Prospect of Peace Talks in Light of New Developments in Afghanistan

2020/03/15 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: It looks like eventually US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, who is in Kabul, will intervene in the current governance process in Afghanistan and bring Abdullah Abdullah to the negotiating table: A situation similar to what happened when John Kerry was in office; that is today a new government will be formed with some differences. In this new government, space will also be opened for the Taliban, and Zalmay will probably succeed in bringing the three currents - Ashraf Ghani, Abdullah Abdullah and Taliban to the negotiating table to pull Afghanistan out of the current situation. Pir Mohammad Molazehi - Indian Subcontinent Affairs Expert

The recent agreement between the United States and the Taliban is the product of a broader agreement that could be described as a kind of deal between Pakistan, the United States, the Taliban, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Besides, the agreement has been reached with parties providing the Taliban with financial, political, or ideological support.

The Taliban’s sidelining of the Kabul government in the process is also quite clear, as the Taliban did not recognize the government in the peace process at all but from what we see today the Taliban seem to have agreed to engage with the central government anyway. The only problem is that there are currently two governments in Afghanistan – one led by Ashraf Ghani and the other headed by Abdullah Abdullah.

The Taliban are expected not to negotiate with Abdullah Abdullah because they see the Jihadists as their main enemy, but will probably negotiate with Ashraf Ghani’s government. It can be assumed that the Americans have convinced the Taliban that they will not come to power militarily, and first they need to get a share of power to achieve their goal. Sharing power is possible only with Ashraf Ghani, a liberal Democrat.

A peace committee appears to be set up in Kabul after a government comes to power. Encouraged by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the United States, the Taliban will enter into talks with the committee. In the process, as the US has predicted, the Taliban will first become a power partner, but in the end, if the Taliban form a party and give up the war they could gain full power later because the incumbent government does not have much popular support and legitimacy. It should also be kept in mind that the Taliban have a good standing in traditional Afghan society.

Considering what was said it is expected that after the US-Taliban agreement, the ground for peace and negotiation between the central government and the Taliban will gradually be prepared. In that case, the process of internal peace in Afghanistan will be followed. Of course, the peace process does not mean that peace between the Taliban, the US and the central government will be fully restored in Afghanistan. There are more than 20 armed groups in Afghanistan that have no role in the negotiations. There is also ISIS who claims to be a caliph. Moreover, ISIS is currently operating in Afghanistan.

Concerning the divisions between Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani and each one’s emphasis on their presidency, as well as the fact that they have been sidelined in the Doha negotiations, they have now begun a complicated game, having first held the elections without Washington’s coordination. After the elections, Ashraf Ghani and the Election Commission without coordination with Abdullah Abdullah announced that Ashraf Ghani had won, but Abdullah Abdullah did not accept the result, so today we see two governments in Afghanistan. But Ashraf Ghani’s government is in fact official in Afghanistan because he still has legal mechanisms in place. Also, the US and many European delegates did not attend the inauguration of Abdullah Abdullah and showed that they recognize Ashraf Ghani as president. In this regard, although Abdullah Abdullah’s government has no legal standing and that he knows he has no chance of presidency, he seeks to win his share of power.

Ashraf Ghani has recently offered 40 per cent of the power to Abdullah Abdullah but the latter has not accepted the share yet.

It looks like eventually US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, who is in Kabul, will intervene in the current governance process in Afghanistan and bring Abdullah to the negotiating table, almost the same that happened when John Kerry was in office; that is today a new government will be formed with some differences. In this new government, space will also be opened for the Taliban, and Zalmay will probably succeed in bringing the three currents – Ashraf Ghani, Abdullah Abdullah and Taliban to the negotiating table to pull Afghanistan out of the current situation.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading