Joe Biden’s Approach to Afghanistan Peace Process

2020/11/17 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Sarwar Danesh, Second Vice-President of Afghanistan, has called on the next US administration to reconsider the process of negotiations with the Taliban group. Danesh also criticized escalation of violence and the Taliban’s lack of cooperation in the peace process, saying that most Taliban members who have been released from prisons in Afghanistan had returned to the battlefields contrary to their commitment. Now the question is whether with the victory of Joe Biden in the US elections the policies of that country towards Afghanistan will change?

In response to this question, Pir Mohammad Mollazehi, an expert on the Subcontinent affairs, told the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that the US general policy with regard to Afghanistan is not determined only by the president of that country. Rather, the collective governing body determines the general policies at the global level, including Afghanistan. Therefore, it cannot be expected that a fundamental change be made in Biden’s policies towards Afghanistan compared to Trump’s policies.

He continued by saying: Of course, since human rights issues are of more importance to the Democrats, perhaps changes would be made at a more limited scale such as putting the Taliban in a more difficult position and showing more support for the central government in Kabul.

According to the expert, the reality is that the current situation is not as such that if Biden starts his work at the White House, he could make a serious and rapid change in the US policies.

Referring to the fact that the Americans have reached the conclusion that there is no military solution to the Afghan issue and that they have spent money in that country in vain, Mollazehi said: In Afghanistan, the Taliban have power and the United States should give a share to this group in the power so that they might be able to solve the problem in a controlled way.

Meanwhile, the Taliban have shown a reaction to Biden’s victory in the US elections. The group said in a statement that the elections and the change of US officials are the internal affairs of that country and the Taliban are committed to the peace agreement it had signed with the United States.

According to the expert on the Subcontinent affairs, the Taliban’s concern is that the agreement they signed with the US might be modified by Biden because it is too much unilaterally in their favour and the Kabul government is opposing it.

Regarding the Taliban’s commitment to the peace agreement reached under the Trump administration, Mollazehi said: The Taliban should not be taken too seriously in this regard; rather it is the ISI of Pakistan that has taken control of the affairs. The general policy of the ISI of Pakistan in Afghanistan is that Afghans should accept at least four cases so that Pakistan would force the Taliban to compromise;

  • Accept the Durand Line
  • Open a free transit line without customs and formalities for Pakistan to Central Asia; because this issue is highly important for Pakistan due to its rivalry with India and knows that India is trying to take Central Asia out of the hands of the Pakistanis through Chabahar.
  • There should be a puppet government in Kabul that would at least be in line with Islamabad.
  • Afghanistan reduces India’s influence in that country.

Mollazehi continued: Therefore, until Pakistan fails to achieve its targets the Taliban game would not be over and the Americans have realized this point. But because Pakistan is getting closer to China and Russia, Trump’s hands were not much open to impose serious pressure on Islamabad to change its policy.

He also referred to other variables related to the issue of Afghanistan and said: For example, the role of Saudi Arabia and its relationship with the Taliban should not be overlooked. If we consider all these conditions collectively, it can be said that the US had come to the conclusion that it should not pay more for Afghanistan, but this does not mean that the US will evacuate Afghanistan completely. Even Trump would not do that.

Emphasizing that the US deal with the Taliban also has an undisclosed part which has not been revealed yet, Mollazehi explained: In that part, the Taliban with strong possibility have accepted that the US troops would remain at a limited level in the two main bases in Afghanistan. However, although no reliable information has been released yet, in general, it can be concluded that the US will not evacuate Afghanistan because, for Washington, only the issue of Afghanistan itself is not important, but for the US other issues such as Central Asia, Iran, the Uighurs and China are more important. In fact, the US presence in Afghanistan is aimed at controlling China.

He concluded that Biden would pursue the same policy towards the Taliban and that more possibly they might only put more pressure on Pakistan.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading