Riyadh Agreement Aims at More Pressure on Ansarullah than Resolving Yemen Crisis

2019/11/11 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: A Middle East affairs expert and history researcher says the Riyadh agreement between the Yemeni Transitional Council and Mansour Hadi cannot help restore calm in Yemen. He said the aim of the deal is not peace but to increase pressure on Ansarullah.

Speaking to the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Hojatollah Jodaki said: “The agreement is said to be aimed at achieving peace, but it has been prepared very cunningly and has actually tried to minimize the differences between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.”

“Saudi Arabia and the UAE need each other but they don’t trust one other and their problem is distrust,” he said. The UAE argues how are the Saudis going to defend the Emirate while they cannot defend themselves? For the same reason the UAE acts with caution. It interferes in some matters and in some cases tries to hand over power. The United Arab Emirates feels its position is shaky.

Referring to some clauses of the agreement on integration of efforts under the leadership of the Arab Coalition to counter Ansarullah, he added: “They have been able thanks to Saudi efforts, to put the southerners led by the administration of Mansour Hadi against Ansarullah. In fact, they are concentrating all their power in southern Yemen but not in the name of the southern government, but in the name of the transitional Yemeni government so that they can exert maximum political pressure on Ansarullah.

Commenting on the Saudi Crown Prince’s remarks that the deal is a step towards ending the Yemeni war, Jodaki said: “The agreement cannot help restore calm in Yemen, but it can temporarily inspire the southerners that they can enter an army led by Mr. Mansour Hadi’s government in military bands and get temporary jobs and earn a living. In fact, Saudi Arabia gives them money and uses them against Yemen’s Ansarullah. For this reason the agreement is partially successful, but it cannot solve the problems of Yemen at all.

On the initial response of Yemen’s Ansarullah that the deal is not representative of the Yemeni nation and will never be implemented, the Middle East affairs analyst said Saudi Arabia and Mansour Hadi have opened a political umbrella under the pretext of peace and are working to direct the line of thinking in their own favor. But whether Saudi Arabian wants to make peace with Ansarullah is another matter which requires other measures, including a full pause in their attacks so that Ansarullah could follow the same line.

“Temporary solutions are useless and will not solve the problem,” he said. They have to find the root cause of the problem. In fact, according to the new deal, they have merely sought to claim that there is a government called the Yemeni government with an insurgent group called Yemen’s Ansarullah still fighting it. The agreement does not mention what the root problems are in Yemen and how past issues have led to the current situation.

He said that the agreement is aimed at stabilizing Saudi presence in Yemen, adding: “Saudi Arabia is the godfather of the government of Mr. Mansour Hadi.” Video clips released from the agreement showed that in Riyadh, despite the presence of Mansour Hadi and the Southerners, one person representing the two sides signed the agreement. They have shown that there is a government, which is naturally a puppet of Saudi Arabia, although it does not have a seat in Yemen and is based in Riyadh, but it can always be the Yemeni government in the eyes of the media and in the vacuum of power.

Jodaki emphasized that the goal of the deal is not to achieve peace but intended solely to increase pressure on Ansarullah. He said: “They know that peace would not be achieved under these circumstances. Saudi Arabia wants to test what it has already tested. Saudi Arabia had pursued such a plan before, but failed. Now the Riyadh leaders think this time they may succeed.

He said: “Basically, the problem of poverty and wealth and the unequal distribution of power in any territory, whether its people are Muslim or Jewish or Christian creates deep divisions. When these deep divisions turn into war the way to cure them is different and these remedies Saudi Arabia is looking for will not be a cure for these wounds.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading