased destructive activities of the ISIS. In the absence of the American forces and the pressure from their allied forces, the quality and intensity of those attacks will definitely increase.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading