Sudanese Mercenaries Pullout from Yemen Paves the Way for Collapse of Saudi Coalition

2020/10/20 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The decision of Sudan’s military leaders to withdraw Sudanese mercenaries from the Yemeni territory shows that the Saudi coalition is on the verge of collapse after five years. Hassan Hanizadeh – Expert on Middle East Affairs

The Sudanese forces, numbering up to 3,000, entered into war against the Yemeni people during the rule of ousted Sudanese dictator Omar al-Bashir within the framework of the Saudi coalition. The forces entered Yemen within the framework of an agreement reached between Saudi Arabia and Omar al-Bashir in response to Saudi Arabia’s commitment to paying 1 billion dollars a year to Sudan.

The ousted Sudanese dictator dispatched 3,000 Sudanese volunteer forces, mostly non-professionals, to Yemen by receiving 1 billion dollars a year from Saudi Arabia. He also pledged to reduce his diplomatic ties with Iran to the lowest possible level in return for receiving the money. Also, in the final years of his rule, Omar al-Bashir became strongly inclined to Saudi Arabia but refused to accept the plan for normalization of relations with the Zionist regime.

This issue eventually angered Saudi Arabia and the UAE, because these two regimes were commissioned by the US to encourage poor Arab countries to establish relations with the Israeli regime in return for receiving financial aid. Since the former dictator of Sudan refused to establish diplomatic relations with the Zionist regime, the US, Saudi Arabia and the UAE plotted a coup d’état against Omar al-Bashir.

Later, some Islamic parties in Sudan revolted against the rule of Omar al-Bashir in protest to the alliance of the ousted dictator of that country with Saudi Arabia and dispatch of mercenary forces to fight with the oppressed people of Yemen. The uprising of the Sudanese people against the regime and the street unrests that resulted in the murder of hundreds of people led the army to use the prevailing conditions for a coup against Omar al-Bashir. The coup took place while Sudanese army generals were secretly meeting and holding talks with the authorities of the Zionist regime.

After the coup of the Sudanese army officers, Saudi Arabia did not fulfil its promises to the Sudanese coup plotters and cut off its financial aid to the impoverished North African country. We are witnessing the result of the attitude of Saudi Arabia towards Sudan today manifested in the withdrawal of Sudanese forces from the anti-Yemen coalition.

Saudi Arabia took the same attitude towards countries such as Egypt, Morocco, Jordan and Pakistan; as the prolongation of the Saudi war against the Yemeni people led to the annual Saudi budget deficit. Saudi Arabia spent more than 350 billion dollars in its five-year war against Yemen, which faced Saudi Arabia with a budget deficit of 150 billion dollars in the year 2020 for the first time in its history.

As a result, Egypt, Morocco, Jordan and Pakistan withdrew their mercenaries from the Saudi coalition against Yemen due to the prolongation of the war and the Saudi inability to pay its financial obligations to those countries. The withdrawal of these forces from the Saudi coalition, which had no motive to fight, caused Saudi Arabia to limit its attacks on the Yemeni people only to the air force because soldiers of the Saudi ground forces were severely exhausted. Many high-ranking commanders and officers of the Saudi Army who showed their inability to fight Yemen on the ground were ousted by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Now the Saudi regime has entered into an atmosphere of erosive war with the army and popular forces and the Yemeni Ansarullah and cannot get out of this quagmire easily without paying any cost. On the other hand, Ansarullah, along with the army and revolutionary committees, by relying on local facilities and manufacture of advanced weapons and localizing ballistic missiles and making anti-radar drones managed to change the equation of war in their favour. Under the status quo, the field areas and the initiative are at the disposal of the Ansarullah forces, and Saudi Arabia has taken on a defensive and non-offensive position, except in the field of the air force.

The outlook for Saudi Arabia’s five-year war against the oppressed nation of Yemen shows that the popular forces have adapted their conditions to the realities on the ground to prevent the Saudi conspiracies from becoming operational. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia tried to oust the Yemeni Shiite Houthis from power by imposing a devastating war and by forming a puppet government in Yemen but the alliance of the majority of Yemeni people with the Houthis thwarted the plan. Now, Ansarullah, as a military and field reality, along with other revolutionary forces, is determined to fight up to the final victory with the Saudi regime and revive the famous historical saying of Yemen. There is an old and historical saying in Yemen that says any foreign army that enters into war against the Yemeni people will eventually leave the country with a white flag, and this saying will also apply to Saudi Arabia.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading