Impact of Imran Khan’s Kabul Visit on Facilitating Afghan Peace Process

2020/11/28 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: An analyst of Afghan affairs said that Imran Khan’s visit to Kabul could not untie a knot in the Afghan peace talks in Qatar, adding that what is called Pakistan’s support for the Taliban is the main cause of disagreement between the two countries. He added that it seems that as long as Afghanistan fails to achieve lasting peace, there will be no opportunity for detente in the relations between the two countries.

Mohammad Reza Asgari Moroudi, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referred to the visit of the Prime Minister of Pakistan to Kabul and consultations on helping the peace process in Afghanistan and said: The visit of Imran Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan, to Afghanistan took place after the visit of Abdullah Abdullah, Chairman of the High Council of National Reconciliation of Afghanistan, and of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who called for the help in the inter-Afghan negotiations process.

Explaining the challenges facing inter-Afghan talks in Qatar and the inflexibility of the Taliban negotiating team, as well as diminishing hopes for the outcome of the peace talks, he continued: In the strategic view of Afghan officials, Pakistan plays an important role in peace developments in their country and Pakistan’s support plays an important role in the political structure of Afghanistan.

Referring to Imran Khan’s foreign policy slogan in the elections, for the development of relations with its neighbors, especially Afghanistan, the Afghan affairs expert said: Mr. Imran Khan and his government have had a positive attitude towards Afghanistan and its developments over the past two years. But it should be noted that in Pakistan’s foreign policy, in addition to the government, some institutions, including the army or its intelligence service, also play a key role in Pakistan’s foreign policy.

Pessimism, Historical Differences Prevent Advancement of Deeper Ties with Afghanistan

Emphasizing the demand of the officials of the two countries for the improvement of the relations and end to dissatisfactions, Asgari Moroudi continued: The Government of Afghanistan is trying to increase its bargaining power in the negotiations within the framework of creating a regional consensus. But it must be borne in mind that there is a kind of pessimism and historical difference in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations that has always manifested itself in the past two or three decades.

He added: What is called Pakistan’s support for the Taliban is the main reason for the differences between the two countries, and it seems that there will be no opportunity for de-escalation in the relations between the two countries until Afghanistan reaches a lasting peace and war comes to an end in that country.

Imran Khan’s recent visit to Kabul was more in the context of maintaining political relations between the two neighboring countries, the Afghan affairs expert said, adding: Given the current situation, this visit could not untie a knot in the Afghan peace talks in Qatar, as despite the talks, we are witnessing an increase in violence. However, given the growing tensions between the two countries, officials of the two sides are trying to show a sign of good relations by maintaining political relations and continue the relations with caution until there is an opportunity for dialogue to resolve the differences.

According to Asgari, under the status quo the trip should be considered as a political gesture to show good bilateral relations, and it seems that the Prime Minister of Pakistan, according to what the Afghan authorities and people expect, cannot take an effective approach to get the country out of the current problems, including the complexity of the peace talks process.

He also referred to Imran Khan’s previous statements on the need to form an interim government as a solution to the Afghan crisis and Kabul’s strong criticism of it, saying: There is a kind of historical pessimism in Afghanistan towards Pakistan and even positive actions of the Pakistani government towards the peace process from the point of view of a range of pessimists in Afghanistan is considered as a conspiracy. They have no confidence in Pakistan’s policies at all.

Asgari Moroudi described the Taliban’s transformation into a multi-sect after Mullah Mohammed Omar’s death as a factor in weakening Pakistan’s influence over the Taliban and continued: The Pakistani Prime Minister said during his visit to Kabul that ‘…more than your expectations, we will be helping you.’ The remarks show that senior Pakistani government officials are also aware of the historical pessimistic view of Pakistan and are working to correct such a pessimistic view in order to persuade the other side to maintain bilateral relations and take advantage of the potentials of influential groups in Pakistan.

He cited talks on some of Pakistan’s concerns as another target of the visit, saying that Imran Khan had said that India was planning to kill ulema and create sectarian strife in Pakistan. In recent days, Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi has again raised the issue of India’s use of Afghan territory for anti-security measures in Pakistan; this, of course, has been strongly denied by some Afghan officials.

Asgari added: In the atmosphere of competition and antagonism that has existed between India and Pakistan in recent decades, whenever one of the two countries moves towards development of political and economic relations with other countries, the other side’s sensitivity is aroused. Pakistan seems to be concerned about India-Afghanistan cooperation and convergence and sees it as a step towards coordination against Islamabad.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading