Prospects, Challenges of Negotiations between Taliban & Gov’t

2020/07/18 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An Afghan affairs analyst said that the process of dialogue between the Afghans and its future does not seem dark: "Given the existing challenges, we will certainly not see a comprehensive agreement between the Taliban and the Afghan government in the short term, but we can expect the process of dialogue gradually reduce the volume of disputes.

Farzad Ramezani Boonesh, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referred to the remarks of the spokesman of the President of Afghanistan regarding the possibility of starting peace talks between Afghans in July: “One of the goals of the US-Taliban talks last year and the agreement reached was to provide the platform for the Taliban to reach a fundamental and structural deal with other major currents and political parties in Afghanistan and come out of the role of a political-military opposition, and by being part of the power, lead the political and security atmosphere in Afghanistan towards stability and peace.

Taliban Have to Deal with Major Ruling Currents in Kabul

He added: “But at least in the last six months, various political, security and legal challenges have surfaced in the way of establishing a kind of inter-Afghan dialogue between the Taliban and the former national unity government, as well as the current inclusive government of Afghanistan; It should be noted, however, that the Taliban now have to deal with the main currents in Kabul, the two main factions of the government in Afghanistan, which themselves have allies. In another dimension the Taliban seem to have a number of maximum demands and claims which they try to accomplish by using the negotiation process with the government of Afghanistan.

The Afghan analyst stressed that the incumbent government does not want the governance structure and the constitution and various other major issues in Afghanistan to be maximally affected by the Taliban presence in power: “It seems that the government is willing to recognize Taliban’s share of power in Kabul and turn them from military to political current; But this share does not seem to be big.

 

Challenges Facing the Taliban

Ramezani added: “The Taliban have more demands than what is considered as their share of power; Topics such as the Islamic Emirate and the future name of the Afghan government, the constitution, Islamic regulations and the views of various currents on this issue, civil liberties, outlooks about the minorities, as well as Taliban’s relationship with other extremist and terrorist movements in Afghanistan such as ISIS and al-Qaeda , Along with the kind of share they will have in power in the future, is somehow open to challenge and debate.

 

No Comprehensive Agreement between Taliban & government in Short Term

Stressing that the challenges facing both sides have made it very difficult to reach an immediate result, he said: “At the same time, the process of dialogue between the Afghans and the future of these talks does not look bleak, but certainly in the short term we see a comprehensive agreement between the Taliban and the government of Afghanistan; Rather, we should wait for the negotiation process to reduce the volume of disputes a little bit and bring them into the process of reaching an agreement that can shape the principles and provisions of the fundamental agreement in the future.

Referring to the challenges facing the inter-Afghan talks, Ramezani continued: “It seems that the process of internal developments in Afghanistan, as well as the views of regional and international actors and other demands in Afghan civil society, will force the Taliban and the incumbent government to accept these talks.” But the extent to which the two sides fall short of their demands is questionable, as there is no prospect of reaching an agreement in the short term.

Taliban Not in a Position to Shy away from Dialogue

He added: “However, with the advancement of the negotiation process, the two sides, while getting acquainted with the views, will be forced to reach agreements on macroeconomic, political and security issues inside Afghanistan.” Because, in practice, the Taliban are not in a position to avoid dialogue based on the approaches and demands of the past two decades.”

“One of the most important reasons for the continuation of the Taliban approaches in Afghanistan is the presence of the Americans and the West in this country, and with the agreement reached between the US and the Taliban, we will gradually face the withdrawal of NATO and US troops. Although some of these forces may remain in the country, the Taliban are not in a position to actually advance their former maximum and 100% demands and call for a unilateral government.”

Referring to the role of regional powers and the negotiations they have had with the Taliban in recent months, he said: “In the past few years, the Taliban have somehow tried to establish more contact with regional and international actors. This is the cornerstone of the peace process and dialogue with the government, as most regional and international actors support the Taliban-government dialogue process, and even issues such as mediation have been pursued.

Referring to the meeting between the Iranian representative in Afghanistan and the Taliban’s political deputy, Ramezani added: “The Taliban and the Afghan government have a positive view of Iran’s efforts to reach an agreement between the two sides. In this regard, Iran has the capacity as a mediator to bring the views of the Taliban and the government closer together and to assist in the negotiation process.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading