Upcoming Presidential Elections in Afghanistan

2019/08/10 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: It would be an important step if Pakistan succeeds in persuading the Taliban to negotiate with the Central Government. The Taliban still do not recognize the government of Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah and believe that the government should step down first and then discuss the elections. Pir Mohammad Molazehi - Afghanistan expert

The 2019 presidential election is the third of its kind in Afghanistan. The Afghan Election Commission has announced the date of the presidential election on 28 September 2019. According to news reports, the presidential election was scheduled to be held simultaneously with provincial and district council elections, as well as a previously postponed parliamentary vote in Ghazni Province. But later the Afghan Independent Election Commission (IEC) announced that it was only able to hold the presidential election. In this election, 18 candidates have registered to run for the presidency.

Of course, it is not 100 per cent clear whether the presidential election will be held in Afghanistan. Because, the council of candidates claims Ashraf Ghani may take advantage of state-sponsored means to remain in power, and there are also talks of possible rigging. So it is not clear at this time whether the election will certainly be held in Afghanistan. In particular, Americans too are reluctant to hold the elections at this time.

The United States first wants to settle the issue of peace with the Taliban and then pursue the election debate.

Meantime, Imran Khan of Pakistan has suggested that the Taliban also have a candidate in the election. Now, if the Taliban nominate a person to run in the vote is one thing and if they refuse to do so is another thing and they could even throw obstacles on the way of the election.

Also, 11 out of the 18 Afghan candidates have announced that they have created a council to hold a free and fair election the way they see it so that the government would not be able to use state facilities to serve the personal interests of the president in the election.

Also, there is serious disagreement between Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani. Abdullah Abdullah currently holds at least 50 per cent of the power on paper, and the National Unity Government was formed based on a 50-50 share agreement. Mr Abdullah is now claiming that Ashraf Ghani is acting illegally and is handling the state affairs in a way to remain in power.

So now there is a concern from the candidates and on a more general level, it seems that the provision of security is a very important issue. It is an important step if Pakistan can persuade the Taliban to come to the negotiating table with the Central Government. As the Taliban still do not recognize the government of Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah, they believe that the government should step down first and then discuss the elections.

Another suggestion is that a provisional government comes to power in Afghanistan and then elections be held.

The United States also proposes that a two-year interim government be set up to resolve all the problems of Afghanistan, Pakistan and the region at once.

The current situation in Afghanistan is such that the tenure of the current government ended in June, but according to a court ruling, it will stay in power until the new president takes over. Therefore, the presence of the incumbent government is not very legal. For the same reason, we are now witnessing a rivalry between the Taliban and the National Unity Government on the one hand, and the National Unity Government and the presidential hopefuls on the other. In this space, we have to see how things are going to proceed.

As for the Taliban, the issue depends on where the talks between Taliban and Zalmai Khalilzad (special envoy of the US on Afghanistan) will be leading to. Khalilzad has announced that they will reach an agreement with the Taliban before the presidential election on September 28. The initial agreements have been reached but whether the Taliban are willing to negotiate with the Central Government is another matter. It seems that because the Taliban do not recognize this government, they are waiting for elections to be held and enter into talks with the next government if Ashraf Ghani is not re-elected.

Because there is now talk about power-sharing. The Taliban want the majority power while other ethnic and religious groups such as Tajiks and Hazaras are not ready to give the Taliban the majority.

In the meantime, if the Taliban and the government reach a peace agreement, it seems that they will also resolve the issue of power-sharing. That is, they turn the system into a federal one so that each ethnic region has its local government. This is a more realistic scenario, in that the Taliban can also establish a local government in the Pashtun areas and have a stake in the Central Government.

But ultimately, as the fate of the election and peace between the government and the Taliban is still unclear, it is not possible to forecast and analyze the future scenarios.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading